Skip to Content
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Log In

Maybe it's not such a "done-deal" after all.

Mayor Villaraigosa and Councilman Jack Weiss, the two elected proponents of speeding up traffic on Pico and Olympic Boulevards at the expense of local businesses and non-motorized travel, were dealt a setback yesterday when a Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge ruled that the city needs to study the impacts of the project before moving forward.  To read the ruling, click here.

The Pico-Olympic project has caused heated debate since Villaraigosa announced it last fall. Controversy over the project wasn't just spurred by businesses being scared by a loss of parking at rush hours, but also by a "press conference over policy" approach to lawmaking. Residents were furious that they didn't hear about the plan until watching it on the news or reading it in the newspaper after a press conference. As more details on the plan were released, such as the traffic counts were completed on a Jewish Holiday, the community grew more incensed and pleaded with their Councilmembers to kill the project.

Attempts by the City Council to discuss the proposal were effectively tabled when Villaraigosa declared that the plan was moving forward and he didn't need the council's approval. In a perceived slap to Councilmember Bill Rosendahl, the most recent revision included the entirety of the roads in Rosendahl's district while cutting out the part of the plan in Councilmember Herb Wesson's district.

Villaraigosa declared that the plan would go into effect the first weekend in March. It was then delayed until the end of March after local business groups filed suit. Most recently, the plan was set to go into motion "later this week."

City Watch reports that the lack of a public process wasn't lost on the judge.

"The undisputed evidence is that City Council Transportation Committee meetings on the proposed activity were abruptly suspended and the City's Department of Transportation was instructed to implement "phase one" of the plan by the Mayor."

"In this instance," Judge Torribio went on, "where the city has not prepared any environmental document."

So what's next for the Pico-Olympic Plan? The Times reports that the Mayor's Office is still debating whether or not to appeal the decision, but in the meantime will begin an environmental review that could take 6 months to a year to complete.

A third option to get the plan moving again would be if the City Council declared that the project had no significant impact. After the Mayor's snub last winter, it's hard to see that taking place. Maybe steam rolling all concerns in a typical "design and defend" campaign wasn't the best idea after all.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog Los Angeles

L.A. Street Vendors Celebrate Removal of No-Vending Restrictions in Huge Win Against City

The victory is the product of a decade-plus-long battle to legalize sidewalk vending on our city streets

July 23, 2024

This Week In Livable Streets

East L.A. Food Bicycle Tour #3, Metro/Caltrans 91 freeway expansion, Metro board meeting, C Line delays, Metro East Valley light rail, and the Citywide Housing Incentive Program Ordinance

July 22, 2024

Metro and Caltrans Expect to Complete Torrance 405 Freeway Widening Project Next Month

Metro and Caltrans are adding nearly two miles of new auxiliary freeway lanes, a new on-ramp, and widening adjacent streets including Crenshaw Boulevard and 182nd Street

July 19, 2024
See all posts