I'd be laughing right now if I could just stop crying.
I
thought billions in taxpayer money and Wagoner's presidential dismissal
were supposed to mark the end of General Motors' bad plans, and I
naively hoped the company would replace Dummers with innovative
thinking, dynamic product design, maybe even switch some of its
production to light rail. Silly me.
GM's solution for
the future of transportation is, hold your breath, a Segway built for
two. I don't know about you, but I want my money back.
GM and Segway announced the prototype,
which they dubbed Personal Urban Mobility and Accessibility, or PUMA,
today in New York City, where the old single-occupancy stand-up Segways
are already illegal. The wheeled chair, which GM claims will address
congestion, safety, affordability, parking, and energy concerns in
urban areas, gets 35 miles per charge and does 35 miles per hour, a
blistering speed that makes them just slow enough to get run down by
the automobile company's more traditional vehicles.
Unfortunately
for those of us who already utilize a personal mobility device with
more than 100 years proven utility and health benefits, Dave Rand, GM's
Executive Director of Global Design, said on Brian Lehrer today
that he thought PUMAs should be able use bike lanes. Lehrer was
skeptical of the device, saying that the last time he heard of a
transportation "revolution" was when Segways were introduced, and he
noted how small a market share they currently have.
When
Rand was challenged by Lehrer on how they would fit in already dense
urban areas, where carving out room for a bike lane is as difficult as
it gets, Rand suggested that they would start using PUMAs on college
campuses and other areas that look nothing like cities.
Given
that Segways cost around $6,000, the new PUMA would likely be more
expensive. There are also concerns about safety and visibility, which
GM claims they'll solve with technology links to existing OnStar
systems so that the PUMAs will sense another vehicle and slow
automatically, at least other vehicles with OnStar.
Rand
said on Lehrer's show that users could charge the vehicle at home
overnight or where it is parked during the day, the implication being
that people have an easy place to plug in at night, as in, a garage.
Has Rand spent any time in a dense urban setting, where most people don't
have garages? Has he seen all those plugs coming out of the parking meters?
So which is it? An urban mobility device or the butt of another Kevin James joke? (Best use of a Segway has to be Weird Al's White and Nerdy)
GM's announcement comes a day after Ohio State released a study
that found 20 percent of preschoolers are obese. I know the
mega-corporation lampooned in Disney's Wall-E was meant to be Walmart,
but GM seems to be moving us a step closer to the Axiom Hover Chairs
that make physical activity quaint.
I seem to recall from a class in high school something about us
evolving to walk upright? It's funny then that we're finding physical
exercise will keep us alive longer. Rather than figuring out the
vagaries of how to incorporate an impractical new Segway into the urban
realm, cities should be making more room for walking
and cycling. The good ones already have.
Speaking of that, officer can you remove that thing from our nice new pedestrian plaza?