The Neighborhood Integrity Initiative, in the name of fighting mega-projects, would heavily restrict a broad range of market rate and affordable housing projects. NII is now expected to go before L.A. County voters in March 2017.
Today's coalition speakers included Los Angeles City Councilmember Gil Cedillo, and representatives from the Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce, homeless services provider Jovenes Inc, the United Way, the Lake Balboa Neighborhood Council, Climate Resolve, and others. Speakers criticized NII as a way to continue southern California's outdated model of sprawling suburban development.
Coalition speakers anticipate that NII will exacerbate Los Angeles' housing crunch—driving up rents and increasing gentrification and homelessness. Various speakers elaborated L.A.'s huge need for new housing at every level, from homeless to affordable to middle class to market rate.
The Lincoln Heights parking lot where the press event took place is one of a dozen city-owned sites currently in the early stages of development for affordable and transitional housing under the Affordable Housing Opportunity Sites initiative. Twelve city-owned sites in Lincoln Heights, Sylmar, San Pedro, and South and West L.A. are slated for affordable housing, with an emphasis on transitional housing to serve the homeless. Speakers criticized a supposed exception in NII for projects that provide 100 percent affordable housing. Jerry Jones of the Inner City Law Center called the NII exemption "a sick joke" and a misleading sham, as it would prohibit affordable housing projects that require a city General Plan Amendment (GPA.) Jones and others emphasized that the Lincoln Heights site, and indeed eleven of the city's twelve Affordable Housing Opportunity Sites, would be impossible to develop under NII, as they require a GPA. The United Way's Chris Ko emphasized that if NII passes, "this parking lot remains a parking lot."
Jones further stressed that the NII's stated two-year ban on non-by-right development is effectively likely to be more of ten-plus-year ban because no GPAs are allowed until community plans are updated. L.A.'s community plan updates easily take seven or more years to formulate and approve. This long delay is in part due to anti-development lawsuits brought by NII supporters.
Councilmember Cedillo concluded the press event emphasizing that working families need places to live in L.A., and that the NII would lead to greater sprawl and longer car commutes that are bad for the environment and the climate.