Skip to Content
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Log In
4341004500_c0ae87894e.jpgAre garages charging bike parking prices that the market is unlikely to bear? (Photo: Bicycles Only via Flickr)

Today on the Streetsblog Network, Traffic author Tom Vanderbilt writes at How We Drive
about the cost of bike parking at Manhattan garages. (New York’s larger
garages have been required to offer bike parking since late last year,
and they haven’t always been happy about it.)

Vanderbilt’s post is prompted by a piece in the Wall Street Journal about one East Side garage that is charging a cool $175 (plus tax)
for a monthly bike parking space. The WSJ’s Ralph Gardner basically
thanks the garage for charging so much because he’s terrified of riding
his bike in the city to begin with.

Vanderbilt wonders what kind of economic thinking is behind the garage’s decision to set such a high rate:

The first question that came to my mind was why it was so expensive
(when presumably you could fit upwards of a dozen bikes in a standard
car spot), and then, secondly, why garages would charge such a high
amount if no one seemed willing to pay it. Wouldn’t it better to make
half (or anything above) the theoretical profit than no profit at all?
I don’t know how these garages are set up, but if parking that bike
means having to have an attendant park and retrieve it for you, I
suppose the garages want to make sure the transaction costs are covered
— i.e., if they charged cyclists ten bucks a month but then had to send
attendants in search of bikes (when they could be retrieving more
lucrative cars). In other words, do they essentially charge that much
to not have to deal with the aggravation of dealing with parked bikes?

Good questions all. Has anyone out there found a good garage rate
for parking bikes in Manhattan? Or, perhaps more to the point, has
anyone out there found a garage that actually seems to see this as a
business opportunity rather than as an obligation to be avoided at any
cost? Will prices shake out if and when demand becomes more apparent?

By the way, Vanderbilt is hosting a very cool forum over at Slate called Nimble Cities.
Here’s the idea: They’re looking for smart new ideas about
transportation within and between cities. Submit your own brilliant
solution, vote on the ideas of others, and see what rises to the top.
Vanderbilt will write about the best concepts in more depth as the
month progresses.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog Los Angeles

“Disrespectful” and “infuriating”: L.A.’s progress on making streets safe and accessible for disabled people stalled for decades

Curb ramps have been required when repaving a street since 1992. Why is L.A. only now saying it must follow the law?

February 27, 2026

Friday’s Headlines

Metro D Line, Wilmington ped/bike bridge, parking, Carson, Pasadena, oil, WeHo, Downey, car-nage and more

February 27, 2026

SGV Bus Rapid Transit Gets Another $3.9M for Study and Design

Early improvements combine for about 14 miles of continuous bus lanes, expected to be installed in advance of the 2028 Olympic games

February 26, 2026

Metro D Line Subway Extension Will Open Friday May 8

Subway riders will be able to travel from Beverly Hills to Downtown L.A. in just 20 minutes

February 26, 2026

Thursday’s Headlines

ICE, LAPD, speed cameras, SB79, Santa Monica, charter reform, E Line, Beverly Hills, WeHo, car-nage, and more

February 26, 2026

Wednesday’s Headlines

Westwood, SB79, shade competition, Bundy TOD, Pasadena parking, car-nage, and more

February 25, 2026
See all posts