Skip to Content
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Log In
Bicycling

Times: City Blew it on Wolfpack Hustle Marathon Crash Race

In a land where he once stood with pride / But he'll find his way by the morning light / How will the Wolfpack survive?  2012 Wolfpack Hustle L.A. Marathon Crash Race. photo: Waltarrrrr
In a land where he once stood with pride / But he'll find his way by the morning light / How will the Wolfpack survive? 2012 Wolfpack Hustle L.A. Marathon Crash Race. photo: flickr Waltarrrrr
How will the Wolfpack survive? 2012 Wolfpack Hustle L.A. Marathon Crash Race. photo: Waltarrrrr

The Los Angeles Times weighed in on the fire fight over the Wolfpack Hustle Marathon Crash Race cancellation. While the Times pretty much treats the city's version of events as fact, it still finds the city at fault for forcing the cancellation of a fun, low-cost event that attracted thousands of Angelenos to a safe and healthy event. For a brief history of the Hustle, visit this story on Santa Monica Next.

From the editorial:

But why was Ward notified less than a week before that he would be violating city codes? A spokesman for the Department of Public Works — which includes the Bureau of Street Services — said his agency was only informed Monday about the safety issues. The agencies raising them, he said, included the Los Angeles Police Department and the Department of Transportation. And it takes about 45 days to get a permit for a special event like this.

It's a shame that city officials didn't sit down and talk with Ward about this, oh, at least 45 days ago. Everyone has known for months that the race was coming up, and no doubt an arrangement could have been reached that would have allowed it to go forward under safe conditions and under reasonable city supervision.

I have a few quibbles with the editorial: Why focus on the race's popularity with people out-of-town instead of the thousands of Angelenos that take part? Why not point out that neither Wolfpack Hustle or Ward barely break even on the race considering the amount of time and resources they put into it? Overall, though, the focus is correct.

There was little reason for the city to do this other than it can.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog Los Angeles

Bike Project Round-Up: Culver City Better Overland, WeHo Green, and More

WeHo green bike lane color doesn't quite "pop," and protected bikeways coming soon to Santa Monica, Glendale, and Culver City, and more

February 3, 2026

Tuesday’s Headlines

ICE, LASD, Metrolink, Joanne Nuckols, bungee cords, Pasadena, Glendale, Terminal Island Freeway, car-nage, and more

February 3, 2026

This Week In Livable Streets

Metro L.A. River path deadline, Transit Equity Day celebrates Rosa Parks, Whittier Narrows ride, Metro Public Safety, and more.

February 2, 2026

Eyes on the Street: WeHo Paints All of its Bike Lanes Green

West Hollywood is installing modest safety improvements on Fairfax Avenue, San Vicente Boulevard, and Santa Monica Boulevard

February 2, 2026

Monday’s Headlines

ICE, Culver City, Waymo, Foothill A Line, World Cup, Transit Equity Day, Norwalk, car-nage, and more

February 2, 2026

Comment on Metro L.A. River Path Project by Monday, February 2

SBLA Editor recommends trimming scope towards a fiscally feasible 8-mile project, not Metro's $1B proposed design

January 30, 2026
See all posts