Skip to content
Sponsored

Carfree Montana

Some thoughts today from one of the newest members of the Streetsblog Network — from Missoula, Montana, Imagine No Cars. The blog’s author is a University of Montana student who is chronicling his year of living without a motor vehicle. He calls the blog “a journal of my journey to live a car-free lifestyle. An … Continued

Some thoughts today from one of the newest members of the Streetsblog Network — from Missoula, Montana, Imagine No Cars.
The blog’s author is a University of Montana student who
is chronicling his year of living without a motor vehicle. He calls the
blog “a journal of my journey to live a car-free lifestyle. An
experiment to bike, walk, and bus it through the next year of my life.
What will not using a car mean?” (
Check out his photostream on Flickr, too. Some nice stuff there.)

193715977_4fe07b6ffc.jpgPhoto of Missoula, Montana, by Justin Brockie via Flickr.

Car-free
living isn’t all he’s writing about, though. In a recent post, he
takes a look at Missoula’s master-plan-in-the-making,  and in
particular the contentious issue of “Additional Dwelling Units,” or
“ADUs” — second residential units, like mother-in-law apartments or
rental apartments, added to existing residential properties:

Those opposed to ADUs claim they are worried
about the “character” of a neighborhood and the density that they may
bring with them. I may be wrong, but what I hear is that people don’t
want those with lower incomes mixing into their nice, high income
neighborhoods….

The reality is that this is an issue of
how we, as a community, want to accommodate future growth. Missoula
already has a large problem when it comes to supplying affordable
housing, so do we want to continue to build large apartment complexes
full of low and middle income residents on the edge of town, like those
built in the last few years around North Reserve? This creates an
additional problem of forcing people who have less means to afford
commuting to have longer commutes.

We have a choice to make. Do
we want development to occur on the edge of town, or do we want to
concentrate on infill? If we continue to grow outwards, large
developers, retiring farmers, and the construction industry win out
big, but Missoula will lose valuable farm land, open space, and
wildlife habitat that helps to make Missoula a great place to live,
while taking more money from taxpayers for infrastructure, increasing
congestion, and pollution. If we choose infill, we get to keep the
overall character of Missoula, keep the open spaces we love so much for
recreation, and create a more walkable community while giving
homeowners the ability to invest in their own property to provide a
better income and home for Missoula residents not lucky enough to
afford a home.

This blog is a great reminder of how
Streetsblog Network members around the country are thoughtfully
engaging the development process in all kinds of environments — urban,
suburban, rural, semi-rural. We now are following 262 blogs
from 43 different states, and there’s nothing homogeneous about them.
They’re each seeking smart solutions to transportation and planning
problems on a local level. It’s a pleasure to watch.

Streetsblog has migrated to a new comment system. New commenters can register directly in the comments section of any article. Returning commenters: your previous comments and display name have been preserved, but you'll need to reclaim your account by clicking "Forgot your password?" on the sign-in form, entering your email, and following the verification link to set a new password — this is required because passwords could not be carried over during the migration. For questions, contact tips@streetsblog.org.

More from Streetsblog Los Angeles

Eyes on the Street: South El Monte’s Safe Routes to School Improvements

April 23, 2026

Thursday’s Headlines

April 23, 2026

Wednesday’s Headlines

April 22, 2026

The Week In Livable Streets

April 21, 2026

Tuesday’s Headlines

April 21, 2026
See all posts