Skip to Content
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Log In
Metro

Judge Rules Against BRU and NRDC. Fare Hikes Don’t Require EIS.

8_26_08_signs.jpgThe Bottleneck Blog reports that yesterday a Superior Court Judge ruled that Metro did not violate any laws when they raised fares last July without first completing an environmental review.  The thrust of the case was that because fare increases cause fewer people to ride transit, the increases will result in greater air pollution as more people turn to the automobile.

California law has a clear exemption from environmental reviews provided that the agency can show that the increased funds are going to operating costs.  However, the NRDC argued that you could see the clear effects of the increase on passengers.  Even while Metro rail experiences record ridership numbers, bus ridership has decreased 5%.

David Petit explains the basics in NRDC's press release:

“Today’s ruling means more people will be forced to take potentiallymore polluting forms of transportation to work, school or church. MTAshould make it easier, not harder, for riders to use publictransportation. When people switch from buses to cars due to higher busfares, the result will be dirtier air. There’s no question that thecost of a bus ride impacts the environment."

There is no word from either the NRDC or the Bus Rider's Union on whether or not there will be an appeal.

Photo: Damien Newton

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog Los Angeles

Friday’s Headlines

ICE terror escalating, Vision Zero failing, gondola, Olympics, Metro water taxi, NIMBYs vs. housing, car-nage and more

December 5, 2025

Thursday’s Headlines

ICE, bus lane enforcement, HLA appeals, L.A. vs. SB79, LAPD, Metro December 14 service changes, Camino City Terrace, Norwalk, Ontario, Culver City, Canoga Park, car-nage and more

December 4, 2025

San Bernardino Could Finally End One of Country’s Worst Zombie Projects: The ONT Connector

“The ONT Connector is an inappropriate investment. Ridership capacity and public transportation utility do not support spending billions of dollars for it. Scrapping the project is the right decision. Electric rail to ONT is the appropriate decision,” per The Transit Coalition

December 3, 2025

Wednesday’s Headlines

ICE, CicLAvia sponsorship, UCLA to E Line, South Pasadena, Santa Monica, Pasadena, car-nage, and more

December 3, 2025

Support Streetsblog L.A. Today for a Better 2026

As 2025 comes to a close, we’re asking for your support to keep independent, people-centered transportation journalism alive in Los Angeles.

December 2, 2025
See all posts