Mayor Garcetti Supports Dodgers Gondola, Disses Project Skeptics Comparing Them To Mitch McConnell

Dodgers Stadium gondola rendering - from L.A. Art website
Dodgers Stadium gondola rendering - from L.A. Art website

Yesterday, the Metro board Executive Management Committee received an update on the proposed aerial gondola project between Dodgers Stadium and Union Station. There were no votes taken, but the committee debate showed clear sides being drawn for and against the controversial project.

Proposed route of Dodgers Stadium gondola. Map via L.A. ART website

The gondola project is formally called Los Angeles Aerial Rapid Transit or L.A. ART.  From early on, developer and former Dodgers owner Frank McCourt pledged to pay for at least part of the project privately. Metro’s staff report notes that L.A. ART “is completely funded by the Aerial Rapid Transit Technologies (ARTT), including reimbursement of Metro staff time.” ARTT is spin-off corporation formed by McCourt’s family for the gondola project.

Though it is not a Metro project, the agency would need to approve the project’s environmental documents (an Environmental Impact Report – EIR). The draft EIR is expected to be released this fall, likely before Thanksgiving. (Metro is also expected to allow L.A. ART station/s on property it owns – especially at Union Station.)

At committee, both public comment and boardmembers were divided on the project.

The area where the gondola would be located is L.A. City Council District 1, which, starting in December, will be represented by Councilmember-elect Eunisses Hernandez. Speaking to the committee, Hernandez expressed her concerns about the project, calling for transparency, accountability, community engagement, and a full clear long-term commitment that taxpayers would not subsidize the project.

I have some concerns about the Frank McCourt project, the L.A. ART project and L.A. Metro draft proposal that looks like it will cost about 300 million dollars.

There hasn’t been enough community input and I’m glad that you all are talking about having forums. I hope that it’s more than two. I hope that it’s also out of the holidays because a lot of the folks who have been here have been motivated though word by community outreach. That doesn’t happen a lot through the holidays. […]

I would also like assurance from the Metro that this project will not use any taxpayer dollars in the future. The recent gift of this project to a nonprofit does give me pause that tax dollars will be utilized for a project that is mostly a tourist attraction. Every public dollar should be used for projects that decrease traffic and make it easier for working class people to travel around our vast city […] To that end I would like to see plans that address potential cost overruns and a project budget. I would like to ensure that there’s a robust fiscal management to ensure that taxpayer dollars are used wisely and judiciously.

Hernandez’ ears were probably burning, as just before she gave testimony, Metro Boardmembers Hilda Solis and Eric Garcetti had a back and forth exchange over how much attention Metro should pay to the incoming councilmember.

Solis expressed concern over various aspects of L.A. ART – from gentrification and displacement, to impacts on mom-and-pop businesses and parking. Solis called for “providing more public hearings” and waiting until December when Hernandez takes office. “I don’t believe that it’s fair,” Solis stated “to just allow for a project to move forward that’s going to impact her district so dramatically without having her have a full purview of what is going on and hearing from all sides and understanding the project herself.”

Garcetti, who is termed out the day Hernandez takes office, opened his response describing himself as a “pretty unabashed supporter” of L.A. ART. He stated that the project was about “reducing traffic… getting people off the roads.”

Then he had some choice words directed at Hernandez:

All of us cycle in and out. I know you’re talking about the councilmember. I’ll also be gone, so one can say “wait for the new mayor, wait for the new councilmember.” You’ll all have those moments as Supervisors, as whatever. We’ve heard those arguments in Washington sometimes: don’t do a Supreme Court Justice now because a new president’s coming, etc.” 

The logic is somewhat tortured, but Garcetti seems to be accusing Hilda Solis of behaving like Senator Mitch McConnell when he blocked President Obama’s nomination of Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court. The lame duck mayor is trying to exert his waning power in favor of Frank McCourt’s gondola project – and trying to stifle the influence of unabashedly progressive Hernandez.

A Metro board vote on the project won’t take place until 2023 at the soonest. And the Metro board will look pretty different after December. Garcetti and his three appointees will almost certainly depart, as the incoming mayor appoints their own boardmembers.


Coming Soon: Buses to Chavez Ravine?

Some baseball teams have full transit plans…the Dodgers don’t even have buses Councilmembers Ed Reyes and Eric Garcetti have been earning high marks from cyclists recently, and soon they might be earning high marks from baseball fans as well. The councilmembers are backing a motion that will be heard at tomorrow’s Transportation Committee Hearing which […]

Coming Soon:Take the Bus to the Game?

Don't Worry, There's Nothing to Dodge These Days Councilmember Ed Reyes and Council President Ed Reyes have stood out recently as advocates for cyclists in recent weeks. If their resolution urging Metro and the Dodgers to work together to (re)create bus access to Dodger Stadium is succesful they may also gain praise from baseball fans. The resolution will be heard by the City Council Transportation Committe at tomorrow's (Tuesday, 2/27) meeting. That we're discussing adding bus service to baseball games is confusing to this east coaster. How can a baseball team that was partially named after a mode of transit (the Brooklyn Trolley Dodgers) doesn't have any non-automobile options to get to the stadium? That no transit service of any kind exists for Major League baseball in Los Angeles is just one of many signs of how car culture has taken control of the transportation grid. In other major cities transit is a crucial part of local nine's transportation plan and in some cases transit is spotlighted by the team as the best way to get to the ballpark. Yet in L.A., one of our teams has no transit access at all and the next closest team, the geographically challenged Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim, doesn't list transit as an option to travel to the ball park on the official website.