DTSC Issues Eight Violations Against Exide after Inspection of Shuttered Facilities

The sign greeting visitors to Exide Technologies' Vernon facilities. Sahra Sulaiman/Streetsblog L.A.
The sign greeting visitors to Exide Technologies’ Vernon facilities. Sahra Sulaiman/Streetsblog L.A.

A press release sent out by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) this morning states that the DTSC has issued eight violations of state hazardous waste laws against embattled Vernon lead-acid battery recycler Exide for violations discovered during recent facility inspections it conducted with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

The violations are of concern.

Exide was ordered to cease smelting operations in March of 2014 because of its struggle to comply with new rules issued by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The rules, approved in January of 2014, established requirements for the reduction of arsenic emissions and other key toxic air contaminant emissions, set requirements for ambient air concentration limits for arsenic, as well as hourly emission limits of arsenic, benzene, and 1,3-butadiene (all known carcinogens), and contained additional administrative, monitoring, and source testing requirements for stack emissions at lead-acid battery recycling facilities.

Unwilling to take responsibility for the health risk assessment, which had found that arsenic emissions from the plant posed an elevated cancer risk to as many as 110,000 people living in surrounding areas, and displeased by the more stringent emissions standards which required that Exide install costly new “negative pressure” air filtering equipment by April 10, 2014, Exide promptly sued.

To the relief of most residents, Exide lost its appeals and was forced to remain closed while cleaning up the facilities and making the required upgrades to the plant.

Which means that the current set of violations are a result of Exide’s failure to properly manage the very processes intended to help it operate more cleanly.

In the press release, DTSC inspectors cite the “treatment of contaminated sludge in tanks that Exide is not authorized to operate at its Vernon facility” and the failure to “sufficiently protect against spills in an area where [Exide] stores materials, including battery acid” as being among its more egregious violations.

Terrible as they sound, these violations may not necessarily come as a huge surprise. For some time, the DTSC has accused Exide of failing to paint an accurate picture of the amount of lead-contaminated waste on the site, the sites and containers in which it is be located, the safety assessments of tanks holding hazardous waste to withstand earthquakes, or even the kinds of sampling that would need to be conducted after-the-fact to ensure the site was properly cleaned up.

Which is probably why I found the statement that the DTSC “notified Exide that it must immediately take steps to ensure that rain cannot enter the building” by addressing the “holes in the walls and ceiling of the building” inspectors had spotted to be somewhat more alarming.

At first, I thought my alarm stemmed from having spent too much time looking at some of the photos of inspectors in hazmat suits making their way past piles of waste and corroded walls in the interior of the plant (below) and imagining what kind of horrible damage that could do if it ended up in our waterways (see more here).

But it probably stems from Exide’s long history of environmental negligence, having contributed “through deposition, approximately 424 lbs. of lead in both 2004 and 2005 and 712 lbs. of lead in 2006 to the watershed,” and the current charge that Exide had “failed to minimize the possibility of any unplanned sudden or non-sudden release of hazardous wastes or hazardous waste constituents to air, soil, or surface water” by not addressing corroded pipes (something it has also had problems with in the past).

April 18, 2014 -- View inside the Reverb Furnace Feedstock Room. (Source: DTSC)
View inside the Reverb Furnace Feedstock Room at Exide in April of 2014. (Source: DTSC)

The DTSC and EPA inspectors evaluated the plant over a two-day period last week and also conducted some oversight of activities at the plant on December 12, 2014.

The evaluation was part of the DTSC’s ongoing assessment of Exide’s third application for a formal permit allowing it to handle hazardous waste. [As Exide-watchers may know, Exide took over operations at the Vernon site from Gould-National Battery in 2000, but didn’t submit a formal permit application until 2011. The DTSC found its 2011 application to be deficient, as well as that submitted in 2012, and the most recent 2014 application. The DTSC is currently reviewing Exide’s revision of its 2014 application and has until the end of 2015 to either grant the permit or begin the process of shutting down the plant for good.]

With regard to Exide’s most recent violations, the DTSC states it has “directed Exide to protect public health by immediately stopping all violations.”

And while area residents will likely note with chagrin that that sort of language has held little sway with Exide in the past, the DTSC has imposed a deadline of 10 days within which Exide must submit documentation that the violations have been addressed. Should they fail to do so, they will face penalties and, possibly, additional enforcement actions.

If you’d like to see the summary of all eight violations, you can find that here. General information on DTSC’s interactions with Exide can be found at their website, here.

 

  • This is exactly the type of anti-business “onerous” regulations the Republicans seem keen to shut down. After all, this is a job creator, they employee people, how can you be against these people having a job. Yet, this highlights how dangerous that position is.

    In some ways, I would like to see more free market about it. Lets say to operate a business like this you must carry some liability insurance, cost of cleaning up how ever many tons of lead and toxic chemicals you process from the water shed, 50 billion dollars. Plus lawsuits from from 100k people who now have elevated cancer risks 100 billion. They must carry 150 billion dollars in liability insurance to operate their business. Now any insurer insuring 150 billion dollars in risk is going to want to make darn sure you take every precaution to avoid such a catastrophe. But I’m sure the requirement to carry such insurance would also be an “onerous anti-business regulation”.

  • Fake name

    Time to start calling Jackie Lacey. These guys need the threat of felony charges if they’re going to do anything.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Exide Cited for String of Lead Emissions Violations by EPA

|
I receive my fair share of press releases regarding environmental happenings and community events, but few are more morbidly amusing than Exide Technologies’ efforts to paint itself as the good guy every time it is slammed with a massive violation. The most recent one from the embattled Vernon lead-acid battery recycler is in response to […]

Victory in Our Time: Exide Plant to Close for Good, First Phase of Clean-Up of Site to Begin Immediately

|
As news began to trickle out Wednesday night that, under an agreement with the U.S. Attorney’s Office, embattled lead-acid battery recycler Exide Technologies will be forced to permanently shutter its Vernon plant, hope seemed to have finally been restored to those who have spent years clamoring for environmental justice. In the 15 years since Exide took […]