Skip to Content
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Log In
Streetsblog.net

Race to the Bottom: The Sad State of Public Discourse on Gas Prices

It's hard to imagine another commodity that would become a top news story each time its price rose a couple of cents. But such is America's addiction to oil. And while the appetite for these stories appears to be bottomless, major media outlets don't seem to have much stomach for examining the complicated set of factors that undergird the issue.

false

Frustratingly, leading Republicans are doing a pretty good job convincing the American public that the president can dictate prices at the pump, even while they propose a transportation policy that would only further entrench American gasoline dependence.

Yesterday environmental think tank the Post Carbon Institute reported "nearly two-thirds of the voters say they disapprove of the way the President is handling gasoline prices and only 26 percent approve of his energy policies. Interestingly, 54 percent of those polled believe the President can control gas prices."

Nathan Hamblen at Network blog N8han speaks for the rest of us:

I am in the “dumb” group on all of the questions. I disapprove of the way the government has long handled gasoline prices, by failing to put a substantial tax on it when prices were low. Doing so would have given us some room to maneuver in the future, when prices start to rise in earnest. I do not approve of the president’s energy polices, which strive to burn all remaining fuel reserves as quickly and cheaply as possible. And finally, of course the president (or government) can control (or affect) gas prices: they can increase them with a tax. Our government is unable to lower gas prices in a crisis only because it has insufficiently taxed gas in the past. And we are too recognizably broke to attempt a direct subsidy—one hopes.

For all the wrong reasons, the population correctly disapproves of American energy policy. They may go on disapproving, and electing increasingly ridiculous charlatans promising the impossible, until they get to choose between food and gasoline, or neither.

Elsewhere on the Network today: Steven Can Plan analyzes how the Chicago area splits its air pollution reduction funds between road projects and active transportation, and the resulting environmental impacts. Transit Miami, after putting pressure on FDOT to build safer roads, wins a victory for pedestrians and cyclists. And Rust Wire looks at the life- and attitude-altering decision to go car-free in a second-tier city.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog Los Angeles

Tuesday’s Headlines

ICE, (lack of) speed cameras, (no more) street repaving, crosswalks, fare enforcement, Ktown, parking, UCLA bike-share, Woodland Hills, Sawtelle, car-nage, and more

December 9, 2025

City Mostly Rejects Another Round of HLA Appeals, Some After Deadline to Make Determination Had Passed

City continues to find new ways to not move forward with street safety projects.

December 8, 2025

This Week In Livable Streets

L.A. City Council District 9 debate, Camino City Terrace, Metro December service changes, E Line railyard open house, and more

December 8, 2025

Monday’s Headlines

ICE, LAPD vs. DIY crosswalks, Measure HLA, large asphalt repair, Koreatown pedestrian safety, Mariachi Plaza mixed-use, high-speed rail, car-nage, and more

December 8, 2025

Friday’s Headlines

ICE terror escalating, Vision Zero failing, gondola, Olympics, Metro water taxi, NIMBYs vs. housing, car-nage and more

December 5, 2025
See all posts