Skip to content
Sponsored

Will Democrats Fall for Trump’s Fake Infrastructure Plan?

The early signs are not encouraging.
2:40 PM PST on January 11, 2018
Will Democrats Fall for Trump’s Fake Infrastructure Plan?
Photo: Gage Skidmore/Flickr

After more than a year of teasing, Trump administration officials say the White House infrastructure plan will drop later this month.

This is one area where Trump can’t rely on GOP majorities to push through major legislation. An infrastructure bill will need 60 Senate votes to pass, but Democrats might decide to withhold their support instead of giving Trump a bipartisan legislative accomplishment heading into the midterms.

In terms of policy, the Trump team has signaled at every occasion that their infrastructure plan will be a disaster for cities and transit. His budget proposals have called for merciless cuts to transit funding (Congress didn’t follow through on the worst of it), and the administration has been refusing to release grants for transit projects around the country, threatening their completion.

Nevertheless, this was the message from Delaware Senator Tom Carper, ranking member of the Senate Committee on the Environment and Public Works, in a press release yesterday:

I am hopeful that we will finally see the long-promised infrastructure proposal from the Trump Administration sooner rather than later.

While there is no shortage of issues on which the president and I disagree, the kind of large scale trillion dollar infrastructure investment that then-candidate Trump talked about is something that has the potential to elicit bipartisan support here in Congress.

On the surface, this seems like a naive take on Trump’s sloganeering about a “$1 trillion infrastructure plan.” Carper might be saving a confrontation for later, but making entreaties to work out an infrastructure deal probably won’t end well, given what we already know.

In December, Politico reported that Trump and the GOP only planned to spend $200 million in federal funds on infrastructure over ten years. Some of that would potentially come from cuts to other programs — like healthcare and education. The other $800 would come from cities, states, and private financing.

The types of infrastructure deals the Trump administration is already trying to encourage don’t bode well for a larger package. Under Trump, U.S. DOT has already been caught restructuring project funding packages to funnel more money to banks and extract more from taxpayers.

Democrats in the Senate have a lot of leverage in this process. But if party leaders like Carper don’t even try to drive a hard bargain, their constituents will lose.

Photo of Angie Schmitt
Angie is a Cleveland-based writer with a background in planning and newspaper reporting. She has been writing about cities for Streetsblog for six years.

Read More:

Streetsblog has migrated to a new comment system. New commenters can register directly in the comments section of any article. Returning commenters: your previous comments and display name have been preserved, but you'll need to reclaim your account by clicking "Forgot your password?" on the sign-in form, entering your email, and following the verification link to set a new password — this is required because passwords could not be carried over during the migration. For questions, contact tips@streetsblog.org.

More from Streetsblog Los Angeles

Wednesday’s Headlines

April 22, 2026

The Week In Livable Streets

April 21, 2026

Tuesday’s Headlines

April 21, 2026

Metro Still Planning 605 Freeway Widening Mega-Project, Additional $46.9M Slated to be Approved This Week

April 20, 2026

Monday’s Headlines

April 20, 2026
See all posts