Skip to Content
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Log In
4341004500_c0ae87894e.jpgAre garages charging bike parking prices that the market is unlikely to bear? (Photo: Bicycles Only via Flickr)

Today on the Streetsblog Network, Traffic author Tom Vanderbilt writes at How We Drive
about the cost of bike parking at Manhattan garages. (New York’s larger
garages have been required to offer bike parking since late last year,
and they haven’t always been happy about it.)

Vanderbilt’s post is prompted by a piece in the Wall Street Journal about one East Side garage that is charging a cool $175 (plus tax)
for a monthly bike parking space. The WSJ’s Ralph Gardner basically
thanks the garage for charging so much because he’s terrified of riding
his bike in the city to begin with.

Vanderbilt wonders what kind of economic thinking is behind the garage’s decision to set such a high rate:

The first question that came to my mind was why it was so expensive
(when presumably you could fit upwards of a dozen bikes in a standard
car spot), and then, secondly, why garages would charge such a high
amount if no one seemed willing to pay it. Wouldn’t it better to make
half (or anything above) the theoretical profit than no profit at all?
I don’t know how these garages are set up, but if parking that bike
means having to have an attendant park and retrieve it for you, I
suppose the garages want to make sure the transaction costs are covered
— i.e., if they charged cyclists ten bucks a month but then had to send
attendants in search of bikes (when they could be retrieving more
lucrative cars). In other words, do they essentially charge that much
to not have to deal with the aggravation of dealing with parked bikes?

Good questions all. Has anyone out there found a good garage rate
for parking bikes in Manhattan? Or, perhaps more to the point, has
anyone out there found a garage that actually seems to see this as a
business opportunity rather than as an obligation to be avoided at any
cost? Will prices shake out if and when demand becomes more apparent?

By the way, Vanderbilt is hosting a very cool forum over at Slate called Nimble Cities.
Here’s the idea: They’re looking for smart new ideas about
transportation within and between cities. Submit your own brilliant
solution, vote on the ideas of others, and see what rises to the top.
Vanderbilt will write about the best concepts in more depth as the
month progresses.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog Los Angeles

Friday’s Headlines

Valley-Westside rail, South Bay rail, transit-oriented housing, green WeHo bike lanes, Country Club housing, LAPD, Avenue 60, car-nage, and more

January 23, 2026

January 2026 Metro Board Round-Up: Sepulveda Rail Approved, Torrance Rail Kneecapped

Valley-Westside subway plan approved. South Bay light rail delayed significantly, perhaps indefinitely.

January 22, 2026

Thursday’s Headlines

ICE, crosswalks, bus lane enforcement, Sepulveda rail, Torrance rail, Long Beach, MacArthur Park, LADOT, and more

January 22, 2026

Extending the Foothill A Line Hasn’t Been Forgotten

Plans are underway to get the track built to Claremont, and stakeholders remain hopeful that Montclair can make a comeback.

January 21, 2026

Wednesday’s Headlines

ICE, Metro meeting tomorrow, Torrance, transit ambassadors, Santa Monica, Glendale, red light cameras, Koreatown, Long Beach parking, car-nage, and more

January 21, 2026

Uh Oh! Dueling Alignments Could Throw Torrance Metro Rail Extension into Limbo

Metro's plan for a four-mile light rail extension from Redondo Beach to Torrance could get a lot more difficult, and more expensive

January 20, 2026
See all posts