Plaza 2.0: When People St. Plaza Projects are More Than Just Plaza Projects
Of all the places in the city I can think of, 43rd Place is probably the most appropriate place for a plaza project and the most likely to be able to replicate some of what makes a space a plaza.
For one, the wide and quiet street, running alongside a sizable park space that already plays the role of public square and anchor of the monthly artwalk, will serve as the welcome mat for several important community arts spaces and galleries (see more about that here, here, and here).
As such, it has the potential to serve as a special-occasion spillover space for those venues, doubling as a temporary performance space, outdoor gallery space, or fitness space (capoeira, zumba, yoga, etc.), or play host other creative endeavors.
Second, the variety of programming an arts-heavy community offers can draw multiple generations of families. Events including the art walk already have a family-reunion sort of feel to them, as it is. More space to test out interactive street furniture, jump rope, or just play can enhance those events and keep the plaza active in between formal happenings.
Third, located within spitting distance of Crenshaw Blvd. — a newly designated “Great Street” — and the coming Metro stop, it will likely serve as an important rest and/or contemplative spot for those exploring the neighborhood.
For these reasons and more, community members have voiced a strong desire to see the creation of a permanent installation that celebrates the area’s cultural and architectural/art deco heritage while also reflecting their hopes for its future as a creative district.
It is an approach that puts them slightly at odds with the People St. framework, which offers year-long renewable permits for communities looking to install plazas, parklets, or bike corrals in their neighborhoods, and has a limited menu of standardized design options intended to make the permitting and implementation processes easier. While the program supports the eventual conversion of the installations into permanent fixtures, the initial project itself must be designed as if temporary (i.e. no permanent furniture or public art).
Cognizant of the limits of the program, but still thinking longer-term, the stakeholders appear ready to find the resources to fill in the gaps between what the city can offer and what they need to adequately showcase their community.
They’ve done this sort of thing before.
In late 2007, a five-year effort came to fruition in the form of the Sankofa Passage along Degnan Blvd. (running perpendicular to 43rd Pl.).
The block-length walk is embedded with the names of important African-American artists, stamped with folk art animals, and graced by terracotta African-style planters. The Sankofa birds — Akan (Ghana) symbols signifying the importance of carrying wisdom from your past with you as you move forward — and the slave brands emblazoned around the names of the artists effectively remind you of where you are and who walked before you.
Across the street from the above planters (and barely visible, above), a parking lot fence is also adorned with lizards and a river-like passage imitating the one stamped into the sidewalk (below).
These cultural markers are part of what make Leimert Park Village so special — you are immediately aware you are in a distinct place with a storied, unique history.
This distinction is what the area’s stakeholders seek to build on with their plaza proposal — they have no desire to be mistaken for Silver Lake’s Sunset Triangle Plaza.
Not that the triangle plaza is so terrible, of course, although it looks worse for the wear and does not yet feel like it is either permanent or has a permanent identity.
But, the re-branding effort underway as part of the 20/20 Vision Initiative hinges specifically on the marketing of Leimert as a unique and distinct place that is on the threshold of a creative cultural renaissance.
And, while stakeholders share People St.’s goals of reclaiming streets and creating enhanced pedestrian environments, the project is about much more than that for them. It has to be — they are all too well aware that pedestrians won’t arrive more regularly in force until some of the economic and creative development they are trying to foster begins to take root.
Conversations with stakeholders lead me to think they’ve managed to balance those objectives in their proposal and have the wherewithal to work with the city to develop a project that benefits both the community and wider Los Angeles, and that is exciting to see.
If you’d like to learn more about the community’s development initiative, please click here. If you’d like to hear more about the design in person, you can attend the stakeholders’ meeting April 21 (click here) or sign the petition (to be submitted April 29th) in support of their proposal, here.