Skip to content
Sponsored

It’s Not Just Trump: House GOP Members Ramp Up Road-Building Campaign

Watch out: The leader of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee is making a push for an infrastructure spending spree, even though the current federal transportation funding law doesn't expire for several years. Advocates will have to guard against a new road-building binge.
2:30 PM PST on February 10, 2017
It’s Not Just Trump: House GOP Members Ramp Up Road-Building Campaign
Bill Shuster, head of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. Photo: House T&I Committee

Taking a cue from Donald Trump, the leader of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee is making a push for an infrastructure spending spree, even though the current federal transportation funding law doesn’t expire for several years.

Last week committee chair Bill Shuster, a Pennsylvania Republican, kicked off a campaign called “Building a 21st Century Infrastructure” with a hearing featuring testimony from freight shippers, carmakers, equipment manufacturers, and other interests that reap rewards from more road spending.

The campaign is still in the hype phase. We know that the highway building industry is excited, but no specific policy proposal has been announced. So far what Shuster’s committee has released is a list of vague “principles”:

  • Make smart investments, consistent with the fundamental federal role, to ensure a modern, efficient U.S. transportation infrastructure.
  • Leverage resources from all levels of government and the private sector.
  • Recognize, promote, and develop integrated transportation systems.
  • Empower state and local governments.
  • Encourage technological solutions and promote innovation.
  • Reduce regulatory burdens on U.S. businesses.
  • Streamline and cut federal government red tape to expedite transportation projects.

These principles are laced with code phrases. In conservative orthodoxy, for instance, “the fundamental federal role” does not include spending on transit. Meanwhile, “empowering state and local governments” implies weakening federal oversight of highway-centric state DOTs — which could erode progress U.S. DOT made during the Obama administration.

The document does contain one explicit reference to “inadequate” “public transit and rail transportation,” but otherwise the language is standard boilerplate that refers to accelerated highway construction. With Senate Democrats talking about making common cause with the White House on infrastructure spending, advocates will have to guard against a new road-building binge.

More recommended reading today: Urban Milwaukee teases out trends in rural economies that might have helped elect Trump in Wisconsin. And the Political Environment reports that Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, facing fiscal pressures, has scaled back an unpopular highway widening in Milwaukee.

Photo of Angie Schmitt
Angie is a Cleveland-based writer with a background in planning and newspaper reporting. She has been writing about cities for Streetsblog for six years.

Read More:

Streetsblog has migrated to a new comment system. New commenters can register directly in the comments section of any article. Returning commenters: your previous comments and display name have been preserved, but you'll need to reclaim your account by clicking "Forgot your password?" on the sign-in form, entering your email, and following the verification link to set a new password — this is required because passwords could not be carried over during the migration. For questions, contact tips@streetsblog.org.

More from Streetsblog Los Angeles

Friday Bike Updates: New 2nd Street Bike Lane, and Two Upcoming CicLAvias

April 24, 2026

The Week in Short Video: Sponsor Streetsblog L.A.’s Great Commuter Race!

April 24, 2026

Opposition Melts Away as Durazo Announces Major Changes to SB 1361

April 24, 2026

Friday’s Headlines

April 24, 2026

Eyes on the Street: South El Monte’s Safe Routes to School Improvements

April 23, 2026
See all posts