Skip to Content
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Log In
Car Sharing

LaBonge: Looser Parking Restrictions Would Make Car Share More Attractive

As the City of Los Angeles continues to mull through a series of proposals to expand Car Sharing from its current 40-space contract with ZipCar, Council Member Tom LaBonge is pushing a new idea. LaBonge wants to see the city loosen parking restrictions for carshare vehicles, providing an alternative to dedicating spaces providers. The "point to point" carshare has proven successful in Vancouver and Berlin. In North America, Car2Go offers point to point carshare in two-seated smart cars in Austin, TX.

Photo: Lacy Atkins, ##http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/City-working-to-make-car-sharing-more-popular-3177537.php##SFGate##

"Point-to-point carshare could take more Angelenos to more places, as well as decrease congestion," writes LaBonge. "We should join Vancouver and Berlin, our Sister Cities, in implementing this concept." 

LaBonge introduced a motion to this effect last month. The motion asks the City Attorney to investigate the legality of relaxing the restrictions for particular cases and makes the case that each new carshare vehicle will reduce congestion throughout the city.

In a point-to-point carsharing system, Angelenos can pick up a nearby shared car and drop it off anywhere within the City of Los Angeles. The success of a program depends on the ease of finding on-street parking upon drop off. Promoting such a program will decrease congestion by allowing an increasing number of Angelenos to live
without a car.

The current City of Los Angeles municipal code makes no allowance for point-topoint carsharing. For such a program to be feasible, on-street parking restrictions must be relaxed, including but not limited to: permit parking districts, parking at meters, and time restrictions.

Staff with Council Member Bill Rosendahl, the Chair of the Transportation Committee, explain that there is no timeline for when the motion will be heard.  First, the city needs to make its choice on who will be awarded the "official" carshare contract with the city before deciding whether or not to move forward with special exemptions.

However, it's never too early to begin the debate. Before it becomes a fait accompli, or before its dead on arrival, let's start the discussion around two questions.

First, is a major relaxing of parking restrictions across the city worth the benefits of an expanded carshare program.

Second, is a "point to point" system an improvement over the current one or should only be tried in addition to the current one?

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog Los Angeles

Extending the Foothill A Line Hasn’t Been Forgotten

Plans are underway to get the track built to Claremont, and stakeholders remain hopeful that Montclair can make a comeback.

January 21, 2026

Wednesday’s Headlines

ICE, Metro meeting tomorrow, Torrance, transit ambassadors, Santa Monica, Glendale, red light cameras, Koreatown, Long Beach parking, car-nage, and more

January 21, 2026

Uh Oh! Dueling Alignments Could Throw Torrance Metro Rail Extension into Limbo

Metro's plan for a four-mile light rail extension from Redondo Beach to Torrance could get a lot more difficult, and more expensive

January 20, 2026

Tuesday’s Headlines

ICE, DIY crosswalks, Torrance rail, Sepulveda rail, Metro, Pasadena, car-nage, and more

January 20, 2026

Santa Monica Parking Enforcement Vehicles to Use AI Cameras to Ticket Bike Lane Violations

Similar to on-bus AI cameras for bus lanes, but with two new wrinkles: cameras will be on city cars, and will detect bike lane blockers

January 16, 2026

Friday’s Headlines

ICE, Metro vs. SB79, Olympics, Santa Monica parking, homelessness, Koreatown, Santa Clarita, Malibu, car-nage, and more

January 16, 2026
See all posts