Skip to content
Sponsored

Taxi Contract Controversy at Transportation Committee Wednesday

Photo, by Joe Linton, from the L.A. Taxi Workers Alliance protest at City Hall in August The agenda for this Wednesday’s Los Angeles City Council Transportation Committee includes an important hearing on the future of Los Angeles’ taxi system. As is evident in cities throughout the world, taxis can play an important role in providing a healthy … Continued
4:16 PM PDT on September 21, 2009
9_21_09_taxi.jpg
Photo, by Joe Linton, from the L.A. Taxi Workers Alliance protest at City Hall in August

The agenda for this Wednesday’s Los Angeles City Council Transportation Committee includes an important hearing on the future of Los Angeles’ taxi system.

As is evident in cities throughout the world, taxis can play an important role in providing a healthy balance of transportation options. Taxis are considered a public utitlity, hence are regulated
tightly by the city. Taxis’ effectiveness is hindered by L.A.’s byzantine system of taxi regulations. Numerous issues in the taxi industry have been raised by studies including UCLA’s Driving Poor and the Los Angeles Taxi Workers’ Alliance’s Sweatshops on Wheels.

In late 2008, the city issued a Request For Proposals (RFP) for a consultant to review the current taxi system and to make recommendations on how to resolve problems. The review is targeted to
be completed so that feedback can be incorporated in to the system before the city revisits existing taxi franchises due to expire in December 2010.

The City Council directed the LADOT to report back with their recommendations for the council to review, but that process went out the window this summer. The Los Angeles Department of Transportation made the determination that, despite the council’s specifications, LADOT could select a consultant, bypass the City Council and Taxi Commission, and go straight to Mayor Villaraigosa. In July, LADOT and the Mayor’s office awarded the $250,000 taxi consultant contract to Nelson/Nygaard and its team leader Will Rodman. Rodman worked with the city in 2000 to craft the current system that has so many problems.

LADOT’s lack of transparency triggered protests by taxi drivers, calling for the contract to be rescinded. Councilmembers Alarcon and Rosendahl initiated a motion (08-0531-s1) requesting that LADOT appear before the Transportation Committee this week to explain why the council and the public were excluded from the contract approval process.

Streetsblog has migrated to a new comment system. New commenters can register directly in the comments section of any article. Returning commenters: your previous comments and display name have been preserved, but you'll need to reclaim your account by clicking "Forgot your password?" on the sign-in form, entering your email, and following the verification link to set a new password — this is required because passwords could not be carried over during the migration. For questions, contact tips@streetsblog.org.

More from Streetsblog Los Angeles

Wednesday’s Headlines

April 22, 2026

The Week In Livable Streets

April 21, 2026

Tuesday’s Headlines

April 21, 2026

Metro Still Planning 605 Freeway Widening Mega-Project, Additional $46.9M Slated to be Approved This Week

April 20, 2026

Monday’s Headlines

April 20, 2026
See all posts