Skip to Content
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Log In
Air Quality

Trucking Groups Takes Ports to Court Over “Clean Truck” Plan

9_8_08_port.jpg

What is more important, the health and safety of people living near ports or the cost to truckers and consumers of helping truck carriers meet modern environmental standards and fairness towards independent truckers?  That question could be answered later today when a federal court hears arguments from the American Trucking Association against the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach.

The ports, to the wild approval of local residents and environmental advocates concerned about air quality, have decided to ban all pre-1989 trucks from the ports beginning on October 1 and slowly raise the bar on emissions standards that by 2012 all trucks will meet 2007 emission standards.

Concerns about the "concession agreements" between the ports and truck contractors lie at the heart of the ATA's lawsuit.  The plans the ports are proposing have been compared to agreements between landlords and tennants, giving the ports power over hiring practices, maintenance and employee health insurance.  The ATA argues that they are placing smaller carriers at a disadvantage, especially independent truckers that could be banned altogether from the Port of Los Angeles by 2012. 

While agreements have been reached between the ports and trucking companies representing literally thousands of truckers, the ATA is still concerned the agreements will have a long lasting negative impact on the industry.  From an ATA press release:

“ThePort of Los Angeles’ further intrusion into the competitive structureof the drayage market makes the ATA lawsuit even more important andillustrates precisely the type of disruption of trucking services inthe economy that Congress found so inefficient and disruptive,” saidATA President and CEO Bill Graves.“Creating an artificial, non-competitive market with highly inflatedcosts and prices hinders our national competitive ability and sets adangerous precedent.”

However, the ruling from today's lawsuit may not have much impact on
the long term prospects of the "clean trucks" program.  Art Wong,
spokesperson for the Port of Long Beach, tells the Contra Costa Times:

"But regardless of what thejudge does, we will move ahead with the fee and the ban on dirtytrucks," Wong said. "It might be trickier without the concessionagreement, but we're going to clean up these trucks one way oranother."

Photo: Chrisnu/Flickr

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog Los Angeles

Thursday’s Headlines

LAPD, potholes, green bike lanes, Metro policing, L.A. River, car-nage, and more

January 15, 2026

Metro Committee Approves Sepulveda Rail Alignment, Postpones Torrance Rail Approval

Plus: Metro announces a testing snag which means a likely delay for the D Line opening, and supports Foothill A Line extension to Claremont

January 14, 2026

Wednesday’s Headlines

ICE, LAX roadway expansion, Sepulveda subway, MLK parade, Pasadena, car-nage, and more

January 14, 2026

Tuesday’s Headlines

ICE, Sepulveda and Torrance Metro rail, Rail2Rail path, care-based services, Olympics, Measure ULA, Monrovia, Little Tokyo, car-nage, and more

January 13, 2026

This Week In Livable Streets

Metro board committees, Satoru Tsuneishi Park opening, Santa Fe Dam ride, and more

January 12, 2026
See all posts