Skip to Content
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Log In
Metrolink

California’s Senators Want Better Signals for Rail Safety

9_17_08_feinstein.jpgIn the wake of last week's Metrolink disaster there has been a lot of discussion about what impact more modern signals could have had in preventing the crash.  Today, the Times revealed that Metrolink had been an outspoken critic of Congressional efforts to require better signalization for all train tracks.

That resistance has spurred Senator Diane Weinstein to introduce legislation that would require the installation of what she terms life saving signals by 2014.  Feinstein's bill, co-sponsored by Barbara Boxer, combines the language of two similar pieces of legislation passed in the House of Representatives and Senate respectively, that have yet to be combined into a single piece of legislation by a conference committee.

In a statement to the press, Feinstein calls the lack of what she calls a "positive train control system" a sign of negligence and the major reason for the crash.

“Thefact is, this collision could have been avoided had there been apositive train control system in place. In my view, that’s sheernegligence.

“And it should be totally unacceptable to the Americanpeople that we have rail systems in which two trains going in oppositedirections share a single track – with only a signal light to stop acollision – when technology exists to prevent a crash. This legislationwill fix this. Nowhere is this needed more than in Southern California,where the majority of Metrolink’s 388 miles of track are shared withfreight trains. We must install positive train control as quickly aspossible. There is no excuse for inaction.”

One question that isn't answered in either the bill or the press statement: if these signals could save so many lives, why isn't the federal government offering some financial assistance to get them put in place quicker than six years from now?

Photo: Times

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog Los Angeles

What’s Next for Measure HLA, in the Face of Metro Opposition?

This is probably something a judge would need to decide at some point

March 21, 2025

Metro Lawyers Up Against Measure HLA, Tells L.A. City that Metro Projects Don’t Require Planned Bus/Bike/Walk Improvements

Metro: "any attempt to enforce [Measure HLA] against Metro is beyond the City's legal authority, and Metro will challenge any such attempt."

March 19, 2025

Metro Tests Foothill A Line Extension, Authority Prepares to Construct Next Segment

Emergency drills are being practiced and vital systems double checked while a final price tag and start date are being worked out for Pomona to Montclair.

March 19, 2025
See all posts