Skip to Content
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Log In
Streetsblog USA

Uber Can’t Replace Transit — Here Are 3 Reasons Why

Cars consume a lot more space to move the same amount of people as a bus. Photo: Solaris Bus and Coach

Transit projects from Detroit to Nashville are running up against a new argument from opponents. The latest line from anti-transit types is that ride-hailing apps like Uber and Lyft are going to make fixed-route bus or rail service obsolete.

It doesn't hold up if you've given some thought to the huge amount of space cars consume compared to buses or trains. But many people don't spend their days thinking about the spatial efficiency of transit.

If you find yourself arguing with someone about why transit is essential, a new fact sheet from TransitCenter can help. It makes the case that Uber can't replace transit in clear, compelling terms that anyone can understand [PDF].

Here are TransitCenter's three points for transit advocates to commit to memory.

1. Uber and Lyft hog too much space

Let's say, hypothetically, that a city gives up on transit service because officials think Uber and Lyft can take care of things from now on. Imagine what happens next: Everyone who rides the LA Metro Bus system suddenly crowds onto the 405 in an Uber, every passenger on New York's L train has to hail a ride over the Williamsburg Bridge. The result would be total gridlock.

Uber and Lyft have some advantages in certain contexts. But car services can't overcome urban geometry.

2. Even lightly-used transit beats heavily-used ride-hailing services

Not every bus is packed, but even a mostly-empty bus can use streets more efficiently than Ubercars. A bus carrying about 10 passengers per service hour is generally considered to be "low-performing," TransitCenter points out. But that still beats the pants off ride-hail services.

"For an Uber or Lyft driver to serve ten people per hour," writes TransitCenter, "it would mean the driver is picking up a new passenger every six minutes, physically impossible in American cities."

3. Demand for transit peaks at different times than demand for taxis

If you look at when Uber and Lyft are most popular, it's during the night, when transit runs less often. Meanwhile, transit is at its fullest during the a.m. and p.m. rush. Not many people use Uber and Lyft for regular commuting.

Transit and ride-hailing services can complement each other -- especially at times or in places where transit is weaker. But don't be taken in by anyone predicting the end of transit -- buses and trains aren't going anywhere.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog Los Angeles

L.A. City Fiscal Year 24-25 Bikeway Mileage Buoyed by Completed Paths

This year L.A. City added 35.6 lane-miles of new or improved bike facilities - about half of that was new bike/walk paths

November 18, 2025

Tuesday’s Headlines

ICE, ESFV rail, TAP-to-Exit, ULA, L.A. River, Glendale, rain, OC Streetcar, car-nage, and more

November 18, 2025

This Week In Livable Streets

The War on Cars, Burbank-Chandler bike path, Long Beach backbone bikeway, Metro meetings, CicLAvia Things get Stranger, and more.

November 17, 2025

Monday’s Headlines

ICE, Orange Avenue Long Beach, Burbank, Measure HLA, Melrose CicLAvia, LAPD, Jesse Marquez, La Cañada, car-nage, and more

November 17, 2025

Friday Round-Up: Pico Blvd., Koreatown Circle, and SGV E-Bikes

LADOT installs pedestrian safety upgrades at deadly Ktown intersection. Apply for SGV e-bike vouchers by Monday. LADOT plans major safety upgrades on Pico Boulevard.

November 14, 2025

Friday’s Headlines

ICE, rain, Measure HLA, L.A. River path, 5 Freeway widening, Koreatown, LAX, South Gate, Glendale, car-nage and more

November 14, 2025
See all posts