Metro Moving Forward With Flawed Complete Streets Policy

Cover of proposed Metro Complete Streets Policy, approved by Metro's Sustainability Committee today. Image via Metro, full report here.
Cover of proposed Metro Complete Streets Policy, approved by Metro’s Sustainability Committee today. Image via Metro, full report [PDF]
At today’s meeting, the Metro board of directors Ad Hoc Sustainability Committee approved the agency’s proposed Complete Streets Policy [PDF]. The committee approval sends the policy to the full board for anticipated approval at its meeting next Thursday, October 23.

Complete streets policies, broadly, mandate that all streets need to accommodate people using all modes of travel, including walking, bicycling, transit, and driving.

Metro staff in giving their presentation [PDF], expressed that the bulk of regional complete streets implementation occurs outside Metro’s jurisdiction. For the most part, street configurations are the jurisdiction of individual cities.

Metro staff identified two key areas where they assert that Metro has its greatest influence over complete streets implementation:

  • Corridor Planning: Metro is a lead agency in building various projects, most prominently rail, but also highways and other facilities.
  • Transportation Funding: Metro passes funding along to cities (and others) to build projects – including via the Call for Projects.

Seven public speakers, including L.A. County Bicycle Coalition’s Eric Bruins and Safe Routes To School National Partnership’s Jessica Meaney, expressed support for complete streets goals, and criticism of the draft policy. Comments focused on lack of enforceability, equity, performance metrics, as well as overall vagueness. For more details on criticisms expressed, read the Los Angeles County Active Transportation Collaborative comment letter at SRTS.

Sustainability committee members including Duarte City Councilmember John Fasana and L.A. City Councilmember Mike Bonin’s Transportation Deputy Paul Backstrom portrayed the new policy as “a step in the right direction,” while suggesting that some improvements will need to be made to it over time. The committee approved the policy, and requested that staff return later with proposed metrics.

In recent years, Metro has incorporated commendable complete streets facilities as part of some of its projects; examples include multi-use bike/walk paths along portions of the Metro Orange and Expo Lines. Though these bike and walk facilities are well-used, Metro does not include them in all projects, and tends to invest much greater funding in providing free parking for cars than it does in ensuring safe and convenient walking and bicycling access to its stations.

Metro recently adopted its First Last Mile Strategic Plan. Many Metro projects, though, continue to be rail- and car-focused, with first/last mile bike and pedestrian facilities being poorly-funded afterthoughts unevenly tacked on much later.

What’s in Metro’s proposed Complete Streets policy? 

  • The policy sketches out a commendable vision: “Complete Streets that provide safe, comfortable, and convenient travel along and across streets (including streets, roads, transit facilities, highways, bridges, and other portions of the transportation system) through a comprehensive, integrated transportation network that serves all categories of users, including pedestrians, users and operators of public transit, bicyclists, persons with disabilities, seniors, children, motorists, users of green modes, and movers of commercial goods.”
  • The vision is undermined by plenty of non-binding non-committal language. Examples include: “Metro is committed to considering all users…” and  “These facilities should address the need for pedestrians and bicycles to cross…” (emphasis added).
  • The policy outlines lots of vague exceptions. If policy compliance costs a lot, or has “environmental or social impacts,” then it is acceptable to go with the past incomplete street approach.
  • The exemption process is unclear. Contrast this with, say, a parking policy adopted by a city. When a proposed project fails to meet mandated parking requirements, the project is then subjected to an approval process for an exemption. In the absence of a clearly-defined exemption process, it appears doubtful that Metro will rigorously evaluate projects for complete streets policy compliance.
  • The policy includes a Complete Streets Implementation Plan (pages 20-23) which lists a series of tasks that Metro will need to work with partners to complete. The list, unfortunately, does not identify what agency partners Metro will work with, nor even which Metro department is responsible for specified follow-through.

The Metro Complete Streets Policy could be critical (or might just be Completely ignored, pun intended) as current discussions shape a possible future sales tax proposal, and Metro’s upcoming capital programs and Call for Projects. The Metro Complete Streets Policy policy will be considered by the full board next week.

  • BJToepper

    The bike provisions along the Expo line, at least from Jefferson towards parts east, are as perfunctory as can be. Metro can do better.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Metro Not Quite Ready for First/Last Mile Funding for Purple Line Phase 2

|
Just when the Metro board was on the verge of adopting a policy to incorporate first/last mile, including bike and walk, connections into “the planning, design, and construction of all [Metro] transit projects,” Metro staff postponed including first/last mile connections to the second phase of Purple Line subway expansion. The issue before the board was Metro’s […]

Showdown Over Bike/Walk Funds Missing from Metro Short Range Plan

|
Metro’s Short Term Transportation Plan is on the agenda for this Wednesday’s Metro board Planning and Programming Committee. The SRTP is the agency’s $88 billion plan for the next 10 years. Though concerns have been raised about technology, articulated buses, and extending the Gold Line east of Azusa, the main point of contention appears to […]

Metro Board July Updates: Joint Development, Bike-Share, and More

|
Today’s monthly Metro Board of Directors meeting saw the chair transition from L.A. Mayor Eric Garcetti to L.A. County Supervisor Mark Ridley-Thomas. Incoming Chair Ridley-Thomas expounded on his priorities for the current fiscal year. The July board meeting did not feature any major controversies, but there are a number of items likely to be of interest […]
Metro's planning committee approved narrowing down Torrance Green Line alternatives to be studied further. Map via Metro

September Metro Committee Updates: Bike-Share, Bike Parking, Green Line, Open Streets, and Line Naming

|
This month’s Metro board committee meetings discussed and decided several items of interest to Streetsblog readers. Below are updates on several committee items discussed and decided last week. All of these committee approvals are pending board approval at the full board meeting this Thursday. Torrance Green Line Extension Alternatives Narrowed Metro is planning to extend its […]