Complete Streets Today: The Challenges of Swimming in the Mainstream

Is getting around Los Angeles without a car as “alternative” as it was just four years ago?
Is getting around Los Angeles without a car as “alternative” as it was just four years ago?

Join us in writing the next chapters of complete streets history by registering now for the 2015 UCLA Complete Streets conference on Thursday, May 14.

Join me on a brief journey back in time to the first time the UCLA School of Public Affairs hosted a conference about Complete Streets. The year was 2011 and mobility and streets in the region looked quite a bit different. The Los Angeles Bicycle Master Plan was recently adopted, and very little of it had been implemented. There was no Expo Line; Metro had neither a complete streets policy nor a first-last mile plan. There were no parklets or plazas. There were no pedestrian staff at the Los Angeles Department of Transportation.

And in these regards, Los Angeles was not unique: San Francisco was still locked in their bike plan lawsuit, the Washington D.C bike share system had just been installed, Citibike was a glimmer in Janette Sadik-Khan’s eye, and Chicago didn’t have a single mile of protected bikeway. Suffice it to say, while many of us in the transportation field wished for this future; it was hard to see it coming just four years ago.

UCLA Complete Streets 2013 JSK
Janette Sadik-Khan chats with UCLA Professor Martin Wachs at the 2013 UCLA Complete Streets event.

In 2011, complete streets appeared to be more of a movement among bicycle and pedestrian advocates, working inside and outside government to try and find some space for people to use “alternative” modes. We were even still using the word “alternative,” as if riding a bicycle to a friends house were equivalent to listening to the Sex Pistols in the 1970s.

So where are we now? Why does UCLA continue to host a conference on this topic and what is different this year compared to 2011, 2012 and 2013? In short: this is a rapidly evolving field and just in our 2 year absence, a lot has changed. For example, a big change on many minds is the elimination of Level of Service (LOS) as a threshold for traffic impacts; we’ll have a speaker from the California Office of Planning and Research along with an example from Pasadena, a city that has already adopted their new non-LOS measure. This is a conference theme: the increasing extent to which biking and walking are being integrated into mobility planning, rather than being siloed in one-off plans conducted by boutique shops.

UCLA Complete Streets 2013 Shoup
UCLA Professor Donald Shoup parks himself on a couch and checks his email.

What are the changes, opportunities, and challenges that come along with this new-found integration into larger conversations about transportation and mobility? Notably, a change in language; thankfully, we now discuss how to provide transportation “options” rather than “alternative” modes.

The day’s agenda will challenge attendees to think about including complete streets as part and parcel of mobility planning. We’ll provide the forum, space and speakers for thinking about this and some examples. Our three broad panel topics are process, equity and the media. The breakout sessions allow for people to get a deep dive into issues of the future; moving away from LOS, thinking about goods movement considerations and pedestrian issues for our aging society. Overall, the day celebrates the transition of complete streets from the margins to the mainstream, and asks us to consider the challenges of operating at this higher level.

If that teaser doesn’t spark your interest, then perhaps our stellar speakers and their presentation topics will. Please join us.

Register for the day and guarantee your seat at the keynote address with the U.S. Secretary of Transportation Anthony Foxx at the Historic Union Station Ticket Hall.

  • davistrain

    The use of “alternative” to describe non-automotive personal transport systems reminds me of how, back about 33 years ago, then-Goverrnor Deukmejian referred to railway passenger service as “exotic” transportation. It implies that people who don’t drive are “out of the mainstream”, “unfortunate souls” or even “hippie tree huggers”.

  • Plannerd

    Yes, it should be “Active Transportation!”

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

UCLA Complete Streets Conference this Thursday

|
When UCLA started it’s annual Complete Streets Conference in February of 2011, discussing topics like parklets, bike plan and implementation, seemed more like an academic exercise a description Los Angeles two years later.  Now in it’s third year, the conference continues to deliver innovative ideas, but also takes some time to reflect on local implementation.   […]

Attendence Down at Bike Plan Hearings (Updated, 3:16 P.M.)

|
(Note: There is a Bike Plan meeting tonight in South L.A. and Saturday in Van Nuys.  Check out the Streetsblog calendar for more information.  A list of Streetsblog’s complete coverage of the Bike Plan from the launch of this website can be found here.- DN) In February of 2008, the LADOT, City Planning, and consultants […]

UCLA Advancing the Complete Streets Dialogue

|
Last Thursday UCLA hosted its third annual Complete Streets Conference in Downtown Los Angeles. I was excited to have had the opportunity to attend with such a packed line up for the all day event, with a few big names in the mix including the esteemed Janette Sadik-Khan. During the opening presentation UCLA professor Anastasia […]