Metro Board Approves Studies of Congestion Pricing and TNC Fees

Congestion pricing could solve many L.A. problems, but where will be most appropriate to pilot? Photo by peter boy12qq12 via Wikimedia
Congestion pricing could solve many L.A. problems, but where will be most appropriate to pilot? Photo by peter boy12qq12 via Wikimedia

Today, the Metro Board of Directors approved studying two new transportation programs that help reduce congestion while raising revenue: congestion pricing and taxing ride-hail trips.

The board has been kicking around congestion pricing for a few months now; it was initially raised as a way to generate some funding to help complete transportation projects in advance of the 2028 Olympics. See earlier Streetsblog coverage for background on:

Metro’s road pricing initiative, now called “The Re-Imagining of L.A. County,” is a 12-24 month feasibility study of congestion pricing, including a strategy for addressing equity.

Today’s motion approving a study doesn’t mean that pricing will sail through tomorrow and be immediately imposed on the hard-working bloodmobile driver. Even in approving the studies, many Metro boardmembers continued to express concerns and skepticism. Metro CEO Phil Washington reassured the board they would still have “several more bites at the apple.” In the coming months, the board will review the study’s scope, award the study contract, and ultimately decide whether to proceed with any congestion pricing program proposed.

The motion also approved “exploring fees” for ride-hail (Lyft, Uber – also called TNCs – Transportation Network Companies) trips. A couple of boardmembers expressed the concern that ride-hail fees should go to local cities. Chief Innovation Officer Joshua Schank responded that Metro would be working together with local municipalities to build a coalition for a TNC fee.

A separate 28 by 2028 motion decoupled congestion pricing and ride-hail revenues from Olympics project acceleration. The motion directs Metro to continue to get projects ready for acceleration, while “prioritiz[ing] low-risk revenue sources,” including state and federal monies.

While today’s approvals represent small steps forward for congestion pricing, TNC fees, and project acceleration, time will tell what will actually get implemented.

For additional coverage of these approvals, see: The Source, Urbanize, and Curbed.

 

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Tomorrow’s Big Metro Board Agenda Item: Expanding Congestion Pricing

|
An Exit for Los Angeles off I-210 Headlining tomorrow’s meeting of the Metro Board is a motion by County Supervisor Michael Antonovich requiring staff to examine other highways where Metro could implement congestion pricing.  Antonovich wants the study completed by June’s Metro Board Meeting.  To see the the rest of tomorrow’s agenda, click here. Antonovich’s […]

Ridley-Thomas Introduces Congestion Pricing Legislation

|
Locked in a tight battle for the Board of Supervisors seat held by Yvonne Burke with City Councilman Bernard Parks, State Senator Mark Ridley Thomas may have taken a risk by introducing S. 1422, the enabling legislation that will allow Metro to move forward with it’s plan to bring congestion pricing to Los Angeles. While […]

Feds Helping Metro Move to HOT Lanes.

|
Traffic Patterns Could Change on the I-10 with the Coming of Congestion Pricing The Federal government has chipped in $213 million to help Metro convert HOV Lanes into a type of toll lane known as a HOT Lane.  HOT Lanes are managed toll lanes with a user fee varies based on the amount of people in […]