This Local Return program is part of Metro's countywide Measure M sales tax. Metro collects sales tax revenue and passes that money to municipalities - 88 cities and L.A. County - to spend on transportation. Cities receive funding on a per capita basis.
And they spend it on cars and their drivers.
Graph showing how cities spent Metro Measure M Local Return funds as of Fiscal Year 2022. Dollars represent cumulative totals for all Local Return as of FY22 - via today's Metro presentationGraph showing how cities spend Metro Measure M Local Return funding - via Metro presentation
Well, about 80 percent of it. This is despite cities having flexibility to use Local Return money for hard-to-fund transit operations, transit-oriented housing (for transportation components - see Metro guidelines), or active transportation - biking and walking.
Unfortunately this isn't really news. The last time Metro shared its local return funding breakdown - back in late 2021 - SBLA reported briefly on how car-centric this pot of money was.
Fiscal Year 2021 Metro Measure M cumulative Local Return spending graph - via Metro presentationRecent Metro Measure M funding
Local Return has actually gotten slightly worse since 2021. Cumulative totals show Car centric categories (Streets and Roads, Traffic Control which is basically traffic signals) have increased (from 81 to 82 percent), while green transportation categories (Active Transportation, Public Transit, etc.) shrank (from 15 to 11 percent) [see SBLA spreadsheet]. Transportation Administration's percentage has grown.
Is it Metro's fault? Not especially. Metro collects this "pass-through" money then sends it to cities with few strings attached. There are similar pass-throughs for other county sales taxes: Measure R, Proposition C, and Proposition A.
Metro could and should adjust its guidelines to make greener and more equity-focused category requirements less restrictive. (And, perhaps Metro could incentivize car-centric projects to include complete streets components, and not harm equity - say, like in accordance with Metro's adopted Complete Streets and Equity policies? Unfortunately that looks like a heavy lift, as various cities would likely resist Metro telling them not to just funnel their money into car projects.)
Vermont/Santa Monica Station transit-oriented development construction last month. Photo by Joe Linton/StreetsblogVermont/Santa Monica transit-oriented development construction last month. Photo by Joe Linton/Streetsblog
Perhaps Mayor Karen Bass could shepherd more of L.A. City's considerable Measure M funding (a rough estimate looks like $180+ million$60-70 million annually) toward TOC housing?
(Dollar figures corrected 3/2/2022. Streetsblog initially incorrectly took Metro's reported Local Return dollar totals as annual amounts, but the Metro figures are overall cumulative totals. Thanks to @numble for pointing this out in the comments.)
The Puente Creek Bikeway will provide a safe alternative to busy Amar Road between the area’s main north-south arterials, Hacienda Boulevard and Azusa Avenue.
Santa Monica's recently completed 17th Street bikeway improvements have a "region leading design" featuring Southern California's first protected "Dutch-style" intersections, plus concrete curb protection, and makes great connections to the city's growing bikeway network