Metro’s $400 Million Roads Plan Is an Act of Climate Change Denial

The City of Duarte is expected to see 40 more extreme heat days by 2050. (Credit: LA Times)
The City of Duarte is expected to see 40 more extreme heat days by 2050. (Credit: LA Times)

After decades on the books, community voices — supported by NRDC and countless others — prevailed and the 710 North “gap closure” project is dead. Good riddance. But the plan on how to spend the $400 million in leftover money is an affront to the health of San Gabriel Valley residents and our climate future.

By 2050, UCLA climate scientists expect the San Gabriel Valley to see the number of extreme heat days with 95-plus degree temperatures climb from 32 today, to 74 by 2050, and 117 by 2100. Imagine: four months of every year with 95+ temp days. That’s a future kids born this year will live through unless we take immediate steps to halt climate change.

But we don’t need to wait until mid-century to know climate change is impacting communities across Los Angeles. Climate change is making our local wildfires hotter and more destructive, according to UCLA researchers.

With so much at stake — lives shortened, habitat lost, communities irrevocably harmed — community leaders in a position to mitigate the worst effects of climate change must act. It’s a moral duty they must not shirk.

This Thursday, the 13 elected and appointed officials who make up the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority board of directors have a once-in-a-generation opportunity to invest $400 million in the San Gabriel Valley that could help reduce the leading source of carbon emissions in California — the tailpipes of passenger vehicles and trucks.

Two weeks ago, 13 federal agencies including the EPA and NASA told us we have vanishingly little time to act on climate change.

Last week, our California climate regulator, the Air Resources Board (ARB), excoriated cities and regions for failing to meet their greenhouse gas reduction goals due to spending funding on roads rather than sustainable transportation.

This week, will Metro take this opportunity to invest in $400 million worth of electric buses, walkable sidewalks, bike connections and mobility improvements for families, seniors, and workers?

Sadly, exactly the opposite. The Metro Directors are on a glide path to pouring more gasoline on our local climate change fire with $400 million in projects to entice more driving and undermine transit ridership on Metro’s own buses and trains.

When Metro and Caltrans finally agreed not to move forward with the deeply misguided 710 North project, Metro should have made the obvious pivot to a climate-smart transportation approach that improves mobility options and reduces pollution.

Instead, Metro is set to approve a $400 million grab-bag of road widenings — including a six-lane surface highway on Atlantic Avenue — that amount to a freeway death by a thousand cuts for the communities of Alhambra, Pasadena, San Gabriel, Monterrey Park, Montebello, and more.

The road package was developed behind closed doors with limited public input from the communities previously in the path of the 710 North project. Despite SGV cities asking for money for bus-rapid transit corridors, Gold Line connections, and zero emission buses, Metro is considering a cherry-picked list of road projects that will encourage more driving and fill our communities with congestion and air pollution.

It’s time for Metro to pump the brakes on this misguided, climate-harming road plan.

It’s time for Metro to follow through on its own adopted complete streets and equity policies.

It’s time for our elected leaders to match their lofty climate words with real action that makes a difference.

It’s time for Metro Directors to send this back to the drawing board, generate a true public process centered in the values of community health, equity and sustainability, and produce a list of projects that reduce vehicle emissions, improve mobility for those who need it most, and ensure the residents of the San Gabriel Valley can finally breathe clean air.

Natural Resources Defense Council’s Carter Rubin advocates for creating transportation options that reduce carbon emissions and support equitable access for all. Rubin previously served for five years in the Los Angeles mayor’s office working on transportation policy and performance management. He earned his master’s in urban and regional planning at the University of California, Los Angeles, where he focused his studies on transportation, land use, and parking. Rubin serves as a board member of California Streets Initiative, the umbrella non-profit that runs Streetsblog’s L.A., S.F. and California websites.


  • Dubonnet

    What about extending the rail system? I’m telling you, if you built 500 billion trillion bajillion miles of road it would only attract more cars.

  • Blues of Morderer

    We are headed for a global cooling phase (no warming these past 20 years, last 2 years are the coldest on record, drop in 0.6 deg C, which erases everything this past century). We need to heat the planet in order to fight global cooling and save humanity.

  • Herbie Huff

    Awesome piece, Carter. Couldn’t agree more.

  • Ben Phelps

    I’m angry

  • jsin michael

    Denying the 710 extension was for the best, but you’re lying to yourself if you think that people will stop commuting through these communities. Until we have a futuristic resolve, we owe it to those communities to have the best infrastructure for safe and efficient travel. Hopefully the money will be maximized and put to good use.

  • Johnny Blades

    This is so dumb and so lame

    You’re living through the five hottest years on Earth since the dawn of civilization

    die bot die

  • Numan Parada

    Some points to make:

    “After decades on the books, community voices […] prevailed…”

    My community voice (and that of numerous others) did not prevail, as a resident of Southern California, a regional transportation user and a former commuter through the area in question. Only the voices with the power to make choices did.

    “The 710 North ‘gap closure’ project is dead.”

    As long as the need, the vision and the tools to make it happen are around, the tunnel will not be “dead” until it is ultimately built, even with the above improvements.

    “Metro is considering a cherry-picked list of road projects that will encourage more driving and fill our communities with congestion and air pollution.”

    Well, considering we will have no tunnel to actually help us, I certainly don’t mind road projects that at least make the trip through these communities at leas somewhat more bearable.

    “It’s time for Metro Directors to send this back to the drawing board, generate a true public process….”

    This I agree with. We will need a new round of public meetings so that the communities affected can bring in more ideas to deal with this situation, including the ones you mentioned in the article as well as others we all nay have missed.

  • Ben Phelps

    these are not good points

  • OnlineNetizen

    do realize that Metro is the planning agency for the county when it comes to roads and bridges as well. you can’t just ignore all the people who live 40 miles from downtown. if you really want people to take the train, then build dense urban cores. if not, you need to widen roads. without dense urban cores, public transit isn’t sustainable

  • Frank Kotter

    Or: if you really want to build urban cores, widening roads funded by tax revenue will make this impossible.

  • OnlineNetizen

    i think the better solution would be to separate the transit agency from the road planning one. the urban core issue would need change at city halls in built out areas. In the meantime, you still have to deal with the traffic due to poor planning

  • Frank Kotter

    In most states/metros it is. It means interstates are flooded with cash (literally fully funded ahead of time before the locals even have a say) and ‘transit’ is starved. Using ‘traffic’ as a justification to keep funding road building is exactly how we got here. We need to change.

  • Campbell Sadeghy

    The tunnel needs to be built and thanks to a small group of selfish, self centered people, millions of people a year who would have used it will now clog your surface streets or continue to sit in traffic on other corridors.

    Many other countries and cities are now seeing how great tunnels are. Unfortunately in this county, we just seem to post pretty renderings of new homes, bike lanes, and parks. But the reality never changes.

    Most people still drive. Most people still don’t bike. Traffic congestion is still at record levels leading to misery for those just wanting to get to work.

    No matter how many more pretty renderings you post of projects like this, these small projects don’t do a single a thing to help any of that.

    Hopefully the sane decision will be made and this stub will kept for a tunnel that needs to be brought back.

    As for climate change, what a joke! Freeways do absolutely nothing to affect climate change. I think your beef should be with the engines that power cars. And no, electric cars are NOT the solution in their current form. They are just as bad as combustion engines.

  • Campbell Sadeghy

    Great points and very reasonable response.

    Cities all over the world are building freeway tunnels as they are a great compromise providing something for everyone. It gives car commuters more options and lessens congestion on freeways giving motorist more lanes and it avoids disconnecting communities.

    Without the tunnel, all that will result is traffic continuing to move as fast as possible through local thoroughfares.

    My ideal vision would be a nice 8-10 lane tunnel with two tolled lanes in each direction, redesigned surface streets, a capped Pasadena 710, and a streetcar running from Pasadena to South Pasadena and to Alhambra. Add protected bike lanes on Atlantic and Huntington.

    Perhaps consider ROW for heavy freight rail tunnel that would run from LB and tunnel under the Los Angeles forest into the high desert.

    We need to start thinking bold again and make investments that we will look back on like the interstate system and he so glad we did.

  • Campbell Sadeghy

    How about doing what’s right and expand both the rail system and the freeways so people can choose for themselves what they want to and not be forced to use something or face horrid traffic congestion?

  • Campbell Sadeghy

    Many people are. Get in line lol

  • Johnny Blades

    no they’re not

    time to go back to school, country boy

  • Campbell Sadeghy

    New Zealand, Netherlands, Japan, Norway, Spain, Australia. . . I can go and on, all have major multi-billion dollar urban freeway tunnel projects either underway, U/C, or recently completed.

  • Johnny Blades

    Knock yourself out, as long as you’re not “going on” with your silly GOP BS about EVs

  • Campbell Sadeghy

    What? I’m a registered Democrat my dude.

    I’m not sure what you are on about with EV’s and I love Tesla’s, but if you think they are environmentally friendly perhaps you should look at how the batteries that power them are made and the mines they come from.

    We won’t even get into the truth behind wind and solar energy less you wish to educate yourself and do your own research on the matter.

    I am not sure what else you could be assuming I was referring to, but I am not opposed to EV’s, as I clearly said. I am opposed to EV tech in its current form.

  • Johnny Blades

    yes dingus, all cars are made from mined materials- and yet some don’t need continuous mining forever, just to fuel em! WOW

    keep on with your verbose wanking in comments sections, your defenses of conservatism on curbed are precious as well

  • Campbell Sadeghy

    96 percent of your comments are just personal insults and assumptions. Go argue with someone else, because isn’t going to be me, chief! :)



Urbanism in the Age of Climate Change

Editor’s note: Today we are very pleased to begin a five-part series of excerpts from Peter Calthorpe’s book, “Urbanism in the Age of Climate Change.” Keep reading this week and next to learn how you can win a copy of the book from Island Press. I take as a given that climate change is an […]

No 710 Coalition: No on Measure J

(This is the third of four op/eds on Measure J that Streetsblog will publish this week. Monday, Gloria Ohland of Move L.A. made the case for Measure J and Wednesday Streetsblog Board Member Joel Epstein did the same. In between, the BRU made their case for a no vote. – DN) Only in the car capital of the world could […]