Will State’s New Sprawl Law Actually Contain Development?


Earlier this fall, Governor Schwarzenegger signed into law a piece of groundbreaking legislation that would address global warming by curbing sprawl development.  A recent piece in the San Francisco Chronicle takes a closer look at the legislation to see whether it will actually have an impact on how California grows.

The ultimate impact will depend on how the legislation is put into
effect, and whether its carrots and sticks will outweigh the cries from
people who don’t want big new buildings on their block.

Whatever the law’s accomplishments, proponents hope it sends a clear
message that will be reflected in future legislation and policies on
the state and local levels: Dense, transit-oriented development is a
critical goal for the collective good.

"A small step can be an important step if it’s the step that turns
the corner," said Tom Adams, board president of the California League
of Conservation Voters, the principal drafter of the legislation. "I
think it will change forever the way we look at land use in California."

This small step could have big dividends for California if the Governor empowers agencies to enforce the legislation as written.  During the debate before the legislation was passed, the California Progress Report outlined what the new law should accomplish:

The California Progress Report summarizes what the legislation does:

• Transportation planning: The California Air Resources Board (CARB)
will set regional greenhouse gas reduction targets after consultation
with local governments. That target must be incorporated within that
region’s Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), the long-term blueprint of
a region’s transportation system. The resulting model will be called
the Sustainable Communities Strategy.

• Housing planning: Each region’s Regional Housing Needs Assessment
(RHNA) – the state mandated process for local jurisdictions to address
their fair share of regional housing needs – will be adjusted to become
aligned with the land use plan in that region’s Sustainable Communities
Strategy in its RTP (which will account for greenhouse gas reduction

• CEQA reform: Environmental review will create incentives to implement the strategy, especially transit priority projects.

This article has gathered a lot of interest from around the Internet so far drawing stories from Planetizen and The City Fix.  However, no matter who looks at the issue, nearly everyone agrees that the deciding factor on whether this legislation will be more than just a "feel good" move will be in how it is enforced.  Will Governor Schwarzenegger empower state agencies to the point of overwhelming local pols in a ratable chase to build the biggest box on a street corner near you.

Photo: Exhuberance/Flickr


Is CEQA Reform Truly on Its Way? If It Is, Should We Be Happy or Worried?

California Forward released this video last November making the case for CEQA reform on transportation issues. There are nine days left in the legislative session in Sacramento, and there is still no vote scheduled in the Assembly on SB 731, Senator Darrell Steinberg’s efforts to “reform” California’s landmark environmental protection law, the California Environmental Quality […]

CEQA Reform Update: Is This the End for LOS?

Finally, some sanity may be coming to California’s most important environmental protection law, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Under current law, all projects, be they rail lines, bike plans, or new buildings would have to prove that it would not impact local driving times or it would have to complete a costly mitigation plan. […]

Governor Shocks Cyclists with “Give Me 3” Rejection, Approves Bills Making Infrastructure Improvements Easier

(Note: It was a busy 72 hours in Sacramento this weekend. Streetsblog will split it’s coverage of Governor Jerry Brown’s signings and vetos into two separate stories, one pertaining to bicycles, and a second post for everything else.) For the second year in a row, California Governor Jerry Brown issued a last-minute veto of legislation mandating […]