Is Solair Really Transit Oriented Development?


Yesterday, Metro officials and executives from KOAR Development celebrated the "topping off" of the foundation for the Solair real estate project located just North of the Wilshire/Western Purple Line Station. Solair is part of Metro’s joint development program which "seeks to provide the most appropriate private and/or public sector development on Metro-owned property at, and adjacent to, transit stations and corridors." Metro claims the project will reduce auto dependency by allowing greater access to transit for residents at the 186-untit complex and shoppers.

But does Solair qualify as "Transit Oriented Development?" In today’s advertisement article in the Times, the writer finds space for one paragraph questioning how transit oriented Solair really is.

Critics, however, have questioned whether building housing near transportation lines gets motorists out of their cars. For example, the subway under the Solair does not make the link to the Westside, a key L.A. destination.

The Times doesn’t make the space to examine whether or not the unnamed critics have a point, and quickly moves on to a discussion of the Subway to the Sea. However, there is plenty of material to debunk or justify the critics’ claim. For example, the Times could have pointed out that there is a lot more transit access for residents of Solair than just the Purple Line. There are these things called "buses" which run at-grade along both Wilshire and Western. The transit center is a stop for two Metro local lines, the Wilshire Rapid line and a DASH route.

Of course, maybe the Times assumes that people paying at least $800,000 for a condominium aren’t likely bus riders.

The issue of cost for these units raises another question. Will future Solair residents, who will most likely be upper-class homeowners, take advantage of the transit options available? After all, it seems to be an unwritten rule in Los Angeles that the wealthy don’t take transit, and certainly wouldn’t be caught dead on a bus.

KOAR Development is betting that they, and future shoppers in the 40,000 square foot of retail, will not be transit riders. Every residential unit will come with two deeded parking spaces in the parking garage, to say nothing of guest parking. There is also parking set aside for the retail center. According to Reconnecting America, a California based transportation and development think tank, the average amount of parking at a residential development considered TOD is 1.41 spaces per unit in California.

By having this much parking on-site, KOAR Development undermines Metro’s claim that Solair is "transit oriented." Despite its location near transit and the relative walkability of Koreatown, residents are being encouraged to drive more than they are encouraged to take transit; after all they will be paying for two parking spaces when they buy their unit. People shopping at the retail center are also being encouraged to drive, as plentiful parking will make taking the automobile attractive to those wishing to shop at Solair.

It’s probably too late to do anything about the parking plans at Solair since the project is already under construction and residents have already bought units and parking spaces.  Hopefully future T.O.D. projects on built on Metro owned land will be more transit, and less parking, oriented.

Photo: Damien Newton


Mayor Breaks Ground on Westlake/MacArthur Park Development…But Is It TOD?

The good news is that there are 90 affordable housing units putting it miles ahead of the W and there are plans for retail on the ground level. A level of skepticism should be involved on the promises of on-street development can be excused because some of the developers are the same ones that were involved with the Hollywood and Western TOD, which currently has a fifty percent vacancy rate a full five years after the development opened.

TAD or TOD? A Look at the W at Hollywood and Vine

Nice car advertisement at the billboard. Photo: Erik Oginski/Flickr One of my favorite transportation rhetorical devices has always been the relationship between Transit Oriented Development, or TOD, and its evil brother, Transit Adjacent Development, TAD.  TAD breaks all the rules that make TOD work, but because they can look similar they often get confused.  Unfortunately, […]

Metro Did the Right Thing By Not Over-Parking Expo Line Phase 2

Metro’s Expo Line Phase 2 opens this Friday. Though there is a lot of excitement and praise for the line, the Expo extension from Culver City to Downtown Santa Monica has also received some criticism. Note that Expo Phase 1 weathered its own criticism, and exceeded expectations. Some critics are suggesting the line could be “doomed” […]

Ventura County’s New Parking Standards: A Guide for Los Angeles?

Photo:rsfrd/Flickr  One of the major impediments to really reforming transportation in Los Angeles is that everytime a new development goes in, the city’s parking requirements force developers to put in more than one parking space per unit…even if the development is "Transit Oriented" such as the wasted opportunity at Solair in Mid-Wilshire.  Unfortunately, changing the […]

The Urban Land Institute Takes Its Look at L.A.’s T.O.D.

Slauson Station.  T.O.D. Heck.  Photo: The Architect Newspaper Blog One thing that the National non-profit the Urban Land Institute and Streetsblog have in common is we both have strong views about Transit Oriented Development.  Another thing we have in common?  We both think the state of transit oriented planning in Los Angeles could really use […]