Brookings: Feds Should Stop Giving Transit Projects the Run-Around

transit_housing_stats.gif
Americans are moving to areas with better transit access, but their options are limited.

Via Dave Roberts at Grist, this congressional testimony from Robert Puentes of the Brookings Institution [PDF]
is a must-read for anyone interested in how the country can reduce
dependence on cars and fossil fuels. High gas prices and soaring
transit ridership have exposed the shortcomings of local transit
systems, Puentes reports: 54 of the nation’s 100 largest metro areas
have weak bus systems and no rail service. The federal funding
mechanism is a major culprit:

One
reason the metropolitan transportation system — which should serve as
the connective tissue within and between metropolitan areas — is
woefully incomplete, is due to flaws in federal policy.

Federal
transportation policy has long favored highway building over transit
investments. Transit projects are evaluated and funded differently than
highways. The pot of available federal transit funding is so small that
the federal government oversees a competitive process for new transit
funding, requiring multiple hypercompetitive bureaucratic reviews that
demonstrate a project’s cost-effectiveness. Funding is also subject to
annual congressional appropriations. Highways do not undergo the same
level of scrutiny or funding uncertainty. Also, while highways
typically receive up to 80 percent of federal funds (and 90 percent for
improvements and maintenance), new transit projects’ federal
contribution is often less than half of the project cost.

Taken
together, these biases ensure that state transportation policy pursued
under federal law works against many metropolitan areas’ efforts to
maintain modern and integrated transportation networks.

Puentes delivered his testimony to the Senate Banking Committee, which has been considering emergency funding for local transit agencies.
Read the whole thing for a good overview of how transportation and
land-use policies can be improved as we approach the renewal of the
huge five-year federal transportation bill.

Graphic: Brookings Institution

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

STREETSBLOG USA

Top 10 Reasons to Oppose the House Transpo Bill

|
Congress is in recess this week, but that doesn’t mean the furor surrounding the House transportation bill has died down. Transportation for America has put together a top ten list of the reasons opposition to the bill is so strong. Here’s one of the lesser known implications: #7. Requires More Bureaucracy at Transit Agencies: In […]
STREETSBLOG USA

Sneak Preview: 2013 in Transit

|
Bus rapid transit projects in Austin, Tampa, and the Twin Cities. Streetcars in St. Louis, New Orleans, and Detroit. Those are just a few of the transit projects beginning construction or entering service in 2013, which looks to be a pretty good year for transit expansion in the U.S., says Yonah Freemark at the Transport […]
STREETSBLOG USA

Looking Ahead to the Year in Transit Expansion

|
After significant transit construction in the United States in 2014, the next year will see another impressive round of groundbreakings and new openings. That’s according to Yonah Freemark at the Transport Politic, who has catalogued major transit expansion projects throughout the U.S. and Canada for the last six years. In 2015, we’ll see major light rail projects begin […]
STREETSBLOG USA

House Transpo Bill Spells Trouble for Transit Projects Across America

|
A provision in the House GOP’s new transportation bill threatens to upend how transit agencies fund major capital projects, delaying or killing efforts to expand and maintain rail and bus networks. The Surface Transportation Reauthorization and Reform Act (STRR), released Tuesday and marked up in committee yesterday, would change funding rules for the three federal programs […]