Judge Rules Against BRU and NRDC. Fare Hikes Don’t Require EIS.

8_26_08_signs.jpgThe Bottleneck Blog reports that yesterday a Superior Court Judge ruled that Metro did not violate any laws when they raised fares last July without first completing an environmental review.  The thrust of the case was that because fare increases cause fewer people to ride transit, the increases will result in greater air pollution as more people turn to the automobile.

California law has a clear exemption from environmental reviews provided that the agency can show that the increased funds are going to operating costs.  However, the NRDC argued that you could see the clear effects of the increase on passengers.  Even while Metro rail experiences record ridership numbers, bus ridership has decreased 5%.

David Petit explains the basics in NRDC’s press release:

“Today’s ruling means more people will be forced to take potentially
more polluting forms of transportation to work, school or church. MTA
should make it easier, not harder, for riders to use public
transportation. When people switch from buses to cars due to higher bus
fares, the result will be dirtier air. There’s no question that the
cost of a bus ride impacts the environment."

There is no word from either the NRDC or the Bus Rider’s Union on whether or not there will be an appeal.

Photo: Damien Newton

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

What Factors Are Causing Metro’s Declining Ridership? What Next?

|
In my circles, there has been a lot of discussion swirling around Wednesday’s Los Angeles Times article, Billions spent, but fewer people are using public transportation in Southern California, by Laura Nelson and Dan Weikel. The Times’ authors cast a disparaging light on recent downturns in ridership: “Despite a $9-billion investment in new light rail […]

BRU: No Fare Hikes Without Public Process

|
Image of "Times": Strategy Center/Flickr Earlier this morning, the Bus Rider’s Union rallied at the Wilshire/Western Transit Station to urge the Metro Board to not go forward with planned fare hikes for Metro bus and rail services until a full public hearing schedule is announced and executed. In May of 2007, the Metro Board adopted […]

Metro Fare Increase Modification Motion by Garcetti, Zev, and MRT

|
Just when it looked like this Thursday’s Metro board meeting would just see its high-stakes up-or-down vote on proposed fare increases, a new wrinkle emerges: a new Metro board motion [pdf] by Mayor Eric Garcetti and Supervisors Zev Yaroslavsky and Mark Ridley-Thomas. The bottom line on the motion is that a 25-cent fare increase would […]

Spinning a Civil Rights Complaint

|
Late last week, most likely in response to a report by the Bus Riders Union and their community allies, a letter from Metro CEO Art Leahy dismissing the Civil Rights complaints of the BRU appeared on The Source.  The letter basically announced that the Title VI complaints against the agency announced last Spring were dismissed, […]

Editorial: Why Raise Metro Fares While Giving Away Metro Parking?

|
Metro is proposing to increase, or restructure, its $1.50 base transit fare to $1.75 later this year, with further increases planned in 2017 and 2020. Metro anticipates that this will increase its fare recovery – the percentage of operations costs that are paid for by fare revenues – from 25 percent to 33 percent. Metro foresees […]