Skip to Content
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Log In
Streetsblog.net

DC’s Car-Sharing Fee: A Case Study in Bad Parking Policy

Car-sharing is an all-around great deal for cities. According to research from UC Berkeley [PDF], each shared car removes 14 from the road. It cuts down on carbon emissions [PDF]. Car-sharing users even spend more at local businesses [PDF].

In a grand gesture in bad parking policy, DC is levying a steep parking fee on its car-sharing fleet. Photo: The City Fix

You would think cities would be bending over backward to welcome these communal vehicles. But Washington, D.C. has imposed a steep parking fee on the city’s car sharing fleet. At $200 to $400 per month, the cost will add about $1 to $2 to the price of using a car.

Clayton Lane at Network blog The City Fix explains why this policy is so flawed:

DDOT, rather than levy a 20 percent tax on carsharing members whose behavior benefits the neighborhood, should keep carsharing affordable and instead tax private car use – the main source of congestion and many environmental problems. DDOT could raise the same revenue with a painless $2 annual fee for all residential parking tags. Or it could simply charge $100 annually for each household’s second car. Or implement smart meters, which vary prices based on real-time demand, ensuring that around 15 percent of commercial on-street parking spaces remain available. In downtown Redwood City, Calif., smart meters generate $1 million of additional revenue each year for safer, cleaner sidewalks.

The worst part is that car owners will continue to park on-street virtually for free. Annual tags will still cost $15 per household, with the second car parking totally free. Why should carsharing members pay market rates for on-street parking, while car owners get a subsidy? It’s totally backward policy.

Donald Shoup, in his seminal book, “The High Cost of Free Parking,” estimates the market value of on-street spaces in central Los Angeles at $31,000 each – more valuable than the vehicles parked in them. Subsidizing car ownership with free parking distorts the market, encouraging more people to own and drive cars. As Shoup says, everyone pays for free parking – except the driver. Now in D.C., sadly, even carsharing members will.

Elsewhere on the Network today: Mobilizing the Region reports that Nassau County has a $26 million surplus, just enough to keep afloat the Long Island Bus service it claims it can’t afford. The Atlanta Bicycle Coalition brings word that locals have taken up “tactical urbanism” to demonstrate the need for more public space. And Grid Chicago says that new bike lanes just keep appearing in the Windy City.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog Los Angeles

Friday’s Headlines

Valley-Westside rail, South Bay rail, transit-oriented housing, green WeHo bike lanes, Country Club housing, LAPD, Avenue 60, car-nage, and more

January 23, 2026

January 2026 Metro Board Round-Up: Sepulveda Rail Approved, Torrance Rail Kneecapped

Valley-Westside subway plan approved. South Bay light rail delayed significantly, perhaps indefinitely.

January 22, 2026

Thursday’s Headlines

ICE, crosswalks, bus lane enforcement, Sepulveda rail, Torrance rail, Long Beach, MacArthur Park, LADOT, and more

January 22, 2026

Extending the Foothill A Line Hasn’t Been Forgotten

Plans are underway to get the track built to Claremont, and stakeholders remain hopeful that Montclair can make a comeback.

January 21, 2026

Wednesday’s Headlines

ICE, Metro meeting tomorrow, Torrance, transit ambassadors, Santa Monica, Glendale, red light cameras, Koreatown, Long Beach parking, car-nage, and more

January 21, 2026

Uh Oh! Dueling Alignments Could Throw Torrance Metro Rail Extension into Limbo

Metro's plan for a four-mile light rail extension from Redondo Beach to Torrance could get a lot more difficult, and more expensive

January 20, 2026
See all posts