Skip to Content
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Log In
Bob Blumenfield

L.A. City Council Planning Committee Approves Motion to End Road Widening

L.A. spot widening via Google Street View

This afternoon, the L.A. City Council Planning and Land Use Management (PLUM) Committee unanimously approved a motion to end automatic spot road widenings. The motion (council file 22-1476) was authored by City Councilmembers Nithya Raman, Bob Blumenfield, and former Councilmember Mike Bonin. The motion had been approved by the council's Public Works Committee in January.

Safe streets advocates have long opposed the city's counter-productive "street dedications" which impair housing affordability, street safety, historic preservation, and more. Currently, for many streets, the city requires that properties automatically dedicate more and more space to cars every time new buildings are built. Hundreds of miles of street widening are included in the city’s Mobility Plan, where it isn’t “aspirational” like bike and bus facilities.

By itself, the motion does not actually end road widening. It sets up a process whereby city departments get together to outline what changes are needed to end the widening process; the city council would still have to approve those changes. Specifically the motion directs the Bureau of Engineering (BOE), Department of City Planning (DCP), the Department of Transportation (LADOT), DCP’s Urban Design Studio, and other relevant departments, to report back with recommendations to “eliminate spot road widenings” and instead prioritize “pedestrian safety and visibility,” to “protect existing trees and parkways,” and to “ensure accessibility for people with disabilities.” The city's default would no longer be automatically widening streets, but the process would allow exceptions for “specific traffic safety or mobility benefits, such as closing a bike lane gap or eliminating a pinch point.”

Today's approval means the motion goes next to the full city council. After that approval, city departments would report back within sixty days with their recommendations.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog Los Angeles

Metro L.A. River Path Project: Delays and Rising Costs

It will likely take leadership from L.A. City and L.A. County elected officials to get Metro's L.A. River path project out of the limbo it has been trapped in for the last half-decade

October 1, 2025

Last Chance for Input on La Puente’s Housing Element Update

Take the survey: building rule changes allow for faster home development, including on church grounds, commercially zoned land, and to replace lost affordable housing

September 30, 2025

SGV Connect 141: Foothill Transit’s New Route and the Legislative Session Comes to an End

A new Foothill Transit bus line does more than just serve the A Line stations, and a wrap of the last legislative session.

September 29, 2025
See all posts