Streetsies 2010: It Was the Worst of Times

Screen shot 2010-12-26 at 9.51.35 AM

In many ways, 2010 was just business as usual for the all-dominating car-culture.  Politicians and the police continue to say stupid things.  Cyclists and pedestrians are still getting run down in the street with near impunity.  The Metro Board of Directors still manages to muck things up, even when the whole county overwhelmingly backed a transit tax just two years ago.  2010: It was the Worst of Times

Dumbest Thing Said by a Politician

2010 Streetsie Award Winner: Governor proposes double-decking the 405

Reader's Choice: Dumbest thing said by a politician

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

There were a lot of dumb things written and said by politicians this year, but this statement by the Governor, implying that the multi-billion dollar expansion of the 405 is a nice first step, takes the case.

“This is why it is so important because we have this bumper-to-bumper traffic to go and build an extra lane and build out the 405 freeway,” Schwarzenegger said at a news conference at a Caltrans construction yard along Mulholland Drive. “And hopefully, eventually, we will build on top of the 405 Freeway because I think we need another freeway on top of the existing one.”

County Supervisor Mark Ridley-Thomas, who also serves as a Board Member for the Expo Construction Authority and Metro, lashed out that the grade-crossings for the Expo Line in South Los Angeles doom the area to “second class status” in an op/ed for the Business Journal.  Reasonable people can disagree on whether or not the grade crossings in South L.A. are good or bad for the area; but Ridley-Thomas’ op/ed is especially weird when you consider that two months later he told the New York Times that Expo is an important piece in redeveloping South L.A.

Greig Smith was certainly a visible presence on the pages of Streetsblog and he ended the year on a somewhat weird note.  In response to a question about the “anti-harassment ordinance” penned by Bill Rosendahl’s office, Smith wrote a statement basically saying the motion was a stupid waste of time, but he would vote for it.  Earlier in the year, while railing against a bicycle and pedestrian set-aside from Measure R funds, Smith argued that the set-aside was a waste because “10% of people don’t bike.”  Of course, 100% of people walk, but that’s apparently another issue.

In the Daily News, City Councilman Tom LaBonge wrote a great piece promoting transit expansion.  However, instead of focusing on promoting the Measure R projects that might get done in the forseeable future, LaBonge promoted his own route for a red line extension into the Valley.  While it’s not a bad idea in its own right, it’s so unlikely that Metro is going to undertake any major subway expansion projects besides those funded in Measure R that he might as well have said that he wanted to genetically engineer flying monkeys to carry us over traffic.

But the worst thing said by a city official was when the Mayor’s office let the taxi driver that caused his bike crash off the hook.  Streetsblog didn’t cover the statement, so it’s not a candidate for a Streetsie, but this “it was just an accident” mentality is one of the reasons that our streets remain so unsafe.

Villaraigosa thinks that the driver “wasn’t careful,” moving in front of him without using his signal, mayoral spokeswoman Sarah Hamilton said. But he does not think any charges should be filed.

“The taxi driver could have exercised more caution but what he did was not on purpose and it wasn’t illegal,” she said. “He just wasn’t proceeding with caution.”

Worst Sign That the Cops Don’t Get It

2010 Streetsie Award Winner: CHP Officer pens misinformation column on bike riding for local paper.  Gets defensive and condescending in even worse follow-up column.

Reader's Choice: Sign that cops don't get it

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

This category is ugly.  You might the feeling that the LAPD is at least trying to do the right thing by cyclists with their efforts to encourage cyclists to lock their bikes properly, and a P.S.A. campaign designed to encourage drivers to watch the road.  The controversial LAPD/LACM rides seem to be efforts in the right direction, even if they came as a result of officers harassing and kicking at cyclists in a May Critical Mass ride.  But that doesn’t mean that the 10,000 person law enforcement department always gets it right.  Nor does it mean that other agencies around the region are following the LAPD’s example.

Consider that these bloopers aren’t even close to the most frustrating ones, even though they both excuse fatally bad driving:

”He was just driving down the street and unfortunately, did not see the girls,” Bustos said. “The girls, when they were crossing the street, we don’t know if they saw the car.” (Driver kills one girl, maims another, and there’s no charge.)

“They agreed that it’s 50-50,” Mankarios said. “He violated the vehicle code, but in essence had she stopped, he would have gone right through and in front of her.”  (The victim was under no legal obligation to stop.)

No, the worst example of police confusion goes to California Highway Patrol Officer Al Perez who used his weekly syndicated column to attack a father who dared yell at a driver who endangered his son while crossing the street on a bike in a crosswalk.  That doesn’t sound so bad when compared to excusing deadly behavior.  After cyclists and lawyers pointed out that Perez didn’t know what he was talking about, Perez penned another column repeating the incorrect assertions made in the first one in a much more condescending manner.  Ignorance and arrogance, a deadly combination.

An honorable mention has to go to the Long Beach Police Department who seem intent on cracking down on group rides in their city.  First they broke up a Critical Mass and confsicated bicycles for failure to have a bike license, a seizure that is not allowed by state law.  Then they harassed and broke up another ride that had the goal of raising funds for those people wrongly ticketed and harassed on the first ride.  A hundred Charlie Gandy’s can’t make up for a police department that is clearly establishing itself as anti-bike if the bike owners don’t behave in a certain way.

NIMBY of the Year

2010 Streetsie Award Winner: The Beverly Hills NUMBY’s

NIMBY of the Year

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Pretty much everyone that’s fighting a transit project in Los Angeles is doing so because of fears that an at-grade train will mess up traffic and imperil their children.  However, there was one group that was fighting to keep a train from running underneath their town, the Beverly Hills NUMBY crowd.  The Not-Under-My-Back-Yard team raised the specter of an earthquake creating sinkholes underneath their schools and homes, just like what happened in that Tommy Lee Jones movie about the volcano underneath Los Angeles.  Armed with a lawyer and a boatload of mis-information, the NUMBY’s have hired a lawyer and threatened the entire Westside Subway project unless Metro builds the subway next to a fault line underneath Santa Monica Boulevard.  As you would expect from any fact-free, hysterical campaign, they seem to have found an ally with Supervisor and Metro Board Member Zev Yaroslavsky who penned a Metro Board motion urging staff to look at alternative routes for the subway.

You also have to tip your cap at the “Condo Canyon” group that successfully got “their” portion of the Wilshire BRT route removed from the final plan.  It was a great example of a group of well-connected people trumping the greater good of the entire region.  Naturally, they got a major assist from Supervisor and Metro Board Member Zev Yaroslavsky.

The Condo Canyon group was so successful they inspired other NIMBY’s to spring up to fight the BRT project in their area.  The Brentwood NIMBY group was a lot less successful than their brothers in the Canyon.  However, because Yaroslavsky got the Metro Board to change the project to favor his politically connected friends in Westwood, a new environmental study will be presented to the Board in a couple of months.  Fight on, Brentwood!  I’m sure you can convince him that bus-only lanes in your community is a bad idea too!

All of this probably makes Neighbors for Smart Rail jealous.  They’re lawsuit against the environmental documents for Phase II of the Expo Line appears to be headed to a legal defeat which would leave them with limited options other than more appeals.  If only this weren’t the only transit project that Yaroslavsky actually supports in his district.  Curses!

Biggest WTF?

2010 Streetsie Award Winner: Rita Robinson laments her lack of magical powers in changing the city.

Reader's Choice: WTF?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Leave it to LADOT to give us the year’s verbal low-light.  After the city was energized by the appearance of Janette Sadik-Khan, LADOT General Manager reminded us that L.A. is not New York when she compared New York’s new found pedestrian and bicycle friendliness as “magic.” It’s not magic, it’s good planning.

I guess it’s not the worst thing in the world that she stepped down as LADOT General Manager for a job with the county.  Speaking of the LADOT, they’re shocking inability to give a firm “yes” when asked at a City Council hearing if the Department could spend a paltry $3 million per year on bicycle and pedestrian projects was revealing.

Maybe the reason that LADOT couldn’t think of enough bike/ped projects was that they refuse to cover the expenses of sending a representative to the city’s official Bicycle Advisory Committee.  Good show!

And it was certainly a head-slapper when the Bureau of Street Services paved over the Sharrows pilot program on Westholme Avenue.  But that wasn’t nearly as insulting to Westside cyclists as the newest “throw it at the wall and see if it sticks” lawsuit by opponents of the Expo Line.  A group of homeowners have filed suit against the Expo Bike Path in an effort to gum things up for the rail line by forcing a broader environmental review.

Meanwhile, the black eye that won’t go away for Metro continues to fester.  If those fare gate machines were supposed to Keep Us Safe from Terrorists, what does it say that over two years after they were “partially installed” that they haven’t been activated?

The Mayor used a “balance the budget” website to stump for his plan to privatize Los Angeles’ parking garages and street parking.  The balance the budget game was an interesting attempt to get people to think about what kind of cuts the city should make.  There was only one problem.  It was impossible to balance the budget in the game without leasing all, or some, of the city-owned parking spaces.

Last but not least, really AEG?  You’re really going to build a new NFL football stadium and not need any new parking in the area?  I guess if you can win a national urban planning award for designing L.A. Live, you begin to think you can do anything.

Worst Media Coverage

2010 Streetsie Award Winner: Times mocks opponents of freeway widenings with soft, condescending language

Reader's Choice: Worst media coverage

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Hysteria over the Subway to the Sea environmental studies showing a scant reduction in traffic over the current conditions was met with a near universal meltdown in the mainstream press.  Our “alternative weekly” stuck up for the poor car commuters who won’t see “much benefit” from the project with the embarrassing story, “$9 Billion Subway-to-Sea Rip-off.”

But the worst of the worst has to come from the Los Angeles Times and their mocking, condescending editorial cheerleading for the I-710 Tunnel Project.  In addition to ignoring all of the impacts that this kind of project will have for the region, they completely dismiss the idea that increased highways result in increased congestion.  Of course, the Times is probably right when it implies that people who argue that large freeways induce traffic are victims of “bizarre thoughts.”  That’s why L.A.’s massive freeway system has so little congestion at rush hour.

Some other lowlights include:

Best Example of a Highway Project That Is a Waste of Money

2010 Streetsie Award Winner: Mammoth Widening of the 405

Reader's Choice: Worst Highway project

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Living on the Westside, it’s hard to think of a highway project that makes less sense than another widening of the I-405.  Really?  It makes sense to anyone to spend $4.5 billion to create years of congestion and confusion just to add a couple of carpool lanes to one of the most congested highways in America?  That really makes sense to anyone in this day and age?

Meanwhile, up in the northern part of the county, the politicians don’t just want to expand highway capacity, they want to actually turn a two lane road into a six lane highway to basically move more trucks through the area.  Won’t they be surprised that when they roll out the welcome mat for truck traffic, that the traffic actually comes in record numbers.

Meanwhile, advocacy for the 710 Tunnel Project continues unabated.  There was some good news for opponents in 2011.  It appears that Supervisor Ara Najarian’s efforts to get a true cost estimate for the project are going to come to fruition.  Given that estimates for the build range between $1 billion and $11 billion, it seems that the Board should have an idea before wasting spending millions of dollars for an environmental review.

  • anty

    The useless metro turnstiles are a test of how friendly Angelen@s are to the confused tourists who diligently swipe their paper tickets waiting for a sign that it is ok to pass through the gate. Would it kill metro to put a sign up or are they too embarrassed?

  • Plane

    AEG has said they need two additional lots for the stadium…It’s not true they don’t need new parking…

  • Plane

    Here’s one example where their need for parking is mentioned, by Downtown News publisher Sue Laris, she twittered about it

    “Addresses parking. 32000 parking spaces nearby. Need another 4000. Renovate cherry st parking lot. AEG NFL #dtla”

    http://twitter.com/suelaris

  • That’s good, because I thought they were crazy. But here they clearly state that parking isn’t an issue:

    http://www.sportingnews.com/nfl/story/2010-11-15/sbj-aegs-los-angeles-stadium-draws-on-cowboys#ixzz15OmdRUgC

  • Plane

    AEG says “Parking won’t be a problem.”

    He never says they won’t need new parking.

    If you call AEG, they will tell you they need two lots.

  • Turnstiles/ fare gates don’t belong on a WTF list. People who are too stupid to use them belong on a WTF list. Transit advocates who act like turnstiles are the end of the world belong on a WTF list. People who act like luddites because London Underground, NYC MTA, Tokyo Metro and BART must be insane belong on a WTF list.

    L.A. Live isn’t perfect, but it also doesn’t belong on a WTF list. It was designed and built for convention goers. Huh, it’s across the street from a convention center. Go figure.

  • Spokker

    Tokyo Metro’s farebox recovery is above 100%, 170% to be exact. They better damn well have turnstiles.

    LA? Not right now.

  • Turnstiles in general = not great but perhaps tolerable

    Turnstiles as done by Metro = stupid, racist, anti-rider, wrong, an inexcusable waste of money, time, space, metal, etc.

    Metro’s turnstiles and the cattle pens surrounding them should be sawn off and thrown into the lava pits shown in the third Lord of the Rings movie. See my earlier commentary on them here: http://laecovillage.wordpress.com/2010/05/04/a-tale-of-two-transit-stations/

    LACBC’s Aurisha Smolarski and I rode the Metro Red Line up to North Hollywood for the Bike Plan Planning Commission meeting. The NoHo station features a particularly irritating pen that forces elevator users to go ~20′ out of our way. Aurisha and I went up the elevator with two elderly Latina women. I was very happy to see them exit via the much more convenient and direct don’t-push-this-red-button-because-alarm-will-sound exit, instead of going the long way around. We followed them…

  • Wait, how are turnstiles racist? Do they only turn for white people?

  • I think that the way Metro installed them is racist. They’re wide open at more suburban Green Line stations, and closed prison pens in central urban Red Line stations. Read this and see pictures here: http://laecovillage.wordpress.com/2010/05/04/a-tale-of-two-transit-stations/

  • Joe Linton, you cherry-picked two train stations. I hope that you at least recognize that the key issue in Los Angeles is not race but income disparity.

    I do concede that the elevator entrances could have been better designed. But that is an isolated issue; a tiny bump in a program which is still being implemented. They ought to put fences in El Segundo.

  • huh? @James Fujita – I strongly disagree that fences should be installed El Segundo Metro Stations. I sure wasn’t asking for the whole Metro system to look and feel as shitty as the turnstile pens are in my neighborhood. Metro should either tear out all the turnstile pens… or, as you state, should be re-designed and reworked to actually be conducive to walking and using transit.

    The “tiny bumps” are important. If we pay attention to the details that makes systems actually work for humans, then our transit systems will be useful and welcoming for the diverse range of Angelenos that depend on them.

    As you state, income disparity is important… and it corresponds to race.

  • I’ll let Magic Johnson know that he’s poor the next time I see him ;) Race is important, but it’s not a direct correlation.

    “Bigoted” is a better word to use if you think that the gates are anti-black, anti-female, anti-gay or anti-poor.

    Ah, but seriously… in the interests of fairness, all stations should be equal, or at least offer equivalent services. Since the stations were built first and the turnstiles installed afterwards, a few awkward situations are inevitable — in other words fences at either the top of the elevator or at the bottom. They can be decorative fences, but fences nonetheless.

    This is a flaw which will be resolved with future stations. I believe the Expo Rail stations are better designed.

    Soon enough, these bumps will be smoothed out, and L.A. rail riders will be as comfortable with fare gates as my obaachan in Tokyo (who climbs subway stairs on an unlimited senior pass).

  • You state that I’ve cherry-picking stations… then you bring up Magic Johnson as an example to tell me that race doesn’t correspond to income. Huh? Would you like for me to give you statistics that show that race generally corresponds to income for Los Angeles neighborhoods?

    You state that Metro’s turnstiles represent “A few awkward situations”… This belittles the reality on the ground. For me, they represent an insult nearly every time I board the train. More often than not, I have to go through red alarm gates to get my bike in and out of stations. Same for folks with strollers and shopping roller-cars. It’s wrong. It’s indefensible. The turnstiles are anti-rider and are installed in an inequitable, yes – racist way. In the interest of fairness, mobility, accessibility, intelligence, design, dignity, equity, civil rights, and more, Metro should tear out (or at a minimum, as you’ve suggested, redesign) the wrong-headed turnstiles.

    I am, frankly, very surprised to find anyone defending these turnstiles as installed… anyone who’s not profiting from them. My suspicion is that the reason that they were implemented in the face of an uncommonly unified opposition (from rail and bus advocates who don’t always agree) is that they are the product of a crony contractor. What’s your interest in supporting them, James?

  • Spokker

    Wilshire/Vermont is situated in a much more urban environment than Marine. It probably also has higher ridership. I don’t like the fare gates, but I don’t think they’re racist.

  • Spokker

    “Ah, but seriously… in the interests of fairness, all stations should be equal, or at least offer equivalent services.”

    Striving for equality usually results in inefficiency. All stations shouldn’t be equal because not all places are equal in all characteristics. Many light stations, unless things have changed, are not even going to have fare gates. Many of these stations sans fare gates are in poor black or Hispanic areas. Where does that leave the racism angle?

    People complain that their ticket is always checked on the Blue Line but not on the Gold Line. Well, the Blue Line probably has more fare evasion than the Gold Line. Of course, if would be easy for anyone to make a misinformed connection between racism and more checks on the Blue Line.

    In other words, this race bullshit makes us insane.

  • Spokker

    “What’s your interest in supporting them, James?”

    He’s a fucking anime fan who likes trains. He’s not connected. Of course, anyone who disagrees with you MUST have ulterior motives, am I right?

  • Erik G.

    Spokker: Metro didn’t buy/lease any faregates from CUBIC.

    Those are turnstiles.

    If they were faregates, they could be propped open until the whole TAP debacle is sorted out and no tourists would be waving paper tickets against the TAP targets and waiting for an OK sign to light.

    This would also be far more ADA-friendly all around.

  • Spokker

    You’re preaching to the choir.

  • Spokker: Another way to look at it is, I’m a train fan who likes anime, since I fell into the one twisted obsession BEFORE I fell into the other one. The two are actually tangentially related as the best of each have the same source nation.

    Joe: I don’t work for CUBIC, and I don’t work for the MTA, more’s the pity, because they clearly need PR people.

    I will admit that I do appear to be in the minority as far as Southern California-based rail transit nerd opposition to turnstiles are concerned.

    Whether that negative attitude extends across the board to all rail transit users, I can not say. Oftentimes, rail transit fans find themselves really pissed off about stuff which the average user isn’t even aware of.
    (Railfan: “OMG! The windows are too small!” Average Joe: “…”)

    Erik: I do agree that faregates would be better than turnstiles. Tokyo has lovely, wonderful faregates which open like a dream. BART has faregates, and I hear that MUNI Metro is switching. Still, I do think turnstiles are a step in the right direction.

    I would add that they DO have faregates, at least at the stations I have been to. In fact, these faregates are specifically designed for ADA compliance and bicycles, etc.

    To all three of you guys: Let me backpeddle a little on my “fairness” comment and say that I’m fully aware that, for example, MUNI has gates in the tunnels but no gates out in the Sunset or the Mission districts. It makes no sense to have turnstiles at “stations” which don’t, technically speaking, even exist.

    By comparison, even the simplest Blue Line station has ticket machines, platforms, artwork, benches, video cameras, etc. Equality does not mean that every station must be designed alike, however they should at the very least
    Joe Linton has complained that one station has fences at ground level while another doesn’t. I figured, to be fair they should all have fences. At some stations, if the elevator comes up at the far end of the station, they might be able to put the turnstiles on the far end of the platform and avoid the whole “cage” issue.

    The terrorist security angle is a red-herring made of baloney. The money was available, the MTA took it. End of story.

    A much more sensible explanation is: the system is growing, and Metro doesn’t have enough fare checkers to patrol Expo Line and Foothill AND Crenshaw AND the existing rail lines.

    And they’ll move to a distance-based fare once they’ve determined that TAP is ready. TAP + distance-based fares = faregates or turnstiles.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Schwarzenegger Proposes Making the 405 a Double Decker Freeway

|
To the casual observer, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger seems like an environmental crusader.  He signs anti-sprawl legislation, he sues the federal government over emission standards for automobiles, he flies around the world to attend greenhouse gas conferences. But to those of us that live here and have been working to clean and green our transportation system; […]

An Ode to Bill Rosendahl

|
I had to look up the date, but I’ll never forget the time I ran into City Council Member Bill Rosendahl on the evening of June 14. I ran into my Councilman in our usual place, the produce section of the Whole Foods on the corner of National and Barrington. The usually ebullient Rosendahl was […]

Quote of the Day

|
The Connection Between the Costa Mesa Freeway and I-73 From an article in Today’s LA Times on the chronic congestion problems on the Costa Mesa Freeway in Orange County, an Orange County mayor comes so close to figuring out the problem with trying to widen your way out of congestion: Tustin Mayor Jerry Amante said the […]

Your Streetsblog Voting Guide for Tomorrow’s Mayor’s Race

|
The 2013 Mayoral Election ends tomorrow. We’ve been covering the election for almost a year and a half. As Laura Nelson’s piece in the Los Angeles Times today shows, one has to look closely to find the differences between Council Member Eric Garcetti and Controller Wendy Greuel on transportation and Livable Streets issues. Both support […]

Freeway Expansion Coverage Focusing on Construction Delays, Still Missing the Magic Question

|
Three years of construction.  Massive Delays. Circuitous detours. A $277 million price tag. Unfortunately, arguments about sprawl and damage to the environment haven’t proven to be winners when convincing the larger public that massive highway widening projects are hurting, not helping congestion.  However, a shift in how these widening projects are covered, with a sharp […]