Skip to Content
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Log In

Metro FY21 Mid-Year Budget Adjustment: More Money than Expected, but None to Restore Cut Transit Service

Metro bus graphic by Metro

Metro has unexpected revenue, but the agency is bending over backward to avoid spending a penny on restored transit service.

When COVID hit last year, Metro sales tax revenue dropped, leaving a hole in Metro's budget. Metro received some relief - $846 million - from the initial CARES Act federal stimulus. The agency undertook several cost-saving measures, including cutting bus service by 20 percent in September 2020. At the time, riders spoke out against the cuts. Metro CEO Phil Washington and operations staff assured boardmembers that the agency could scale service back up responding to crowding and rebounding ridership. The Metro board passed a motion directing staff to report back every other month on how the agency plans to restore service.

This week, Metro finances are looking better than projected - primarily due to better-than-anticipated sales tax revenues. The board Finance Committee voted to approve a mid-year budget adjustment (staff report, presentation) that adds back $765 million to the remaining months of the fiscal year. There is also $34.3 million that had been budgeted to pay for debt, but refinancing made that money available now. The total midyear budget increase is nearly $800 million.

Metro will also soon receive $750-850 million from the second round of federal stimulus, approved in December.

(Can't count these chickens yet, but newly inaugurated President Joe Biden is pushing for even more COVID stimulus. As of now, the next stimulus bill proposes $20 billion for transit systems nationwide.)

With more than $1.5 billion in unexpected funds, Metro must be putting back some of that bus service, right?


Metro hasn't programmed the $750+million in federal stimulus monies, but there is a staff proposal for the $765+million in extra local revenue. Of that, $741 million would go to capital projects. Just $58.6 million would be funneled toward operations, but would not actually increase transit service.

Metro plans to spend xxx million without xxxx
Metro plans to increase its operations budget by $58 million without increasing transit service at all - via Metro presentation
Metro plans to spend xxx million without xxxx

Metro proposes to spend operations money on State of Good Repair ($24 million), "other operational needs" ($15 million - see description in chart above), additional MicroTransit and NextGen bus speed improvements ($10 million. It's unclear why these unrelated expenses are bundled; and bus lanes are cheap), a Customer Experience ambassador pilot ($4.9 million), and staffing up for the Regional Connector opening in 2022 ($4.4 million.)

To some extent, the predominance of spending on capital projects is baked into Metro's sales tax measures, which earmark percentages for various types of expenditures.

There is some flexibility, however. Metro is choosing to avoid funding bus service in that $58.6 million. Why choose to fund converting the agency's expensive Mobility-on-Demand pilot into its expensive MicroTransit pilot? Why prioritize staffing recruitment for the 2022 opening of the Regional Connector during the current budget crisis? Why not target more of the customer relations pilot when customers return? What's the deadline for building out lactation rooms (mandated by a newly-passed California law)? Surely if there is the political will to provide for bus riders, there are millions - perhaps tens of millions - that could be directed toward restored service.

Metro transit operations leadership appears to be betting on depressed ridership continuing through the end of fiscal year - June 30, 2021. This is likely to mean infrequent bus and rail service, leading to overcrowding as the county gradually recovers from COVID.

As COVID spiked, Metro ridership declined from a COVID high of 615,000 in October to 475,000 in December, but is already rebounding in January.

Recent Metro transit ridership graphed - via Metro presentation. At the Operations Committee meeting this morning, Metro Chief Operations Officer James Gallagher stated that January ridership had rebounded to 565,000.
Recent Metro transit ridership - via Metro presentation

One reason that ridership is down and one complication in restoring cut bus service is that COVID is currently impacting Metro's operations workforce.

On top of the cuts, Metro is reporting missed service due to increased employee absenteeism (a broad category that includes illness, vacation, etc.). At this morning's Operations Committee, Metro Chief Operations Officer James Gallagher reported that operations staff absenteeism increased from a pre-COVID average of 31.6 percent to 46.1 percent during 2020. Gallagher reported that Metro is currently recruiting new bus operators, though he also stated that it takes eight weeks to train staff before they operate a bus. The lag time means that it will be difficult to ramp up bus service as ridership returns.

The revised mid-year budget item (with no additional bus service) was approved by the Metro Finance Committee yesterday, but still needs final approval from the full board at its meeting next Thursday, January 28.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog Los Angeles

Long Beach Leads in Traffic Circles

Traffic circles aren't quite ubiquitous in Long Beach, but they're around. Riding and walking through the city one encounters circles in neighborhoods rich and poor, new and old.

July 12, 2024

Metro and Caltrans Still Planning 605 Expansion, Plus Four Connecting Freeways

Metro and Caltrans are planning to spend billions of dollars widening the 605, 5, 10, 60 and 105 Freeways. Really.

July 10, 2024
See all posts