Skip to Content
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Log In

Some thoughts today from one of the newest members of the Streetsblog Network -- from Missoula, Montana, Imagine No Cars.
The blog's author is a University of Montana student who
is chronicling his year of living without a motor vehicle. He calls the
blog "a journal of my journey to live a car-free lifestyle. An
experiment to bike, walk, and bus it through the next year of my life.
What will not using a car mean?" (
Check out his photostream on Flickr, too. Some nice stuff there.)

193715977_4fe07b6ffc.jpgPhoto of Missoula, Montana, by Justin Brockie via Flickr.

Car-free
living isn't all he's writing about, though. In a recent post, he
takes a look at Missoula's master-plan-in-the-making,  and in
particular the contentious issue of "Additional Dwelling Units," or
"ADUs" -- second residential units, like mother-in-law apartments or
rental apartments, added to existing residential properties:

Those opposed to ADUs claim they are worried
about the “character” of a neighborhood and the density that they may
bring with them. I may be wrong, but what I hear is that people don’t
want those with lower incomes mixing into their nice, high income
neighborhoods….

The reality is that this is an issue of
how we, as a community, want to accommodate future growth. Missoula
already has a large problem when it comes to supplying affordable
housing, so do we want to continue to build large apartment complexes
full of low and middle income residents on the edge of town, like those
built in the last few years around North Reserve? This creates an
additional problem of forcing people who have less means to afford
commuting to have longer commutes.

We have a choice to make. Do
we want development to occur on the edge of town, or do we want to
concentrate on infill? If we continue to grow outwards, large
developers, retiring farmers, and the construction industry win out
big, but Missoula will lose valuable farm land, open space, and
wildlife habitat that helps to make Missoula a great place to live,
while taking more money from taxpayers for infrastructure, increasing
congestion, and pollution. If we choose infill, we get to keep the
overall character of Missoula, keep the open spaces we love so much for
recreation, and create a more walkable community while giving
homeowners the ability to invest in their own property to provide a
better income and home for Missoula residents not lucky enough to
afford a home.

This blog is a great reminder of how
Streetsblog Network members around the country are thoughtfully
engaging the development process in all kinds of environments -- urban,
suburban, rural, semi-rural. We now are following 262 blogs
from 43 different states, and there's nothing homogeneous about them.
They're each seeking smart solutions to transportation and planning
problems on a local level. It's a pleasure to watch.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog Los Angeles

Friday’s Headlines

Metro K Line North, potholes, South Pasadena, Pasadena, trees, car-nage, and more

March 27, 2026

Metro Board Unanimously Advances K Line North Light Rail Extension

Mayor Bass backed off of her push for indefinite delays requested by some mid-city residents opposed to tunneling under their homes

March 26, 2026

Why Cities Need More “Agile” Streets

When projects are routed through a full capital-improvement workflow, solutions tend toward expensive, permanent interventions - not alternatives that might achieve 80 percent of the benefit at 10 percent of the cost

March 25, 2026

Wednesday’s Headlines

ICE, speed cameras, Ohio Avenue, North Metro K Line extension, SB79, streetlight repair, DIY, Olympics, car-nage, L.A. River path gate, and more

March 25, 2026

Monrovia Seeks Input on Draft Bike Master Plan

The deadline for public comment is this Friday, March 27 2026

March 24, 2026
See all posts