Skip to Content
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Log In
Federal Transportation Bill

The Wall Street Transportation Tax: Predictably Unpopular On Wall Street

As Congress mulls over solutions to the nation's transportation funding gap, with an eye to passing new infrastructure legislation to reverse the rising unemployment rate, Rep. Pete DeFazio's (D-OR) proposed tax on oil futures is picking up new fans in high places.

Peter_DeFazio_2.jpgRep. Pete DeFazio (D-OR) (Photo: UPI)

DeFazio's
legislation would levy a 0.2 percent fee on oil futures and a 0.5
percent fee on oil futures options, and a broader version introduced
earlier this year would impose a 0.25 percent tax on all stock trades
-- a compelling option for a White House wary of voter frustration with
the financial bailout and in need of new revenue-raising ideas.

But
DeFazio's broader transaction-tax bill has attracted a flurry of
dissent from the investment industry. As the chief lobbyist for the
Financial Services Roundtable told the Financial Times in August:

We vigorously oppose a tax on the industry. The financial services industryis a leading sector around the world in producing jobs and providingpeople with goods and services they demand. A punitive tax wouldunnecessarily restrict the industry, harm shareholders, and ultimatelyweaken a key segment in the world economy.

The pension industry is reportedly just as cool on the proposal, and an online petition filed against the broader DeFazio bill lists more than 58,000 signatories. In a pithy summary of Wall Street's perspective on the bill, one investment adviser titled his blog on the issue "Financial Transaction Taxes Would Cause Stock Market Crash."

Of
course, it's not surprising that Wall Street would resist the notion of
paying more for stock trades, which can be conducted at superhuman
rates thanks to computer programs used by banks and hedge funds. But would limiting DeFazio's tax to speculative trades on oil, widely blamed for last year's run-up in gas prices, arouse as much opposition?

Perhaps
not. Still much depends on the enforcement of the exemption the bill
carves out for "legitimate" oil futures trades conducted by truckers,
airlines, and other transportation interests that have a business
interesting in protecting against sudden shifts in oil prices.

More
than 80 percent of oil futures contracts on the New York Mercantile
Exchange were held by financial firms "speculating for their clients or
for themselves," according to a 2008 Washington Post investigation.
It's the drawing of that line between firms' clients and the firms
themselves that could hold the key to the tax's effectiveness -- and to
its political future.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog Los Angeles

Eyes on the Street: Caltrans Sidewalk Work on Alvarado

Caltrans $70M State Route 2 Multimodal Project is rehabbing and improving 5 miles of Santa Monica Blvd, Alvarado St., and Glendale Blvd.

December 3, 2025

San Bernardino Could Finally End One of Country’s Worst Zombie Projects: The ONT Connector

“The ONT Connector is an inappropriate investment. Ridership capacity and public transportation utility do not support spending billions of dollars for it. Scrapping the project is the right decision. Electric rail to ONT is the appropriate decision,” per The Transit Coalition

December 3, 2025

Support Streetsblog L.A. Today for a Better 2026

As 2025 comes to a close, we’re asking for your support to keep independent, people-centered transportation journalism alive in Los Angeles.

December 2, 2025

Baldwin Park Update: Progress on Path and Park Projects

The new connection from Walnut Creek Nature Park to the greenway walk/bike path is just about finished, and the huge expansion on Barnes Park is trooping along

December 2, 2025

Tuesday’s Headlines

ICE terror, masked ICE, rents, Koreatown traffic circle, housing, LAX, Culver City, South Pasadena, congestion, car-nage, and more

December 2, 2025
See all posts