What Metro and Its Riders Will Lose in State Budget “Deal”

2_17_09_wad.jpg

Two articles written over the weekend highlight just how grim the new state budget is to transit riders, especially those in Los Angeles County.  For those of you that took off early on Friday, the Governor and legislature’s compromise budget, the one that continaully falls one vote away from passing, would completely eliminate the state’s transit operating subsidy for transit agencies.

The first piece was written by Kymberleigh Richards of the Southern California Transit Advocates and a Board Member of Metro’s San Fernando Valley Service Sector for the Daily News.  Richards points out that California voters, especially those in Southern California, have voted repeatedly to fund transit expansion and that the Governor’s frequent raids, enabled by the State Assembly and Senate, are a slap in the face to every voter that has ever voted for transit.  Especially those that supported Measure R.

Guess what will be tapped to backfill that loss?
That’s right – the Measure R funds that the voters approved to increase
service but will now be used just to maintain the status quo.

Making matters worse, the Measure R operating subsidy won’t be enough to replace all of
the lost state funds, so Metro may still have to cut as much as 160,000
hours of bus service next year to bridge the gap. So, even though the
voters of Los Angeles County voted for an increase in service, the
lawmakers in Sacramento will make it necessary for Metro to reduce
service instead.

Making matters worse, we can now see the impressive planned bus service increases that Metro would be proposing if the state wasn’t destroying the ability of transit agencies to expand.  At Metro Rider, Wad published the list of bus expansions that Metro was planning before the state budget crisis threatened to withhold over $230 million of transit subsidies.  If you’re a masochist and want a more complete picture of what Sacramento’s posturing is costing us, head over to Metro Rider and have yourself a good cry.

Photo: Wad/Flickr

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Why Isn’t Proposition 22 a Slam Dunk with Voters?

|
It seems as though voters would find a “yes” vote for Proposition 22 to be an easy decision.  After all, the proposition would end the state’s ability to decide that “we’re in a crisis” and could raid taxes dedicated to transit funding (as well as other local public services such as the police and fire […]

Cal Transit Association on State Budget: Armageddon Is Here

|
Yesterday, transit advocates from around the state strove to grapple with the new reality that Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and the state legislature’s "compromise" on the state budget completely abolished the State Transit Assistance (STA) and the $536 million that it dedicated to subsidizing transit operations. There are multiple villains in this story, but the blackest […]

SoCATA Backs Prop 91

|
What little conventional wisdom exists about Proposition 91, says that Prop. 91 is a ballot measure without any supporters. In the past couple of months, the California Alliance for Jobs, The League of Women’s Voters, LAist, and just random people around the Internet have all urged people to vote against Proposition 91. What’s especially weird […]

LA Times: State Should Act to Save Transit Funding

|
An editorial in today’s Los Angeles Times takes the Governor, the Democratic-controlled legislature, and pretty much everyone involved in the dramatic showdown in state government to task for their role in stripping transit funding in the proposed budgets that are floating around Sacramento.  Sounding more like Kymberleigh Richards or Bart Reed than the flagship newspaper […]