Skip to Content
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Log In

Metro Board Approves Highway Program Modernization

5:39 PM PDT on June 24, 2021

Projects like Long Beach’s Shoreline Drive realignment were considered ineligible for some Metro funding. They now are. Image via city of Long Beach presentation

Today, the full Metro board of directors approved modernizing the Metro Highway Program. The proposal faced significant resistance, though it essentially just reaffirms language that voters approved in Metro's Measure M transportation sales tax referendum.

The item does not change any current highway projects, but it allows for flexibility on future highway-funded projects, many of which are on city streets. The Metro Highway Program had blocked complete streets features from being included in projects funded by some Metro sales tax revenue. Now, where appropriate, these projects can include features that support transit, bicycling, and walking.

The problem arose from Metro's overly restrictive interpretation of the sales tax ordinance. Measure M defined “Highway Construction” as projects on “public highway and street rights-of-way… includ[ing] Complete Streets, Green Streets, and active transportation improvements such as bikeways and pedestrian improvements.” But Metro's Highway Program adopted guidelines that did not acknowledge this voter-approved, multimodal direction.

The just-adopted policy revision has been under discussion since mid-2020. Metro circulated the proposed policy for comment to various Councils of Governments, and while some voices there were critical of it, most COGs were ultimately supportive. The item was discussed at several Metro board meetings, including in March, when the board approved circulating the proposed language for a final three-month review.

BizFed's alert opposing greater flexibility for Highway Program funding
Screengrab of BizFed alert opposing greater flexibility for Metro Highway Program funding - click to enlarge

Late yesterday, the L.A. County Business Federation (BizFed) came out against the proposal, stating that it would "reduce highway funding" and that it "must be fully vetted in the light of day." Several BizFed speakers used these talking points during public comment at today's Metro meeting.

A broad coalition of community groups - including many transit and active transportation nonprofits -  submitted a group letter in favor of the proposal. Many public commenters spoke in favor of the proposal.

Ultimately, the entire Metro board unanimously approved the item, though several directors - County Supervisor Kathryn Barger, Whittier City Councilmember Fernando Dutra, and Glendale City Councilmember Ara Najarian - expressed some reservations.

The short-term effects of the new policy will not be dramatic, but two Long Beach projects that were essentially put on hold by the Gateway Cities Council of Governments can now move forward with Metro funding. Hopefully, in the longer term, Highway Program projects will include more multimodal components, providing the broad range of transportation options that voters approved in Measure M.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog Los Angeles

Input Meetings Starting This Weekend for Ballona Creek “Finish the Creek” Extension Study

Learn more and give your ideas for extending the Ballona Creek bike/walk path upstream through Culver City and into Mid-City Los Angeles

September 21, 2023

Guest Opinion: Metro Should Treat Walk and Bike Projects with the Respect They Deserve

Prioritizing true first mile/last mile infrastructure isn’t somehow optional; it’s how your customers get to and from the transit stations.

September 21, 2023

Eyes on the Street: Slow Streets in South Pasadena

The city has a sampler platter of quick-build temporary traffic calming installations to experience for the rest of the year

September 20, 2023
See all posts