Santa Monica City Council Unanimously Rejects Hard Cap on E-Scooters, Moves Forward with 16-Month Shared Mobility Pilot

Image via City of Santa Monica
Image via City of Santa Monica

This article first appeared at SBLA sister site Santa Monica Next.

Last night, the Santa Monica City Council unanimously rejected the staff proposal to cap the number of electric rental scooters in the city to 500 per operator and 1500 total. While the scooter cap could have been raised in the future, the council found that the cap was too hard and ran counter to the city’s stated goals of reducing car dependency and increasing transportation options for residents and visitors.

“There’s no denying the popularity and ease of shared mobility devices that can help Santa Monica reach its goal of being a multimodal city,” said Santa Monica Mayor Ted Winterer. “Yet we must balance that with a serious need to hold companies accountable to ensure responsible behavior on our streets and sidewalks. This pilot approach will allow us to understand usage and operations in order to create a long-term program that establishes a safe, equitable and sustainable mobility option in Santa Monica.”

The Council did approve many of the city staff’s recommendations for a 16-month pilot program for dockless, shared mobility devices, including e-scooters and e-bicycles. There will be a cap on the number of devices that changes based on the device usage. Staff assured the Council that the “dynamic cap” would not become a backdoor way for the city to institute its original proposal on the number of scooters or bikes in use.

To implement the dynamic cap, the vendors will be required to share data with the city in real-time. The data will also be used to assure that the scooters are spread throughout the city, and not just clustered in areas most frequented by tourists – in effect making sure that scooters and bikes are available for residents to use.

For its part Bird, who is both the city’s first e-scooter operator and its largest, seems happy with the resolution.

“Bird and the city of Santa Monica share similar goals – eliminate greenhouse gas emissions and provide people alternative transportation options that reduce the number of cars used throughout the city,” says Rebecca Hahn, Bird spokesperson. “During the Council meeting on Tuesday evening, members of the community saw this alignment come to life and were part of an important and productive discussion.”

The pilot program will allow up to four providers in the city, split evenly between two scooter providers and two e-bike-share providers that could provide direct competition for the ubiquitous “Hulu Bikes” aka Breeze Bike Share funded by the city and Metro.

Responding to a concern by Councilmember Sue Himmelrich, who professed to ride the scooters herself, the existing providers promised to work with the city on ways to deliver helmets to users in a quicker way. Bird already provides helmets to users by mailing a helmet when requested, but will also work with the city to provide helmets for short-term users, including tourists.

The program will also provide solutions to some of the most common complaints that residents have about scooter programs in other cities: improperly parked scooters and no clear way to register complaints about unsafe scootering or parking.

The pilot will require operators to develop systems that will remedy improper parking, including pick up/drop off zones and incentives and enhance operator customer service and responsiveness to resident and user complaints, including a 24-hour hotline.

“As a result of the thoughtful and diligent work the city staff and Councilmembers performed, Santa Monica residents will continue to have access to e-scooters which serve as a reliable, inexpensive and environmentally friendly mode of transportation,” continues Hahn.

The program will also include two of the least controversial portions of the originally proposed program.

The city will bring on two full-time employees – one program coordinator and one enforcement liaison – to implement the pilot program.

To pay for the program, each operator will be assessed a base operator fee of $20,000, and then a scalable per-device fee of $130 per year. Council directed staff to explore a possible use-of-public-space fee. The fees will be re-examined as the pilot program closes.

“A key component of this program’s success is the partnership with operators, ensuring a focus on rider safety and solutions that preserve our public spaces for everyone’s enjoyment,” said Anuj Gupta, Deputy City Manager and Director of Policy. “This collaborative approach will position us to develop policies that expand transportation options while respecting our community’s needs and mobility demands.”

Vending permits for existing approved operators such as Bird and Lime expire at the end of the fiscal year on June 30, 2018. To facilitate a smooth transition to the pilot, Council passed an emergency ordinance last night requiring Fiscal Year 2018/19 permits for such operators to expire on September 16, 2018, just before the pilot kicks off on September 17, 2018.

  • AlexHirsch

    As far as I know, Breeze bike share is not funded by Metro. Metro has its own bike share system that has two stations in Santa Monica, as well as in Venice and elsewhere.

  • Jason

    It sounds like this went a lot better than it could have. Based on what’s being said here, I mostly hope that the pick-up/drop-off zones requirement
    doesn’t recreate the situation of Breeze stations nominally being spread
    throughout the city, but at too low a density.

  • travelfar

    Breeze is primarily funded via an old Metro bike share grant that Santa Monica received and started using before Metro selected a bike share operator. (hence the tiny Metro logo stickers on Breeze bikes)

  • Jason

    Breeze bikes do have a Metro logo on theme, but I’m not sure if that’s just because you can pay for them.

  • Ray

    The most interesting part of the Pilot is that their are recommendations for scooters don’t even currently apply to cars, like:
    1. Limiting the total number of devices (I wish we had a limit on total number of cars!)
    2. Equipment needs a maximum speed

  • James Fujita

    But clearly cities do want “a maximum speed” for cars. That’s why speed limits exist.

  • Jason

    But clearly see speed limits for cars as more of a suggestion considering things like overly-wide roads and the fact that the state legally requires speed limits to be increased if too many people are exceeding the posted limits.

  • James Fujita

    It’s a “suggestion” which is written into law and enforced by police. If it was really just a suggestion, the city could adjust the limits at any time without going through the legal process.

  • Ray

    Still, the government doesn’t require electronically controlled speed limits on cars, even though the technology exists. Somehow a 20 pound scooter needs to have more safety controls than a 3000 pound car.

  • LazyReader

    Banning scooters, another attempt to deride a practical solution to urban congestion the government cannot. Their solution, Spend billions to expand transit servicesout to the boondocks rather than fix it’s current stock that’s dilapidated and broke. E-scooters are great. THEY WORK. E-scooters can be an annoyance, but with little enforcement they can work in Santa Monica.
    – They don’t need to be parked….even taken indoors and out of the way of vandalism and theft.
    – They’re cost effective
    – Their range; granted it’s no car but the typical battery life is 15 miles, so you can go anywhere within downtown radius.
    – Unlike bicycles they don’t ride up and chafe my reproductive organs.
    – They use far less energy than an electric car.
    – They’re safe, you might get hit with a scooter at best bump your head or a laceration, most scooter incidents happen at intersections; the result of cars hitting them, MORE intersection safety enforcement is needed.
    – No license requirements.

    They require only modest safety enforcement, encouraging the police carry out public safety is the solution. Even better E-scooter manufacture/maintenance can be a local business just like biking is for Portland. Not to mention Racing. E-scooter proliferation may encourage the city to pursue expanding and repair; smooth and clean sidewalk initiative after the infamous Fecal fiasco when for example; San Francisco streets tested positive for fecal borne diseases not seen since the 19th century. A standing electric scooter is a few inches wide and less than 3 feet long; plus folds to be carried. In other words it takes up no more or less space than what an adult man occupies in his walking stride. Average walking speed is 3 mph, so an e-scooter going 6 mph is no terrifying threat to public safety, People jog at 6 mph and they bypass slowpokes frequently; the only thing e-scooters need is a mandated speed limit or horsepower restriction. Roller blades, skates, skateboards show few signs of political finagling of trying to get ride of them.

    The only reason they’re going after e-scooters is because the city cant charge congestion or parking fees like automobiles, Doesn’t collect any transit fares like buses or trains. People just need to be responsible and know the limits and enforce the laws….but this is California and enforcing public decency and sensible laws went out the window years ago. The only reason that scooters are a hazard, is because they are always swerving around feces and needles.

  • Danial josef

    Hello, reader, I think you find Scooter relevant reviews to solve your problems, to know about today’s best products, to know more about all it.
    Find for the best marketplace of world best scooters.
    Don’t worry I will give you something more ideas and give you the best marketplace for it, That helps you make true your dream and give something more about scooter.