Skip to content
Sponsored

In Miami, Cloaking an Anti-Cycling Proposal in Bike-Friendly Language

A county commissioner in Miami has introduced legislation to "provide greater flexibility to the Florida Department of Transportation related to bicycle lanes." In other words, flexibility not to include them, even though federal rules require state DOTs to give "due consideration" to bike facilities in all federally-funded projects -- a directive that US DOT clarified in 2010, saying that decisions should start with "the presumption that bikes will be accommodated."
9:04 AM PDT on September 4, 2012

A county commissioner in Miami has introduced legislation to “provide greater flexibility to the Florida Department of Transportation related to bicycle lanes.” In other words, flexibility not to include them, even though federal rules require state DOTs to give “due consideration” to bike facilities in all federally-funded projects — a directive that US DOT clarified in 2010, saying that decisions should start with “the presumption that bikes will be accommodated.”

The language of Miami-Dade Legislative Item #121569 initially goes on about the benefits of cycling, then launches into a list of situations in which bike facilities “conflict” with car infrastructure: essentially streets with curbside parking or high-speed traffic.

Matthew Toro at Transit Miami is sounding the alarm on this one:

The proposed resolution is littered with nonsense that would — with no far stretch of the imagination — actually curtail the expansion of bicycle facilities throughout our community. Four specific bike lanes, intended to exemplify inappropriately located bike lanes, come under attack in the current language of the resolution. This is where it implodes, demonstrating the detachment of many of our elected officials to the non-automobile reality on the streets.

The proposed County Commission resolution is not the path (pun unavoidable) to improving bikeability in Miami. As it currently stands, the language in the item would reverse the little progress we’ve thus far made.

Toro is encouraging local cyclists to contact the county to express their opposition.

Elsewhere on the Network today: Pedestrian Observations investigates whether freeways, designed to maximize safety for drivers, actually do. The Chicago Bicycle Advocate outlines the results of a Sun Times investigation on the biggest dangers to local cyclists. And the Transport Politic looks at Los Angeles County’s long history of support for transit referendums, and why progress still isn’t fast enough for Mayor Villaraigosa.

Photo of Angie Schmitt
Angie is a Cleveland-based writer with a background in planning and newspaper reporting. She has been writing about cities for Streetsblog for six years.

Read More:

Streetsblog has migrated to a new comment system. New commenters can register directly in the comments section of any article. Returning commenters: your previous comments and display name have been preserved, but you'll need to reclaim your account by clicking "Forgot your password?" on the sign-in form, entering your email, and following the verification link to set a new password — this is required because passwords could not be carried over during the migration. For questions, contact tips@streetsblog.org.

More from Streetsblog Los Angeles

Friday’s Headlines

April 17, 2026

Pasadena Adopts Most of the 710 Stub Vision Plan

April 16, 2026

Thursday’s Headlines

April 16, 2026

After Reelection Loss, Chair Fernando Dutra to Leave Metro Board

April 15, 2026

Wednesday’s Headlines

April 15, 2026
See all posts