Hyperion Hearing: It’s Not About Bikes, It’s About Communities and People

Including the ones from LACBC and the one below from Tomas O'Grady (below), we now have three community proposals for the Hyperion Bridge retrofit besides the official one by the city's Bureau of Engineering. This one is by ##http://racdb.com/index.html##RAC Design Build##

If you were keeping score at home, something which would be impossible because of our failed attempt at Live Streaming, it was a blowout. Nearly fifty speakers took to the podium. Four of them spoke in favor of the current design. The rest made the case for a more Livable design, lower speeds, and better access for bicyclists and pedestrians.

After nine years of comment and design, the Hyperion Glendale Seismic Retrofit plan had its first official public hearing last night. The main purpose of the project is to retrofit the bridge so it can withstand a major earthquake. However, during the retrofit, other work will be done to increase safety on the bridge. The current plan calls for tiny sidewalks, a gutter bike lane, four mixed-use 11-foot travel lanes and a 2-foot divider with two more feet of buffer in the middle of the road. The bridge is in the city’s 2010 Bike Plan, and advocates were surprised and incensed to find the bridge wouldn’t have bike lanes.

The alarm spread well outside of the bicycle community. River advocates, pedestrian safety advocates, neighborhood councils, Assembly Member Mike Gatto, and Glendale Council Member Laura Friedman all got involved, asking for a safer bridge for all road users.

Those that spoke up last night for the current project did so because they believe a seismic retrofit is needed as quickly as possible and that a center divider is needed for safety to keep cars from colliding with each other. All were Atwater residents who have worked on the project for nearly a decade. None are what you would call NIMBY or anti-bicycle. They just want the project completed.

But last night wasn’t about keeping score. It wasn’t just about bicycles. Last night was about communities, people and safety.

The Livable Streets stars were out. Eric Bruins with the Los Angeles County Bicycle Coalition crunched the crash data to show slower speeds would reduce crashes. Occidental College Professor Mark Vallianatos drew the link between wider lanes and faster vehicle traffic. Don “Roadblock” Ward argued that an LADOT engineer’s claims that the average speed on the bridge is thirty-seven miles an hour was not what the public had been told at previous meetings. L.A. Walks founder Deborah Murphy delivered such powerful testimony that Urban Homestead co-author Erik Knutzen followed her basically said ‘Murphy is right’ and left the podium.

The night even featured an appearance by Bobby Gadda, the original Chair of the Steering Committee for CicLAvia, who had biked down from San Francisco.

“I just biked 500 miles from San Francisco…but the scariest part happened about an hour ago coming across the Hyperion Bridge downward spiral death zone,” Gadda testified. “I heartily encourage anyone who designs this bridge to ride across it on a bike. Put on a safety vest. You probably won’t die.”

Each speech was followed by applause.

But the night wasn’t about the star testimony or applause. Last night was about communities, people, and safety. Everyday residents testified that they wanted a way to walk between Atwater and Silver Lake. They didn’t want the bridge to be a barrier only able to be safely traversed surrounded by metal. They wanted change.

Enrich L.A.'s proposal submitted by founder Tomas O'Grady.

Tomas O’Grady, a one-time political opponent of Council Member Tom LaBonge and founder of Enrich L.A., brings his own design for a road diet, but more persuasive than the impressive rendering was his call for a bridge that brings together the communities of Atwater and Silver Lake because that’s what makes the most sense for his children, now teenagers, and his family.

Similar comments were made by Melissa Casey, Kelly Thompson and Jenny Chamberlain. Each of the three mothers had a similar story, with a different twist. Casey told of how not just her children, but her mother-in law are made prisoners of a bridge they are scared to cross, Thompson of how she is scared every day her husband bikes to work and Chamberlain recounted how her children wanted to bike a quarter mile across the bridge when they were five, but she still won’t let them walk or bike across it today.

Marshall High School student Andres Miyares crosses Hyperion every day on his way to school on his bicycle. Miyares, a resident of Highland Park, finds the commute to be a harrowing one.

“It’s not a fun experience. There’s this one turn where cars are hugging the corner and you just hope you don’t get hit. I’ve feared for my life at least ten times,” he testified. “I don’t want to die one day just going to school.”

Another speaker, who went just by Adam, is still alive following a harrowing bicycle crash that left him hospitalized.

“In 2007, I was nearly killed on this bridge,” he began before pleading with the city to find a way to slow down traffic on the bridge. “I’m just finding out about this (the redesign), so I can’t come in with all this technical information, but I know people go too fast on this bridge. But I know that four lanes is too many.”

Following Adam’s emotional testimony, his friend Mark Marren continued the story, telling of how he and Adam left work at the same time one evening in 2007, but Adam didn’t get home for six months. Amazingly, just days before a crash with a speeding car nearly took Adam’s life, he witnessed Bill Winguard, a pedestrian, get struck in the same area. Further driving the point home, Marrnen’s ex-wife had been hit in roughly the same area.

I’ve gone to County and seen my friends lay there because of that bridge. I don’t want to see that again,” Marren concluded.

Before the public testimony, representatives from the Bureau of Engineering presented a new rendering for the bridge design. The new design showed the crash walls still in place, but also reduced the width of the mixed-use travel lanes from the original design to make space for a three foot bicycle lane. While the plan shows that the project engineers are thinking outside of the original box, there are still problems with the plan. It still has tiny sidewalks and three foot “gutter” bike lanes may actually do more harm than good.

“Three feet is too narrow,” testified Jeff Jacobberger, a member of the city’s Bicycle Advisory Committee. “Bicyclists will have to take the lane. Drivers will think, ‘There is a bike lane.’ It will cause road rage.”

The lowlight of the evening came when an LADOT Senior Engineer was called on to give background on the project. The engineer was unable to answer basic questions about the design, including what speed the new design was rated for. The engineer twice wistfully put it that the bridge traffic would “be lucky” if it could be rated for 35 miles per hour, but 55 miles per hour was beyond imagination. The consultant who once said the new lanes would be rated for 55 miles per hour was nowhere to be seen.

As a test, I drove across the Hyperion Bridge last night at about 4 pm. Going west, my speed averaged about 52 miles per hour. Going east, it was roughly the same. In both cases, I was in the left hand lane, driving with the flow of traffic.

I wasn’t passing anyone.

After the engineer testified that the median speed on the bridge was “37 or 38 miles per hour,” Michelle Mowery took over answering questions on behalf of the Department. The Senior Bicycle Coordinator was doing some triage by keeping the engineer from sounding any more separated from reality. She couldn’t necessarily give better answers than her colleague, she just did so without sounding so enthusiastic about fast-moving cars. Mowery couldn’t explain what data is used to justify the center median, usually used to prevent highway crashes, because the Department is still analyzing the crash data.

Towards the end of the hearing, Marino Pascal half-joked that the bridge project was right “At Ground Zero for bicycles,” noting the history of bike culture in Silver Lake and Echo Park. While that is doubtlessly true, and many of the over 150 people in the audience were bicycle advocates, last night wasn’t just about bikes.


  • Roadblock

    Lets not forget the testimony of Andy Lenigan who found in Caltrans own report that during construction on the Hyperion Bridge itself, 1 lane in each direction will be removed for 11 months. Basically WE CAN HAVE A ROAD DIET and according to CAL TRANS own document it would not have a significant impact on traffic.

    The Gelndale-Hyperion IS EA study states:

    “During the construction of the Hyperion Avenue improvements, traffic flow would be limited to one lane in each direction for at least 11 months. The affected segment of Hyperion Avenue would be approximately 1,800 feet long. Table 2.4-2 shows the critical existing hourly volumes occurring during the morning peak hour in the southbound direction (1,295 vehicles per hour) and evening peak hour in the northbound direction (1,325 vehicles per hour) (MGE, 2012). With these peak- hour traffic volumes and the standard traffic requirements, one lane in each direction would be able to adequately accommodate this traffic flow.

    There are no cross streets or driveways along the segment of Hyperion Avenue under construction, which means that interruption to through traffic would be minimal.

    Construction site traffic would be regulated at 25 miles per hour. At this speed, the capacity of one uninterrupted lane could be as high as 1,500 vehicles per hour with an average gap of 65 feet between vehicles. This would provide operating conditions of LOS D or better.”

    AUGUST 2013

    Lets get a road diet, buffered green bike lanes, a signalized ped crossing at the east base of the bridge no crash barriers and 3ft extension of the sidewalks or kill this project.

  • Roadblock

    Peak hour traffic according to their report is around 1300 on the bridge. Meaning with a road diet, the bridge would do JUST FINE.

    Road Diet or NOTHIN.

  • Kenny Easwaran

    I’m so glad someone else found that same passage! I found it, but then realized I didn’t have time to make it to the meeting, but I’m glad this got mentioned.

    The study a little bit later predicts that 20 years from now, the traffic will exceed the capacity of a single lane in each direction at 25 mph, but it’s hard to know what to make of that. Last night I remember finding a site that had counts of cars over the bridge at several points in the past, which found that back in 1992 there were nearly twice as many cars going over the bridge as there were in 2000 and 2008 (I think those were the two other count times). I don’t know why there might have been so many more cars in the past, but presumably the city can keep track of traffic conditions to make sure that doesn’t return, rather than just passively accepting a 1% car increase per year on every road (which would be fairly surprising, given the direction things have been going).

  • Kenny Easwaran

    Are these alternate plans available somewhere to look at? The RAC DB plan is a bit too small to look at from this zoom, and I can’t find any info about it on their page. I’ve found the O’Grady plan here:


  • PC

    Sorry I couldn’t be there. Glad other people could.

    Not really sure why that small handful of people from Atwater are so emotionally invested in that crash barrier unless they truly expect and/or want car traffic to keep on rolling at freeway speeds on the bridge. There’s no other explanation.

  • Roadblock

    LADOT predictions are old and not in line with the current trend of driving estimates falling. Car driving in the USA, according to several studies, peaked some years ago.

  • Salts

    Not to mention their calculations don’t take into account rising price of gas. As gas prices go up (and they undoubtedly will go up a lot within the next 10 years) the demand and ability to drive will decline even more.

    Also, Millennials aren’t driving as much so how they can conclude that driving will increase is just bizarre.

  • james

    I’m trying to imagine how I would cycle east to Atwater in Ladot’s autopian wetdream: I would ride east on a glorified sidewalk, then pedestrianize myself at a crosswalk on the bridge (where surely no one would ever yield to me), then turn around and ride west in a gutter lane, then get on a bicycle path below the bridge, close to the river (which will be gated off at the first sign of drizzle), ride south east along a jogging trail, then turn around and ride up a bicycle/pedestrian ramp back up to the bridge and re-enter traffic in a gutter lane, ride east to where the gutter lane disappears and then go fuck myself and die as enter Atwater. Is that right, did I miss something? This might be the least direct means of riding a bicycle across a bridge I have ever come across.

  • daveedkapoor

    Here is a link to a 2 page pdf of the RAC Design Build Proposal: http://racdb.com/HYPERION_BRIDGE_ALTERNATIVE.pdf

  • Kenny Easwaran

    Thanks! It looks like they’ve gone with the one lane in each direction plan in order to make the bridge a very spacious place for walking and biking. I wonder though how well the bridge would hold up to putting landscaping on it – tree roots seem like they could cause a lot of damage, and even bushes or grass might need a deeper section of soil than the bridge can hold, but I’m not a landscape engineer, so I don’t know for sure.


The Hyperion Bridge Uprising Storms the Gates

I’m going to make a little confession. When I first wrote about the Glendale Boulevard-Hyperion Avenue Complex of Bridges redesign project, I was resigned to a negative outcome. I believed the Bureau of Engineering was too far along in the process, and city leaders too entrenched in the outcome. At the time, the city noted […]

O’Farrell Backs More Study of Potential Designs for Hyperion Bridge, Promises Citizen’s Advisory Committee

Mitch O'Farrell Letter, Hyperion Bridge Count City Council Member Mitch O’Farrell, who represents the Silver Lake Community on one side the the Hyperion Bridge, as one of the elected officials concerned with the current design proposed by the City’s Bureau of Engineering (BoE) and the State Department of Transportation (Caltrans). As Streetsblog has covered extensively, […]

Editorial: Respect Your Advisory Committee, Build a Safer Hyperion Bridge

There has been quite a bit of proverbial water under the Glendale-Hyperion Bridge. Under a great deal of community displeasure in 2013, the city of Los Angeles set aside an outdated bridge retrofit plan and formed an advisory committee to decide the future of the historic span. The 9-member Glendale-Hyperion Viaduct Improvement Project Community Advisory Committee […]

Public Works Board Approves Sidewalk Deficient Glendale-Hyperion Bridge

In a hearing at City Hall this morning, the mayor-appointed Board of Public Works unanimously approved proceeding with the city Bureau of Engineering’s (BOE) recommendation to eliminate one of two sidewalks on its Glendale-Hyperion Bridge retrofit project. The latest version, announced earlier this week, has not changed significantly since 2013 when BOE pushed a similar unsafe design, leading […]