Skip to Content
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Streetsblog Los Angeles home
Log In

Another day, another questionable proposal to enhance cyclist "safety."

Last week brought news that a New York City councilman has proposed legislation requiring licensure for cyclists. Then there was the proposal to ban cycling with child passengers in Oregon and another licensure call in New Jersey -- both thankfully dismissed.

Now a new bill has made its way into the Oregon statehouse and, once again, it conveniently sidesteps the foremost risk to cyclists: cars. Democratic Representative Michael Schaufler has proposed up to a $90 fine for cyclists caught in the deviant act of listening to headphones.

false

Jonathan Maus at Network blog Bike Portland has all the details:

Like Rep. Mitch Greenlick, who said he proposed the six-and-under biking ban out of a concern for safety, Schaufler is also motivated by safety. He told me last week that "I just saw some guy driving down the street on their bike with their headphones on and thought, 'He could get run over.' It's a safety issue. It's pretty cut and dry. It's a very simple, very basic concept."

What's interesting about this proposal is that, the way it's currently written, it would create an entirely new violation — "unsafe operation of a bicycle" — in the vehicle code. If passed, it's possible that additional provisions could be added to this law in the name of safety. Another thing to keep in mind is that, because of the way our current cell phone law is worded, it's unclear whether or not it applies to bicycle operators.

As for Rep. Schaufler, he's reportedly frustrated with "the online opposition from cyclists." Here's what he told the Willamette Week recently:

"They (cyclists) are the ones that are complaining about it,” Schaufler said. “People on bicycles ask for a whole lot and then they say, ‘don’t regulate us!’"

Maus has been soliciting comments from Bike Portland readers, who have made some interesting points. Would lawmakers better protect cyclists by trying to cut down on distractions for motorists -- including, for instance, car audio systems?

Elsewhere on the Network today: Copenhagenize discusses an especially ludicrous idea -- banning winter cycling -- put forth by newspaper commenters in Ontario. Ecocity Publicity Mobility introduces a new comic book illustrating car-free transportation options from around the world (you can see it in electronic form too). And American Dirt comments on the ubiquity of asphalt in America and its surprising effect on the natural environment.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog Los Angeles

Friday’s Headlines

Valley-Westside rail, South Bay rail, transit-oriented housing, green WeHo bike lanes, Country Club housing, LAPD, Avenue 60, car-nage, and more

January 23, 2026

January 2026 Metro Board Round-Up: Sepulveda Rail Approved, Torrance Rail Kneecapped

Valley-Westside subway plan approved. South Bay light rail delayed significantly, perhaps indefinitely.

January 22, 2026

Thursday’s Headlines

ICE, crosswalks, bus lane enforcement, Sepulveda rail, Torrance rail, Long Beach, MacArthur Park, LADOT, and more

January 22, 2026

Extending the Foothill A Line Hasn’t Been Forgotten

Plans are underway to get the track built to Claremont, and stakeholders remain hopeful that Montclair can make a comeback.

January 21, 2026

Wednesday’s Headlines

ICE, Metro meeting tomorrow, Torrance, transit ambassadors, Santa Monica, Glendale, red light cameras, Koreatown, Long Beach parking, car-nage, and more

January 21, 2026

Uh Oh! Dueling Alignments Could Throw Torrance Metro Rail Extension into Limbo

Metro's plan for a four-mile light rail extension from Redondo Beach to Torrance could get a lot more difficult, and more expensive

January 20, 2026
See all posts