Skip to Content
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Log In
DC Streetsblog

Audit Finds U.S. DOT’s Transit Record-Keeping ‘Unreliable,’ ‘Inaccurate’

1:42 PM PDT on August 6, 2009

The disjointed state of "New Starts," the Federal Transit Administration's (FTA) program to fund new rail and bus lines, is well-known
on the Hill -- in fact, House transportation committee chairman Jim
Oberstar (D-MN) recently quipped that it ought to be renamed "small
starts, low starts, and no starts."

Oberstar's six-year transportation re-write bill in limbo for the
moment, however, there appears to be scant political urgency to fix the
program. But a report released today by the non-partisan Government
Accountability Office (GAO) could help change that picture.

It can take as long as 14 years for transit planners to secure a
full-funding New Starts grant agreement (FFGA), the final stage
required before starting construction. Yet when GAO auditors set out to
break the process down by its stages (which are depicted in a comically
complex chart after the jump) they found the FTA could only provide
complete information for 9 out of 40 New Starts projects approved since

"We were unable to obtain complete and reliable
project milestone data from FTA," GAO auditors wrote. An attempt to
confirm records for a random sample of 10 New Starts projects found the
information to be "unreliable and, in some cases, inaccurate."

The GAO report then outlined the FTA's explanation for its inconsistent data:

First,FTA told us that it does not have records on when a project beginsalternatives analysis because this phase is conducted at the locallevel, generally without FTA involvement. Second, FTA told us that itdoes not record when a project sponsor submits an application forpreliminary engineering, final design, and FFGA because projectsponsors almost never submit complete applications.

bureaucratic hurdles that transit planners must clear to win federal
aid stand in stark contrast to road projects' usually unobstructed path
to approval. But without solid data to make the case for fixing New
Starts, transit advocates' already arduous political fight for fairer
treatment is likely to get even harder.

The GAO report can be downloaded in full here.


Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog Los Angeles

Metro September 2023 Board Committee Round-Up: C Line, 91 Freeway Widening, and More

Transit ridership and freeway funding are up. $14 million for MicroTransit was postponed. South Bay C Line extension draws both controversy and support. Law enforcement, Taylor Swift, bus lanes, and more!

September 23, 2023

Input Meetings Starting This Weekend for Ballona Creek “Finish the Creek” Extension Study

Learn more and give your ideas for extending the Ballona Creek bike/walk path upstream through Culver City and into Mid-City Los Angeles

September 21, 2023

Guest Opinion: Metro Should Treat Walk and Bike Projects with the Respect They Deserve

Prioritizing true first mile/last mile infrastructure isn’t somehow optional; it’s how your customers get to and from the transit stations.

September 21, 2023
See all posts