Skip to Content
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Log In
Federal Transportation Bill

What Happened to the Proposed ‘Transportation Tax’ on Wall Street?

8:08 AM PDT on April 5, 2010

For several weeks last fall, as members of the House infrastructure
committee pushed for passage of a new six-year federal transportation
bill as a strategy to rouse the economy from recession, a proposal to pay for the legislation with a small tax on oil futures trades attracted a healthy crop of Democratic cosponsors and some vocal pushback from Wall Street.

defazio.jpgRep.
Pete DeFazio (D-OR), at left, joined Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA) to
introduce a Wall Street transaction tax in December. (Photo: AP/Oregonian)

But
the tax proposal has since lost steam in Washington transportation
debate, getting little notice from lawmakers who strongly support
taking up a new six-year infrastructure bill in 2010 even as it remains
a magnet for progressives looking to rein in financial industry
excesses.

What happened to the idea of using an oil futures
transaction fee -- set at 0.02 percent in a December bill offered by
Rep. Pete DeFazio (D-OR) and Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA) -- to fund
long-term federal transportation projects?

Jim Berard,
spokesman for the House infrastructure panel, explained in an interview
late last week that the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) had conducted
a preliminary analysis that found the transaction tax would raise less
money than lawmakers had initially hoped. The reason for the
lower-than-expected revenue, Berard said, was the rationale hinted at by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) in November: a tax levied only on domestic futures would end up pushing trades overseas.

"What sounded like a really good solution six months
ago turned out to be not as good as we thought, and just not as viable," Berard told Streetsblog Capitol Hill.

That
leaves federal transportation policymakers essentially where they were
at this time last year, searching for a politically feasible stand-in
for a gas tax increase that the White House and congressional
Democratic leaders have both ruled out for now.

Even
as raising the gas tax to pay for transport legislation remains
unpopular, senators are preparing to release a new climate change bill
later this month that would impose
a new "linked fee" on motor fuel. Such a fee could be used in part to
fund new infrastructure projects, but Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), one
of the architects of the new climate measure, told The Hill last month that most of the resulting revenue would be sent back to drivers in the form of rebates.

The infrastructure panel's highways and transit subcommittee, chaired by DeFazio, plans a hearing
next week on "innovative financing" strategies, and Berard said panel
chairman Jim Oberstar (D-MN) continues to search for a revenue plan
that can unify the capital's disparate transportation players -- House
and Senate leaders, the U.S. DOT, the White House, state DOTs, reform
groups, and transit advocates.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog Los Angeles

Eyes on the Street: Slow Streets in South Pasadena

The city has a sampler platter of quick-build temporary traffic calming installations to experience for the rest of the year

September 20, 2023

Metro Board Looks to Approve $65 Million for 91 Freeway Widening Projects

Metro staff are recommending the board approve funds to support two 91 Freeway expansion projects located in pollution-burdened communities in Southeast L.A. County - in the cities of Long Beach, Artesia, and Cerritos

September 19, 2023

This Week In Livable Streets

Move Your Way open streets in San Fernando, South Bay C Line, LADOT finalizes recommendations for unarmed traffic response, a Leimert Park book launch, Arroyo Seco, Ballona Creek, Metro K Line extension, and more.

September 18, 2023
See all posts