LADOT GM De La Vega on Better Data, Multi-Modalism and, Yes, Pedi-Cabs

We’re two for two in getting strong, substantial responses to a Streetsblog reader questionaire.  First Sargent David Krumer talked about the improved relationship between cyclists and the LAPD and now the new LADOT General Manager takes time to answer your questions on multi-modalism, data collection, budget issues and more.

While I didn’t expect De La Vega to wax poetic about cars, you would have to be insane to do that in a Streetsblog interview, I was surprised that he admitted there were areas where LADOT and the city needs to do better while also declaring that “LADOT will continue its leadership role in supporting the evolution of Los Angeles from an auto-centric to a multi-modal city.”

Personally, I found the answers to questions 4, 7, and 9 to be the most illuminating.  Let us know what you think in the comments section.

1. What is the total amount of the City of LA transportation budget?  What percentage of that is going towards walking and bicycling projects?

For fiscal year 2011-2012, the adopted city budget includes funding for bicycle and pedestrian projects from three sources of funds (1990 Proposition C half-cent transportation sales tax, 2008 Measure R half-cent transportation sales tax, and state 1/4-cent transportation sales tax).

The city has budgeted $12.8 million (9.8%) of the $129.8 million available from these three sources for bicycle and pedestrian projects.  For comparison, 6.1% of city residents bike or walk to work or work from home (Southern California Association of Governments, May 2011; data for 2010).

2. What would the city of Los Angeles’ mode share ideally be for you and how will you work towards achieving this?

3. It can be argued that LA’s current mode split is not sustainable economically or spatially, especially with rising gas prices, rising population, a number of people owning multiple cars, and many owning SUV type automobiles. If you agree LA’s current mode split will not  be sustainable in the future how will you use your responsibilities as LADOT General Manager to work towards a more sustainable mode split?

[Combined answer for #2 and #3]

Because of the historical development of land use patterns in the region, LA is very auto-centric.  This will not change overnight.  The challenge for Los Angeles is to expand the overall capacity of the transportation system and create viable alternatives to driving.  This includes: expanding the rail system (which is faster and more reliable than bus); maintaining a robust bus system (because rail will not connect every neighborhood in the near-term); making policy decisions that make transit more effective (such as the city’s transit priority system and bus lanes); and facilitating development patterns (transit oriented development) so that people have choices and can take transit, cycle, or walk instead of driving.

LADOT will continue its leadership role in supporting the evolution of Los Angeles from an auto-centric to a multi-modal city.  This includes: operating the second largest bus service in Los Angeles County (after MTA); continuing to partner with MTA to make its bus service more efficient (e.g. priority signals and bus lanes); implementing the city’s Bicycle Plan; improving pedestrian safety; supporting development of MTA’s rail and busway program; and working with Department of City Planning on new transit oriented plans.

4. Do you plan on measuring something other than car volumes on LA streets in a systematic and comprehensive way? We are data blind and shitty anecdote heavy when it comes to public debate about transportation in LA.

I agree that better data collection and analysis is needed.  Our goal is to collect multi-modal data on how people and goods move in the city, but we are constrained by limits in how data is collected.  For vehicular counts, we can extrapolate information from our traffic signal system and conduct automated studies of traffic volumes.  Transit volumes (vehicles and passengers) are available for the respective operators, including LADOT and MTA.  Bicycle and pedestrian counts depend on manual counting and are labor intensive.  We are partnering with the Los Angeles County Bicycle Coalition to collect updated bicycle data.

We also are using accident data to inform our priorities and funding recommendations.  For example, the state and UC Berkeley established a new GIS-based tool that shows crashes near public schools statewide.  We are using this data to prioritize our recommendations to City Council in applying for federal “Safe Routes to School” discretionary grants.

5. Mr. de la Vega – Would you support an ordinance that says, in effect “The speed limit for any portion of any street that is not less than 50% residential shall not exceed 20 mph. Such maximum speed limit shall be enforced by all available means, including but not limited to the introduction of traffic calming measures to bring such streets in compliance.”

I am supportive of traffic calming measures in general for local streets as designated in the city’s General Plan, though the current city budget does not provide resources for citywide implementation.  The city considers changes to the 25 mph residential speed limit on a case by case basis consistent with state law.  I would support lower residential speed limits on local streets if supported by the neighborhood as well as a state-required engineering and traffic survey.

Background: The California Vehicle Code Sec. 22352(a)(2)(A) describes the prima facie speed limit in a residential district as 25 mph unless changed as authorized in the CVC.  CVC 22538(a) allows the city to adopt a speed limit between 25 and 60 mph (in five mph increments) by ordinance if an engineering and traffic survey concludes that 65 mph is “more than is reasonable or safe”.  CVC 22538.4(a)(1) allows the city to lower the speed limit to 15 or 20 mph if an engineering and traffic survey is completed.  In residential districts, the speed limit may be further reduced to 15 or 25 mph near schools.

6. How can an effective leader who drives a hummer actually understand and help those that don’t drive at all.  Are you too wrapped up in car culture?

My professional career since the 1990’s has focused largely on improving public transit.

This includes expansion and innovation in the region’s bus service (e.g. federal consent decree and Rapid Bus development and expansion), developing new rail and busway projects (Orange Line, Wilshire BRT, Exposition, Crenshaw-LAX, Westside subway extension, etc.), and securing funding to build, operate, and maintain the transit system, including passage of Measure R, the countywide half-cent transportation sales tax in 2008.  Measure R guarantees at least 65% of funding goes to transit projects and operations.

7. What can be done to accelerate the implementation of the City’s landmark bike plan?

First, funding.  The City Council and Mayor already set aside at least 5% of the city’s Measure R local return funding for bicycle projects.  In addition, Mayor Villaraigosa successfully pushed MTA to increase the percentage of discretionary grant funds for bicycles from 7% to 15%.  Bicycle advocates should work at the local (Council and Mayor), regional (MTA), state, and federal level to push for additional bike funding.

Second, staffing.  Bicycle advocates should work with the Council and Mayor to push for more bike plan implementation staff.  In the short-term, this will be constrained by the city’s overall budget challenges.

Third, and perhaps most importantly, political support.  Bicycle advocates should work with the Council and Mayor to demonstrate community support for bike lanes and other bike facilities.

8. How do you determine who gets the final say over a street configuration on a residential street that is also used as a through-way?  Do the residents who live on the street get a weighted say in the matter or do the people who use the street for work and school commutes get the weighted say?

The street configuration is determined by the city’s General Plan as recommended by the Department of City Planning and LADOT and as adopted by the City Planning Commission (CPC), City Council, and Mayor.  Each city street receives a designation in the Transportation Element and respective Community Plan (land use element of the General Plan):

  • Local Streets – Intended to carry primarily local, residential traffic
  • Collector Streets – Designed for a mix of local travel with some through travel
  • Secondary and Major Streets – Intended to accommodate through traffic.

All members of the public may participate through public workshops as the plans are being developed and through public hearings during the plan review and approval process.  There is no formal “weighted say” in the process.  The CPC, Council, and Mayor consider public input and the technical advice of city staff during the approval process.

9. Have you heard, or participated in, any discussions about reforming what triggers a CEQA review so that it doesn’t focus so heavily on moving car traffic?

LADOT will be moving toward a multi-modal methodology that considers the impacts of a project on all modes of transportation.  In many cases, project deliberations will revolve around a policy decision, i.e. one mode of transportation may benefit while another does not, that will be decided by the Mayor and Council.

The recent discussion about peak-hour only curb bus lanes on Wilshire Boulevard illustrates this point.  Technical analysis by LADOT and MTA showed two major findings.  For transit, 29,000 bus riders during peak hours would save 10.1 minutes end-to-end.  For mixed flow, 24,000 persons in 20,000 vehicles would see end-to-end travel times increase 10.7 minutes with delays averaging 11 seconds per intersection where significant impacts were identified.  Because more people ride the bus than drive in this corridor and the travel time impacts are similar, there is a net benefit to implementing the bus lanes.

10. In 2008, there was some discussion of legalizing and regulating bicycle taxis, aka pedicabs.  Any chance those discussions will move forward again?

I support piloting pedicabs where supported by the community.  The city’s citizen Transportation Commission has a subcommittee reviewing this issue.

  • Jessica Meaney

    Just to clarify – the entire City of LA Transportation Budget for 2011-2012 is $129M? (for all transportation revenue the city sees- local, state and fed?) Can you link to the budget doc that the number comes from?  That’d be great – thx

  • Informative. Thanks, as always, Damien.

  • Ubrayj02

    The budget for the city of LA is complicated, so asking about the “transportation” budget can be answered lots of different ways.

    First, there is the LADOT’s budget.

    Next, there is the “Transportation” accounting category the city uses to identify the general use of a lot of different sources of money.

    There are a lot of one-time, or limited time, transportation sources of funding that sometimes don’t get included in either of the above categories.

    The .pdf budgets released online in years past were searchable. Since Gruel became the Controller, it’s been scanned .pdf images – impossible to search through quickly, and the budgets have been put together in a very sloppy way (in my opinion).

    The money that goes to bicycle and pedestrian projects comes from a variety of sources. A good chunk of it goes into a Capital Improvement Expenditure Program that I have never seen published nor explained.

  • El Farto

    Same garbage. Different day.

    He avoided saying anything meaningful.

  • Stephen Bewm

    Dude drives a hummer. That says it all.

  • Stephen Bewm

    Dude drives a hummer. That says it all.

  • Ubrayj02

    In the 2008-2009 budget (the last one that you can easily search through), the Consolidated Functional Distribution of money to “Transportation” was $4,247,451,680 – but that includes all sorts of transportation related costs.

    The LADOT’s budget was around $153 million – but that is just for the LADOT.

    Oh, and of course as soon as I bitched about never seeing the Capital Improvement Expenditure Program budget, I found it in the 2008-2009 budget. Doh!

    Jessica, from some earlier research I did, I found the following sources of money that already dedicate money to bike and pedestrian projects or can dedicate money to bike and pedestrian projects:

    Proposition C Anti-Gridlock Transit Improvement Fund
    2008 Measure R
    Special Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund
    Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Fund
    Proposition A Local Transit Assistance Fund

    De La Vega was totalling Prop C, Measure R, and another fund together and telling you what portion of those funds go to bike and pedestrian projects and staff in the 2011-2012 budget.

  • Anonymous

    He seems to get the big picture stuff, but that was never the concern. The question is how he will manage and *overhaul* an agency that has road widening in its DNA, so that he can actually implement the livable streets policies that he gives lip service to.

  • R H

    Let’s get moving on the pedicab thing.  Start in DTLA.  Looking forward to the info from this “citizen Transportation Commission subcommittee.”  Must be a super-secret high-level study going on.  Where can we get more info about the work they’re doing?

  • amanda

     The <a href="http://ladot.lacity.org/tf_safe_routes_school.htm"maps that LADOT put up for helping with Safer Routes to School are rather pointless. Were I a parent, I’d rather see where the most dangerous intersections are and what LADOT is going to do to make them safer instead of a map showing me where stop signs and stop lights are near the elementary school.

  • Katie Matchett

    Follow up to #1: Is there any info on what portion of the $12.8 million goes to bike projects vs. ped projects? As bike and ped infrastructure have virtually nothing in common (okay maybe that’s hyperbole, but this is a pet peeve of mine), I don’t find it particularly helpful to see combined funding figures for two totally different travel modes.

    Also, let’s not get mislead by that 6.1% figure for walking and biking. Commute trip patterns do not necessarily follow overall trip patterns, and I would expect a higher walking mode share if we considered all trips made in LA.

    Katie M.
    http://www.wherethesidewalkstarts.blogspot.com

  • Ubrayj02

    The breakdown of where that money goes is in specific schedules for the funding sources and the departments in the LA City Budget.

    I downloaded my (copies) of all the available budgets here:

    http://controller.lacity.org/AdoptedBudget/index.htm

    I have the names that those bike/ped sources are called in the budget below. Nobody does the type of analysis you are looking for in the advocacy scene (that I am aware of), so if you do it – please publish it and spread the word to the folks working on these issues.

    Asking a public official for this info is like demanding that they do your housecleaning as well. Yes, they should do it for you (I guess), but the conversation moves forward much faster if you can assemble these facts on your own and hammer them over the head with them in committee and private meetings.

  • Lufftwaffe Burrito

    Amir Sedadi and Rita Robinson hand walked that piece of shit into the Board of Transportation Commissioners a few years back and got their b.s. flushed down the toilet. That idea is dead in the water without some leadership from the mayor and a councilman or two. Unfortunately, campaign donor cab drivers and others that make money on stranded tourists in DTLA, all but ensure we’ll never get that kind of leadership. Plus, there is the baby-boomer joke of turning LA into a Blade Runner 3rd world nation, har har har, wots next? Jitneys? Laff laff.

    The sad part is that we will get bicycle taxis once local government has grown too weak to police the streets since we’re not doing anything to curb our overhead costs and still maintain a relatively high quality of life in the city.

    De La Vega on peak hour parking restrictions in business areas? De La Vega on traffic calming and making the city’s E&TS surveys more robust with respect to safety? De La Vega on racist promotion policies in the department? De La Vega on the LADOT’s red flagged status with Safe Routes to School money?

    The guy is there to make sure no LADOT cops film anymore porn in cars and that the Mayor has yet another puppet to waltz into meetings and tell people that all is well the happy sunshine new LADOT is here to save the day (by paving over your livelihood, the safety of your kids, and the purity of the air you breath).

  • Anonymous

    I’d just like the hear how much it cost to fill his vehicle-of-choice the last time he visited the filling station, and what he intends to purchase the next time he buys an automobile.

  • Tap Dat All On The Floor

    Really? Who f&%*ing cares? Yay! We all scored a a little victory by pointing out the guy owns a Hummer. Whoopdeedoo.

    Do you want to eject him from office? Then why don’t you belly up to the bar and order a tall glass of “Say what you mean, asshole.” Instead of wasting our time with this inane chatter about his vehicle.

    Really, what the hell do you have to add here? Your comment isn’t even funny.

  • Anonymous

    The issue is, does he recognize yet that the days of accommodating the automobile uber alles are over?  As Carlton said, LADOT has road widening in its DNA.  It’d be nice to know if he is planning to walk the talk.

    But who really cares since the City of L.A. is in its death throes anyway.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Insurrection at LADOT

|
“The rank and file has lost confidence in our general manager,” thundered Mike Hunt, an LADOT engineer and “proud” SEIU Union Steward. “He doesn’t listen to us. He ridicules us every chance he gets. He puts the blame on us for doing our job, and implementing the policies he put forth for us.” Hunt was […]

Your Q and A with Jon Kirk Mukri

|
You asked, he answered. Moments after going on hiatus for the holidays, I received an email from the Los Angeles Department of Transportation with answers from the “Reader Q and A” with interim LADOT General Manager Jon Kirk Mukri. Jon Kirk Mukri took over as interim general manager on December 1, taking over for Jaime […]

Council Approves Garcetti Nominee Seleta Reynolds to Head LADOT

|
In a unanimous vote 13-0 this morning, the Los Angeles City Council approved Seleta Reynolds, Mayor Eric Garcetti’s nominee to head the Los Angeles City Transportation Department (LADOT). The approval means that Reynolds will take the General Manager reins of LADOT starting August 11th, 2014. Reynolds replaces Jon Kirk Mukri, who became DOT’s head after former GM […]