Skip to content
Sponsored

Neighborhood Council Coalition Backs Away from Anti-Road-Diet Motion

At the urging of safety advocates, the L.A. Neighborhood Council Coalition has shifted a proposed anti-road-diet motion to be more neutral.
11:24 AM PST on January 4, 2019
Neighborhood Council Coalition Backs Away from Anti-Road-Diet Motion
At safety advocates urging, the L.A. Neighborhood Council Coalition has backed off of a anti-road-diet motion. Pictured is the First Street road diet in Koreatown. Photo: Joe Linton/Streetsblog L.A.

Last month, mobility and safety advocates responded to a proposed anti-road-diet motion. The item was before the L.A. Neighborhood Council Coalition (LANCC), an unofficial but relatively influential body that consists of representatives from L.A.’s elected neighborhood councils. The motion would have demanded that L.A. “remove all traffic calming measures, including… road diets” on various types of streets.

The December LANCC meeting featured a presentation from just one side of the issue: Chris LeGras of Keep L.A. Moving (KLAM). In writing and in person at the meeting, numerous livability advocates urged LANCC not to approve the motion. LANCC then postponed the motion until its January meeting, which will take place tomorrow at 10 a.m. at the L.A. Department of Water and Power headquarters at 111 N. Hope Street in downtown L.A.

Tomorrow’s meeting agenda was just posted to the LANCC website this morning. The agenda shows that LANCC has backed off of the KLAM anti-safety stance, only calling for communities to be consulted on road diet projects. The revised motion now reads:

[LANCC] takes the position that there shall be no blanket prohibition of road diets; some are beneficial and some are not. [LANCC] recognizes the beneficial effects of a road diet along certain corridors, but road diets create confusing, negative effects along other corridors. Communities that will be impacted with a potential road diet, including neighborhood councils, shall be consulted extensively both before and after road diets are proposed.

The language is not perfect. It sounds a bit too similar to mealy-mouthed journalism picking spokespeople from each side of an issue, like: “some people think climate change is happening, some people think it is not.” Nonetheless, the big changes represent a victory for safety advocates, as the LANCC is no longer parroting KLAM’s pernicious road diet rhetoric. LANCC approval of largely-neutral language would likely mean that few neighborhoods councils would take up similar copycat motions, as the Rampart Village Neighborhood Council did in mid-December.

The L.A. County Bicycle Coalition and others are still urging safe streets advocates to show up to tomorrow’s meeting, which could feature modifications – either positive or negative – to the road diet motion. The meeting agenda also includes the Mobility Bill of Rights and a mayoral staff presentation on the next round of Great Streets Initiative challenge grant funding.

Streetsblog has migrated to a new comment system. New commenters can register directly in the comments section of any article. Returning commenters: your previous comments and display name have been preserved, but you'll need to reclaim your account by clicking "Forgot your password?" on the sign-in form, entering your email, and following the verification link to set a new password — this is required because passwords could not be carried over during the migration. For questions, contact tips@streetsblog.org.

More from Streetsblog Los Angeles

The Week In Livable Streets

April 21, 2026

Tuesday’s Headlines

April 21, 2026

Metro Still Planning 605 Freeway Widening Mega-Project, Additional $46.9M Slated to be Approved This Week

April 20, 2026

Monday’s Headlines

April 20, 2026

Friday’s Headlines

April 17, 2026
See all posts