Skip to Content
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Log In
Federal Transportation Bill

Inhofe Questions Transit and Bike-Ped Investments in House Transport Bill

10:50 AM PDT on March 18, 2010

The senior Republican on the Senate environment panel today criticized the House's six-year transportation bill,
lamenting that the measure "focus[es] very heavily on transit, bike
paths, and sidewalks" and carves out a strong federal role in
"decisions historically left to the state level."

Inhofe's concerns, raised at the latest in the environment
committee's series of hearings aimed at marshaling consensus for a new
long-term transport bill, suggest that the increased transit, bike-ped,
and urban policy investments envisioned by the House measure could face
resistance from rural senators who fear less of a federal emphasis on

"We cannot grow the program in urban areas while
ignoring the
rural component," Sen. John Barrasso (R-WY) said, describing rail and
bike usage as "geographically and climatically prohibitive" in his
state, currently the nation's least-populated.

committee chief Barbara Boxer (D-CA) assured Barrasso that "I don't
look at writing this bill as rural versus urban." Yet the House
legislation offered by transportation committee chairman Jim Oberstar
(D-MN) would direct significant funding to urban infrastructure needs
through a new metropolitan mobility program, a prospect that appeared
to unsettle rural lawmakers.

"I don't feel like transit is
a great option in our rural areas," said Oklahoma state senator Bryce
Marlatt, an invited witness. After Inhofe questioned the Oberstar
framework's emphasis on bike-ped and transit spending, Marlatt warned
that the House plan could prevent rural areas from joining "the global
economy" by boosting road spending.

perspectives were offered by John Robert Smith, president of the
transit advocacy group Reconnecting America, and Scott Haggerty, a
supervisor in California's Alameda County who appeared on behalf of the
National Association of Counties (NACo).

told senators that the green-transport and land-use grants offered by
the Obama administration's multi-agency sustainability office should be
open to cities with populations of 50,000 or below, giving rural areas
more of an opportunity to compete for federal aid.

for his part, noted that the "overwhelming majority of congestion comes
in metro areas" and advised that any project getting funding from
Oberstar's proposed urban mobility program should be able to document
its benefits for commuters.

Even as the rural-urban debate
unfolded, senators sought to steer the hearing towards the fundamental
issue stalling progress on a replacement for the 2005 federal
transportation law: how to pay for it.

terms of infrastructure, our roads and bridges are not getting any
better if we neglect them," Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) said. "We're
going to have to address this problem one way or another; we might as
well do it and create jobs."

Asked for their thoughts
on transportation financing, Haggerty said NACo would back a gas-tax
increase -- an option ruled out by the White House for the foreseeable
future -- and Smith cited a poll commissioned by Transportation for
America that found public support for more infrastructure spending,
provided that it was approved in a transparent fashion.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog Los Angeles

Metro September 2023 Board Committee Round-Up: C Line, 91 Freeway Widening, and More

Transit ridership and freeway funding are up. $14 million for MicroTransit was postponed. South Bay C Line extension draws both controversy and support. Law enforcement, Taylor Swift, bus lanes, and more!

September 23, 2023

Input Meetings Starting This Weekend for Ballona Creek “Finish the Creek” Extension Study

Learn more and give your ideas for extending the Ballona Creek bike/walk path upstream through Culver City and into Mid-City Los Angeles

September 21, 2023

Guest Opinion: Metro Should Treat Walk and Bike Projects with the Respect They Deserve

Prioritizing true first mile/last mile infrastructure isn’t somehow optional; it’s how your customers get to and from the transit stations.

September 21, 2023
See all posts