Skip to Content
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Log In

APHA Tallies ‘Hidden Health Costs’ of Transportation Status Quo

9:20 AM PDT on May 20, 2010

The nation's transportation planning process fails to account for more
than $200 billion per year in "hidden health costs" imposed by traffic and air
pollution, according to a new report from the American Public Health
Association (APHA) that maps the nexus between infrastructure and
health care.

08congestion_600.jpgTraffic brings with it billions of dollars in "hidden health costs," according to the APTA. (Photo: NYT)

The APHA's report (available for download here) echoes many of the policy recommendations issued by the
Centers for Disease Control last month: stronger incentives to expand
bicycle and pedestrian networks, as well as more frequent measurement
of the health impacts of new transport projects.

But the APHA, a trade association representing public health
workers, went further than the government by adding up the estimated
costs imposed by the absence of any mandatory evaluation of the health
consequences of transportation decisions.

Citing U.S. DOT
and American Automobile Association studies, respectively, the APHA
pegged the annual price of congested roads at between $50 billion and
$80 billion, with the health toll of traffic crashes -- including the
treatment of fatalities, the resulting court costs, and lost wages --
reaching $180 billion per year.

The majority of those bills
are paid indirectly by the transportation system users they affect, not
factored in advance into local planning, as the APHA writes:

Thefederal government does not require a consistent methodology forenvironmental impact analysis, transportation modeling, or cost-benefitanalysis for agencies seeking federal highway funding — and while thisapproach allows agencies to tailor analyses to fit their needs, itmakesit impossible to compare potential project effectiveness at a nationallevel. It also  means that health impacts, costs and benefits are oftenleft off the table when projects are being considered.

can be done to build those health risks into the calculus that
determines where roads get built, bridges fixed, and crosswalks
painted? The APHA offers San Francisco, where health officials used
economic modeling to weigh the likely pedestrian injury rates caused by
five alternative development plans, as an example of effective local
analysis of transportation's effect on public health.

But the
APHA report underscores the difficulty of achieving a broader shift
without Congress requiring a stronger emphasis on transport policies
that tangibly improve Americans' health. In addition to endorsing the
concept of national transportation objectives -- which has won some Democratic support but sparked resistance
from state DOTs -- the group's new report urges that those new federal
standards "allocate more funds to projects and efforts that support
healthy communities and active transportation."

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog Los Angeles

Guest Opinion: Ten Years In, CA Active Transportation Program Lays Bare a Tale of Two Agencies

L.A. County needs to embrace physically-protected bikeways, robust traffic calming around schools, and similarly transformative, safety-focused projects

September 29, 2023

Eyes on the Station: Metro Fortified Turnstiles at MacArthur Park Station

Metro fortified turnstile entrances at MacArthur Park in order to curb fare-evading riders; sometimes this has adverse impacts on fare-paying riders

September 27, 2023
See all posts