Fresno City Council Slams the Brakes on BRT

The route already barely qualified as bus rapid transit under federal regulations, as it had almost no dedicated right-of-way. The system would have included some prioritization for buses at stop lights, off-board payment and real-time travel information at enhanced bus shelters, as well as frequent service along important east-west and north-south routes.

But Barker said the system had become a target of local sprawl developers who allied themselves with Tea Party activists. The real target of the opposition, she says, wasn't BRT but a general plan adopted by the city in 2012 that called for dramatically limiting sprawl and promoting walkable development in urban areas. Beefing up transit was critical to the proposal, and last night some elected leaders indicated they thought the two-year-old plan needed to be overhauled.

"A lot of the comment on City Council was saying the comprehensive plan for our region is unrealistic because no one wants to live in south Fresno," she said, adding that that statement has a lot of racial implications. "They want a new general plan and they want more land for low-density development."

Barker said sources told her there would probably need to be more "political horse trading" behind the scenes. Council members representing the city's poorer southern side supported the project, but those in the richer northern areas came down against BRT.

Project supporters who packed the meeting were glum.

"Always refreshing to see the Fresno City Council completely misunderstanding the challenges and trends of the 21st century," one observer remarked sarcastically during the meeting.  Said another: "Really hate being bummed about my city and how too many people in charge are not smart enough to let it become better."