Blogs Are Buzzing on Metro’s Long Range Plan


Metro is working hard to promote public participation in the Draft Long Range Transportation Plan launching a new media campaign, and devoting tomorrow’s "Online Chat With Board Chair Pam O’Connor" to planning. So far, feedback, both positive and negative, is occuring daily on blogs and message boards around the Internet.  While Metro may be looking to take the discussion from the web to the mainstream, the debate between Metro’s fans and detractors online can yield questions and comments worth considering.

Curbed L.A. and LAist were two of the first to review the Long Range Plan, and each took a very different position. In addition to listing the Tier 1 and Tier 2 unfunded projects, Curbed promoted the meat of the plan, calling it "juicy." Curbed had a spirited debate in their comment section that is worth reading, even if some of the names might look familiar. If you don’t have time to read all of the comments, make sure to check out the ones by Scott Mercer and Pete McFerrin.

LAist was slightly more critical. In a post entitled "Metro’s Plan: It’s Realistic, But Not Visionary," Zach Behrens writes:

As you can see, the public’s support of both a subway down Wilshire and down Santa Monica Blvd. did not even make the unfunded part. It’s as if the decision has already been made to solely run it down Wilshire. Nor does the map indicate even a bus lane or expanded service over the Sepulveda Pass on the 405 freeway. However, it does appear that the Red Line has plans to march north beyond the NoHo Arts District and the Valley will get a few more north-south Orange Line extensions. Of course, this plan is very broad and details and questions can be asked during a series of meetings that begin at the end of his month.

The Times’ blog writers have also been busy writing about the plan. Steve Hymon, who is also the Times’ beat writer for transportation, wrote a quick summary for the Bottleneck Blog and wondered from where the funding for these projects would come. The Bottleneck Blog would later gape at the amount of traffic growth projected for LA County in the plan. Despite Metro’s dual role as highway and transit planner, most of the comments on all blogs have been directed at the transit planning, even on the car-oriented Bottleneck Blog.

But it was the Emerald City blog which looked at the environmental impacts of the plan, which garnered the most attention at the Times’ blog section.  If you don’t have time to check out all of the posts in the comments section, make sure to read the ones by Dan W.

Metro Rider’s prolific Fred Camino has yet to weigh in on the document on the flagship blog for the transit oriented lifestyle, but comments suggest that Metro Rider may be looking to develop its own set of comments on the plan. Discussion at Metro Rider has been broken into two different threads before Metro Rider opened a new forum where most of the comments can now be found.

The Transit Coalition Forums are also actively discussing both the funding of the Long Range Plan and the some of the plan’s proposals. As a matter of fact, they’ve been discussing it for over a month before the plan was officially released.

As we get closer to the public hearings, expect discussion on the plan to increase. In the meantime here are the most common questions and comments that have been raised. Maybe Pam O’Connor can give us some answers tomorrow.

  1. Does Metro have a strategy to raise funds for the Tier 1 and Tier 2 unfunded projects? If so, what is it?
  2. Why is Metro discounting light or heavy rail for West Hollywood along Santa Monica Boulevard?
  3. Why isn’t Metro doing more to plan transit for the valley area, especially in Sylmar where residents are crying out for alleviation from sprawl?
  4. Can Metro better explain how it chooses between rail and light rail along different corridors?
  5. Why isn’t Metro considering a rail line for the 405 where it’s currently planning for a bus-only lane?

Photo: Deniz Durmus/Metro


Metro Committee OKs Dismal Walk/Bike Plan Now, Funding Report Later

More than fifty people showed up at this week’s Metro Planning and Programming Committee to urge the Metro board to support active transportation. Metro’s proposed $88.2 billion, ten-year Short Range Transportation Plan (SRTP) includes only $500 million for active transportation funding. Though walking and bicycling make up nearly 20 percent of L.A. County trips, Metro allocates […]

Showdown Over Bike/Walk Funds Missing from Metro Short Range Plan

Metro’s Short Term Transportation Plan is on the agenda for this Wednesday’s Metro board Planning and Programming Committee. The SRTP is the agency’s $88 billion plan for the next 10 years. Though concerns have been raised about technology, articulated buses, and extending the Gold Line east of Azusa, the main point of contention appears to […]

Metro’s “Short Range Transportation Plan” Meetings Start Today

Starting this evening and continuing during the next two weeks Metro is holding community meetings seeking input on its Draft 2014 Short Range Transportation Plan and the companion technical document. Metro describes the plan thusly: … a ten-year action plan that guides our programs and projects through 2024. It advances us towards the long-term goals […]

Metro Takes to the Airwaves to Tout LRTP

Still have questions about Metro’s Long Range Transportation Plan? Confused about what’s so HOT about congestion pricing? Are you one of those people that feels that Metro’s online chats are nothing more than canned responses to easy questions? Well, then here’s your chance to get better answers. Metro Board Chair Pam O’Connor will take to […]

Metro Extends Reach With Its New First Last Mile Strategic Plan

At its April 2014 meeting, the Metro board approved its First Last Mile Strategic Plan & Planning Guidelines. For readers unfamiliar with “first last mile” terminology, it’s planner-speak for looking at the portion of a transit trip between a transit stop and one’s final destination, most often a home or work place. Generally every transit trip […]

Metro’s $40 Billion Plan

Metro’s Plans Are Big on Expansion, Not So Big on Increasing Bike/Ped. Access to Their Stations Before Metro can place a half cent sales tax increase on the fall ballot, it needs to tell us how it’s going to spend the $40 billion the increase would raise over the next thirty years.  At last week’s […]