Skip to content

What Mandatory Parking Requirements Cost L.A. Renters

Parking minimum requirements raise L.A. apartment rent by about $200 per month, whether a renter drives or not.
4:40 PM PDT on July 25, 2017
What Mandatory Parking Requirements Cost L.A. Renters
Photo via WIkipedia/Rachmaninoff
This article supported by Los Angeles Bicycle Attorney. Click on the bar for more information.
This article supported by Los Angeles Bicycle Attorney as part of a general sponsorship package. All opinions in the article are that of the author, and do not necessarily reflect those of LABA. Click on the ad for more information.

There is a new article making the rounds that sheds light on the true cost of providing parking in Los Angeles. The article is “If you’re renting a US city apartment without a car, 16% of your rent pays for parking you don’t need” by Michael J. Coren.

Most Streetsblog readers may be aware that one-size-fits-all parking requirements end up creating excessive parking, especially in urban centers. Though there are exceptions, the city of L.A. typically requires 2 to 2.5 parking spaces per housing unit. Generally, whether or not they own a car, renters typically pay the cost of building and maintaining that parking.

Coren cites a couple of studies that quantify parking costs. A 2016 study by C.J. Gabbe and Gregory Pierce found that garage parking costs renter households “approximately $1,700 per year, or an additional 17% of a housing unit’s rent.” The study estimates that overall in the United States carless renters pay $440 million annually for parking that they do not use. Coren, Gabbe, and Pierce point to the equity implications of  “this transport cost burden being effectively hidden in housing prices” stressing that required parking “imposes a steep cost on carless renters—commonly the lowest income households—who may be paying for parking that they do not need or want.”

Coren also cites a 2013 study by Michael Manville which found that Los Angeles City “parking minimums raised apartment prices by about $200 per month and price of a condo by about $43,000.”

Note that these are just direct costs to renters and owners. Parking requirements also drive up the cost of building new housing, resulting in fewer units actually getting built. The reduced supply also indirectly drives up the cost of renting or owning.

What is the solution?  Gabbe and Pierce suggest two policy changes that would help:

  • Cities should reduce or eliminate minimum parking requirements. This is already happening in a number of places, including central L.A, Lancaster, Buffalo, and Mexico City.
  • Cities should allow and encourage landlords to unbundle parking costs from housing costs – ie: instead of just charging a lump sum for renting both housing and parking, renters should pay separately for housing and for each parking space needed.

Streetsblog has migrated to a new comment system. New commenters can register directly in the comments section of any article. Returning commenters: your previous comments and display name have been preserved, but you'll need to reclaim your account by clicking "Forgot your password?" on the sign-in form, entering your email, and following the verification link to set a new password — this is required because passwords could not be carried over during the migration. For questions, contact tips@streetsblog.org.

More from Streetsblog Los Angeles

After Reelection Loss, Chair Fernando Dutra to Leave Metro Board

April 15, 2026

Wednesday’s Headlines

April 15, 2026

Check Out ‘Wilshire Subway’ Book and Exhibition

April 14, 2026

Tuesday’s Headlines

April 14, 2026

New Lawsuit and Denied Appeals Highlight Ongoing Fight Over Measure HLA Implementation

April 13, 2026
See all posts