Another Packed House at Metro Westside Transit Meeting
I have no idea how that one seat remained empty… More than 100 people packed into the Los Angeles County Museum to hear a presentation on next steps for the Westside Transit Corridor Study a.k.a. The Subway to the Sea. While enthusiasm for the project remains high, Metro isn’t yet ready to determine what route … Continued
10:57 AM PST on February 1, 2008
I have no idea how that one seat remained empty…More than 100 people packed into the Los Angeles County Museum to hear a presentation on next steps for the Westside Transit Corridor Study a.k.a. The Subway to the Sea. While enthusiasm for the project remains high, Metro isn’t yet ready to determine what route to move forward with or where in the world they’re going to get the funding to build anything. While Metro can discuss alternatives, it won’t be until April until routing studies are done and questions can be answered on ridership, cost, savings, etc…
The meeting began with a presentation by Metro staff on the 17 alternatives still being considered for project alignment and type. Most of the alternatives being considered are some sort of transit, (BRT, Subway, Light Rail and Monorail/Mag Lev are all still being considered) and whether the alignment should run down Santa Monica Boulevard or Wilshire Boulevard (or both!). Not surprisingly, since the meeting was being held on Wilshire, most of the audience favored a Wilshire alignment.
Project Manager David Mieger seemed almost apologetic that this study needed to be so large. He explained that to seek state and federal dollars, all modes must be considered, “You can’t just go to Sacramento and say ‘we want a subway.” Despite that, he often referred to the project as the “Subway to the Sea” and opined about the shortcomings of some alignments.
Back in the fall, comments were overwhelmingly supportive of the traditional “Subway to the Sea” alignment and mode (having a subway go down Wilshire to the Third Street Promenade in Santa Monica). 159 of 208 comments supported either a Wilshire Alignment or a Wilshire/Santa Monica alignment and 262 comments supported a subway with only 8 opposing.
And the time to comment didn’t end in the fall. Almost 3 dozen people submitted comment cards and topics ranged from possible new alignments, to the effects of global warming on the subway system (will the tunnels flood?).
And if you missed your chance to testify last night, don’t worry. There’s still plenty of chances to comment before Metro chooses it’s preferred plan for the project.
Streetsblog has migrated to a new comment system. New commenters can register directly in the comments section of any article. Returning commenters: your previous comments and display name have been preserved, but you'll need to reclaim your account by clicking "Forgot your password?" on the sign-in form, entering your email, and following the verification link to set a new password — this is required because passwords could not be carried over during the migration. For questions, contact tips@streetsblog.org.
More from Streetsblog Los Angeles
Wednesday’s Headlines
ICE, low stress bikeways, L.A. City Budget, repaving, speed limits, Culver City, D Line, LAX, Monterey Park, car-nage, and more
April 22, 2026
The Week In Livable Streets
CicLAvia West L.A., Metro board/governance meetings, Pacific Coast Highway, and more.
April 21, 2026
Tuesday’s Headlines
Transit-oriented housing, L.A. city budget, Earth Day, D Line, River bridge, Burbank, LAHSA, Whittier Narrows, and more
April 21, 2026
Metro Still Planning 605 Freeway Widening Mega-Project, Additional $46.9M Slated to be Approved This Week
Metro and Caltrans are planning a $4B+ highway expansion mega-project that would widen 15 miles of the 605 Freeway, plus several adjacent stretches of the 5, 10, 60, and 105 Freeways
April 20, 2026
Monday’s Headlines
Sponsor Streetsblog's commuter race, Metro D Line, transit-housing law, Vermont Avenue, speed cameras, Pasadena, WeHo, museums, car-nage, and more
April 20, 2026
