Wrongheaded Koretz Sidewalk Repair Amendment Slights Pedestrians and Vision Zero

LA's sidewalk repair program now prioritzes where people actually walk
LA's sidewalk repair program now prioritzes where people actually walk

At yesterday’s L.A. City Council Budget and Finance Committee, councilmember Paul Koretz proposed removing prioritization criteria that links sidewalk repair to Vision Zero.

SBLA readers may be aware that, resulting from the Willits lawsuit settlement, the city of L.A. has embarked on a 30-year program to repair ailing sidewalks.

Proposed sidewalk repair prioritization criteria, including Vision Zero High Injury Network - chart from staff report
Proposed sidewalk repair prioritization criteria, including Vision Zero High Injury Network – chart from staff report

The budget committee was discussing the Bureau of Engineering’s scoring system (staff report) for prioritizing sidewalk repair projects. The proposed city would have given 15 points out of a possible 145 for sidewalk repairs within 500 feet of the Vision Zero High Injury Network intersections or corridors. The HIN is the six percent of L.A. streets where 65 percent of all deaths and severe injuries take place.

In discussing the criteria (audio – item 12) Koretz asserted that proximity to the High Injury Network was “irrelevant.” While the HIN is not a perfect measure of pedestrian need or equity, it does represent places where people are actually walking – and getting injured and killed – in higher numbers than other parts of the city.

Investing in Place, which submitted a well-reasoned comment letter on the item (council file 14-0163-S3), argues that the sidewalk repair program is not sufficiently tied into the city’s transportation priorities. Sidewalk project planning and implementation take place in the Public Works Department, not the Department of Transportation. Sidewalk repair does not take into account special pedestrian zones, such as pedestrian areas designated in Mobility Plan 2035.

Responding to Koretz’ move to further untie sidewalk work from walking, Investing in Place Deputy Director Naomi Iwasaki told SBLA:

It is concerning that Los Angeles sidewalks and the people that rely on them are consistently separated from overall transportation planning and funding conversations. Removing the Vision Zero High Injury Network from the city’s proposed sidewalk repair program prioritization criteria is another indication that our city sees sidewalks as separate from traffic safety and not a part of our efforts to improve the Los Angeles transportation system.

At yesterday’s meeting, councilmembers Koretz, Paul Krekorian, and Bob Blumenfield all voted to approve the anti-Vision Zero amendment. The revised criteria will need to be approved by the full city council before taking effect.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

An Underwhelming Sidewalk Repair Day at L.A. City Hall

|
A little less conversation, a little more action please All this aggravation ain’t satisfactioning me A little more bite and a little less bark – song performed by Elvis Presley (words by Billy Strange, Mac Davis) Elvis did not necessarily have Los Angeles sidewalks in mind when he asked for less conversation and more action, […]

March Transpo Committee Recap: SRTS, Counts, Parking and Commish Bayne

|
Yesterday’s Los Angeles City Council Transportation Committee meeting featured a number of livability issues that deserve more in-depth attention: Safe Routes to School, bicycle and pedestrian traffic counts, parking privatization, and more. SBLA will do a brief re-cap, and will track and report on these issues more in the future. The Top 50 List You […]