Skip to Content
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Log In

Should Transit Charge More During Peak Hours?

7:25 AM PDT on May 7, 2010

338846804_cb792de790.jpgShould peak-hour Metro commuters pay a surcharge in the most congested part of the system? (Photo: roboppy via Flickr)

This morning on the Streetsblog Network, there’s a lively and intelligent discussion going on at Jarrett Walker’s Human Transit over the question "Should fares be higher during peak hours?"

The Human Transit post was sparked by an earlier discussion at Yonah Freemark’s blog, The Transport Politic,
about the possibility of peak surcharges on Washington, D.C.’s Metro
system (it already costs more to ride Metro at peak times; the proposal
in question is for an additional 50-cent charge in the most congested
part of the system).

Walker thinks such charges could be a good thing:

There’s also an argument for peak surcharging that connects with
urbanist goals for transit. People who have the option of traveling
off-peak should be encouraged to do so, because off-peak capacity is
usually abundant, while peak capacity is naturally scarce and costly
for the transit agency. This strategy helps build off-peak patronage,
which supports more all-day service, which leads directly to transit
that is more relevant to the entire life of the city rather than just
the commute. All-day frequent service is the only type of service that
can support transit-oriented development and thus change the shape of
the city in more sustainable ways.  From an urbanist perspective, then,
a gentle but persistent effort to shift demand away from the peak makes

I have trouble even seeing a social justice argument against peak
surcharges, as the average peak-period traveler usually has a higher
income than an average midday traveler (because lower-paying jobs,
mostly in service industries, are less likely to start and end on the
usual peak). So insisting on flat fares all day could actually be seen
as regressive.

Be sure to check out both original posts for a well-reasoned debate on the topic.

More from around the network: Totcycle proposes a "Bike to School Across America" competition. Seattle Transit Blog previews Mayor Mike McGinn’s forthcoming "Walk Bike Ride" initiative. And Broken Sidewalk
has a little snippet about a college basketball player who wouldn’t get
into a car during March Madness — because he recognized how dangerous
it can be.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog Los Angeles

Friday Bikeways Update: Beach Bike Path Damage, 7th Street, and More

Updates on: beach bike path in Pacific Palisades, Michigan Greenway in Santa Monica, Parthenia Place in North Hills, 7th Street Streetscape in DTLA, and Imperial Highway near LAX

March 1, 2024

Measure HLA Fact Check: Sidewalk Costs

The city says $200 million worth of annual ADA work is "included in the cost" of Measure HLA, but the city is already on the hook for that ADA work anyway, so none of it should be included as HLA costs

March 1, 2024

Supervisor Hahn Calls for No Residential Demolitions in Metro’s 710 Freeway Corridor Project

"[For 710 Freeway expansion] Metro needs to commit itself to zero residential property takes. [Metro] should have as one its top priorities ensuring that our projects do not result in kicking people out of their homes."

February 29, 2024
See all posts